AI Overview...
Chainsingh, State of Madras: Summary and Insights
- Legal Cases and Judgments Involving Chainsingh and Madras State:
- Several cases reference Chainsingh, notably involving land disputes, criminal cases, and procedural orders. For example, in the case relating to 30 Bighas of agricultural land called Chainsingh-wali-Kothi, courts examined land attachment and dispute resolution (Sources: 01701968052, 01700045999, 01701960010).
-
In criminal contexts, Chainsingh was involved in cases where transportation of wheat and accidents involving trucks were scrutinized, with courts considering the nature of possession and transportation of goods (Sources: 02700017051, 02700026542).
-
Legal Principles and Court Rulings:
- Several judgments highlight the authority of Madras High Court and other courts in dealing with property, procedural, and criminal law issues, often contrasting different judicial opinions. For instance, the Madras High Court's stance on land disputes and the validity of certain orders is discussed, emphasizing the evolving legal standards (Sources: 02700026542, 01700045999, 01701960010).
-
The cases also explore the jurisdictional limits of state authorities, such as the power of the State Government under various Acts, including the Employees State Insurance Act and sales tax laws, often challenging the vires of rules made under these statutes (Sources: 00200051381).
-
Property and Land Disputes:
- The dispute over the Chainsingh-wali-Kothi land in Sogra Guwar involves questions of land attachment, ownership, and the latest legal trends in Madras High Court jurisprudence, with courts analyzing whether proceedings were properly dropped or whether magistrates exceeded their authority (Sources: 01700045999, 01701960010).
-
The case references different viewpoints, including traditional Hindu law principles, with some courts recognizing differing opinions among jurists (Sources: 04400003893).
-
Legal Trends and Authority:
- The sources indicate a shift in judicial opinion over time, especially in land and procedural cases, with courts sometimes diverging from earlier Madras High Court decisions. This reflects the dynamic nature of legal interpretation concerning property rights and administrative powers (Sources: 01700045999, 01701960010).
Analysis and Conclusion
The references collectively depict the multifaceted legal landscape involving Chainsingh and the Madras jurisdiction, covering criminal law, property disputes, procedural orders, and statutory authority. Courts have examined the scope of governmental powers, the validity of rules, and the interpretation of land and criminal cases, often contrasting different judicial opinions to reflect evolving legal standards. These cases exemplify the complex interplay between statutory law, judicial precedents, and traditional legal principles within the Madras legal framework.
References: - Land and property disputes: 01701968052, 01700045999, 01701960010 - Criminal and procedural cases: 02700017051, 02700026542 - Statutory and constitutional issues: 00200051381 - Judicial opinions and legal principles: 04400003893
Search Results for "Chainsingh State of Madras"
2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 1824 • India - Madras
SUNDER MOHAN
He relied upon the Judgment of Madhya Pradesh High Court in Kasim Ali vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh dated 13.06.2016 in Misc. ... The State of Madhya Pradesh dated 13.06.2016 in Misc. Criminal Case No.1362 of 2015 relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners squarely applies to the facts of the instant case. ... State reported in 1998 (47) DRJ 84 in support of his submission that mere possession of spurious goods is sufficient to attract the offence under Section 420 IPC. 5. ... State reported in 1998 (47) DR....
1968 0 Supreme(Raj) 53 • India - Rajasthan
KAN SINGH
Board of Revenue, U.P. (7), State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Sudershan Deo (8) M. Devasahayam vs. State of Madras (9-a), A. Sambandhan vs. Regional Traffic Superintendent, Southern Railway Tiruchinapalli (9-b), N. Devashayam vs. State of Madras (10), M. Kamalamma vs. ... State of Mysore, by its chief Secretary, Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore (18) for showing that transfer of an incumbent from one cadre to another cannot be challenged, and lastly, he referred to N. Devashshayam vs. State....
1986 0 Supreme(MP) 292 • India - Madhya Pradesh
B.C.VARMA, C.P.SEN, S.S.SHARMA
No. 318/77 decided on 20-8-81 held that the truck had been engaged by Chainsingh for transporting 40 bags of wheat. Chainsingh and his son bharat Kumar were siting on the top of the loaded truck in order to see that the goods are safely transported. ... VIII of the Act. " A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court in State Insurance Officer Trivandrum vs. ... The truck overturned resulting in the death of Chainsing and injury to Bharat Kumar. Although both of them were not travelling for hire or reward on the truck but th....
1963 0 Supreme(MP) 128 • India - Madhya Pradesh
P.K.Tare
This petition is for setting aside the exparte order, dated, 26-3-1963 passed in Civil Revision No. 550 of 1962 Chainsingh and another Vs. Dulichand, Civil Revision No. 550 of 1962 and for a rehearing of the revision. ... Ramanuja, AIR 1951 Mad. 672, It may be true that the view taken by the Madras High Court is contrary. But so far as this Court is concerned, there is a Division Bench case of this Court, namely, Dhondiba Appasaheb and another Vs. ... The learned Judge considered the case law exhaustively and dissented from the view of the Madras....
1959 0 Supreme(Raj) 121 • India - Rajasthan
I.N.MODI
I may also point out here that the other case relied on by Sharma J. also does not represent the latest trend of authority in the Madras High Court. In Velur Devasthanam v. ... It is necessary to state a few facts in order to appreciate the point in controversy. The dispute relates to 30 Bighas of agricultural land attached to a well called Chainsing-wali-Kothi in the village Sogra Guwar. ... State, AIR 1955 All 46. ... State, ILR (1953) 3 Raj 270. ... Sambandamurthi, AIR 1952 Mad 531, Ramaswami, J. hel....
• India - Andhra Pradesh
GOPAL RAO EKBOTE, VENKATESWARA RAO
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE ACT, 1948 - Rule 17 of the Rules made under the Act is ultra vires to the powers of the State Government ... Whether Rule 17 of the Rules made under the Act is ultra vires to the powers of the State Government? 2. ... State Government has no power to prescribe limitation for an application under section 77(1) of the Act. ... Charia Abdulla & Company3, the vires of Rule 14(a) of the Rules made under the Madras General Sales Tax Act (IX of 1939) was challanged Section 19(1), whic....
2020 0 Supreme(MP) 129 • India - Madhya Pradesh
RAJENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
In support of his contention learned counsel for respondent-complainant cited the judgment of High Court of Madras in the case of N. Anbarasu Vs. M. Ganesan,2006 11 Lsws(Mad) 164 and judgment in the case of Tulsi Ram VS. Phoolwati,2013 4 MPLJ 85 . ... State of Gujarat and another, (2011) 13 SCC 316 has held as under:- "16. ... State of Gujarat and another, (2011) 13 SCC 316 . iv) Shivcharan VS. Jahid Khan passed in M.Cr.C. No. 5130/2019 dated 09.05.2019. ... State of Gujarat and another, (2012) 7 SCC 621 has held as....
1959 0 Supreme(Raj) 132 • India - Rajasthan
MODI
It is necessary to state a few facts in order to appreciate the point in controversy. The dispute relates to 30 Bighas of agricultural land attached to a well called Chainsingh-wali-kothi in the village Sofra Guwar. ... I may also point out here that the other case relied on by Sharma, J. also does not represent the latest trend of authority in the Madras High Court. ... dropped the proceedings, and that the Magistrate was not functus officio to pass such orders, and reliance was placed on the two decisions of the Madras....
1949 0 Supreme(Nagpur) 32 • India - Nagpur
BOSE, MANGALMURTI
Maida Bai Chainsingh ________|____________ w. Mt. Sigdor | | | Umraobai Kadubai Sigdarbai _________________________________________ | | Nawalsingh Chhatersingh ___________|_______________________________________ | | | | Umraosingh Motisingh Kishoresingh Sobhagsingh w. ... We are aware that there is a difference of opinion on the point as Sir Dinsha Mulla points out at p. 402 of Edn. 10 of his Principles of Hindu Law, but with all respect to the Bombay and Madras Judges, who take the other view, Ramalinga v. Virupakshi and Arumugha Chetty v. ... For that re....
2020 0 Supreme(MP) 120 • India - Madhya Pradesh
RAJENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
In support of his contention learned counsel for respondent-complainant cited the judgment of High Court of Madras in the case of N. Anbarasu Vs. M. Ganesan,2006 11 Lsws(Mad) 164 and judgment in the case of Tulsi Ram VS. Phoolwati,2013 4 MPLJ 85 . ... State of Gujarat and another, (2011) 13 SCC 316 has held as under:- "16. ... State of Gujarat and another, (2011) 13 SCC 316 . iv) Shivcharan VS. Jahid Khan passed in M.Cr.C. No. 5130/2019 dated 09.05.2019. ... State of Gujarat and another, (2012) 7 SCC 621 has held as....
Filter by Legal Phrase
