AI Overview...
-
Revisional Jurisdiction Validity - The petitioner challenged the revisional order, asserting it was invalid prior to a certain date. The case involved Seethadevi, who held full additional charge of the Joint Commissioner’s post and exercised revisional jurisdiction, highlighting issues of statutory power and appointment interpretation Tadikonda Pattabhiramachandra Rao VS State Of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh.
-
Scope of Revisional Power in Criminal Cases - Courts have clarified that the assessment of the sufficiency of material for conviction or the merits of the main controversy is generally outside the domain of revisional courts. Challenges to charge framing orders under Section 302 IPC or similar offences are permissible, but the revisional court's power is limited, especially regarding factual evaluation of the material KHAJJANSINGH VS STATE OF M. P. - Madhya Pradesh, Shahnawaz Baba VS State of Jammu and Kashmir - Crimes.
-
Challenging Charge Framing in Revision - Multiple rulings confirm that orders framing charges can be challenged through revisional jurisdiction. However, the bar under Section 435(4-a) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) restricts interference once charges are framed, unless procedural or legal errors are evident. For example, in cases involving charges under Section 302 RPC, the court recognized the petitioner’s ability to invoke revisional jurisdiction but also acknowledged limitations Shahnawaz Baba VS State of Jammu and Kashmir - Crimes, Daljit Singh VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana, Shahnawaz Baba VS State Of J. &K. - Jammu and Kashmir.
-
Inherent Jurisdiction and Post-Charge Challenges - The High Court can exercise inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to quash FIRs or charges after framing, but only under specific conditions. Once charges are framed, challenging the order through revision is permissible, but courts generally restrict re-examination of factual sufficiency unless procedural errors are identified Daljit Singh VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Alteration of Charges and Challenges - Altering charges after framing is permissible if challenged in other proceedings. The courts have recognized that such modifications are subject to judicial review, especially when challenged in revision petitions, even if already under challenge elsewhere Hastimal Chaplot VS State of Rajasthan - Crimes, Sanjay Yadav And Anr. vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh.
-
Revoking or Challenging Discharge and Subsequent Charge Framing - Challenges to orders rejecting discharge do not bar subsequent framing of charges. Courts exercising revisional jurisdiction can examine the legality and correctness of such orders, maintaining that the right to challenge is preserved even after charges are framed Prakash S/o Murlidhar Bhishikar VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively establish that while the framing of charges is generally susceptible to challenge through revisional jurisdiction, courts are cautious about re-evaluating factual sufficiency or merits, focusing instead on procedural legality and jurisdictional correctness. The scope of revisional powers is limited by statutory provisions like Section 435(4-a) CrPC, which restricts interference post-charge framing, but exceptions exist where procedural errors or jurisdictional issues are involved. Courts also recognize their inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to quash charges or FIRs even after framing, provided the grounds are valid. Overall, the challenge to charge orders in revisional jurisdiction hinges on procedural legality rather than merits, and the courts uphold the principle that such orders can be scrutinized within defined limits.
Search Results for "Charge Order Challenged Revisional Jurisdiction"
1994 0 Supreme(AP) 181 • India - Andhra Pradesh
M.N.RAO, T.N.C.RANGA RAJAN
The petitioner challenged the revisional order, claiming it was not valid prior to a specific date. ... Seethadevi, Deputy Commissioner, held full additional charge of the post of Joint Commissioner and exercised revisional jurisdiction ... Statutory Power - Revisional Jurisdiction - Interpretation of Appointment and Statutory Power Fact of the Case: Ms ... Seethadevi during the period when she held full additional charge of the po....
1996 0 Supreme(MP) 187 • India - Madhya Pradesh
T.S.DOABIA
IN REVISIONAL JURISDICTION. ... is not within the domain of the court when exercising revisional jurisdiction. ... Fact of the Case: Petitioners challenged an order framing a charge under S. 307 read with S. 149 of the IPC against ... Assessment of sufficiency of material for basing conviction for a particular charge is not within the domain of the Court when revisional jurisdiction is being exercised. Hon'ble Sh....
• India - Crimes
G.L.RAINA
framing of charges for a major offence was open to interference in revisional jurisdiction. ... Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 435 (4-a) - Challenge to order of framing charge based upon merits of main controversy – ... Bar under section would be attracted - Charge framed against petitioners under Section 302 RPC - Contention that death of deceased ... Municipality Jammu and others1 that the bar created by subsection (4-a) of Section 435 of the Code of Crimin....
1998 0 Supreme(P&H) 838 • India - Punjab and Haryana
B.RAI
The court further held that the petitioners could have challenged the order framing the charges by invoking the revisional jurisdiction ... Whether the High Court could invoke its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash the charges ... CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - SECTION 482 - QUASHING OF FIR - CONDITIONS - FIR CANNOT BE QUASHED AFTER FRAMING OF CHARGE - INHERENT ... Concededly the order framing....
1999 0 Supreme(J&K) 131 • India - Jammu and Kashmir
G.L.RAINA
Criminal Procedure Code - Section 435 - Revision - Whether revision can be filed against order framing charge under Section 302 RPC ... Municipality Jammu and others (1982 KLJ 439) that the bar created by sub-section (4-a) of Section 435 of the Code of Criminal Procedure would be attracted where an order of framing the charge is challenged under the revisional jurisdiction of the court. ... State and Ors. 1986 J&K Law Reporter, 688 the court held that an ord....
• India - Crimes
GOPAL KRISHNA VYAS
but said petition was dismissed—Petitioner could not be permitted to invoke revisional jurisdiction challenging order of charge—No ... that offence was compoundable and petitioner had deposited Rs. 2,50,000—Order of cognizance was earlier challenged by petitioner ... Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 397—Revision against order for framing charge under Section 39 Indian Electricity Act on plea ... Upon perusal of the said order, ....
2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 18910 • India - High Court of Madhya Pradesh
to alter the charge was not erroneous in light of the fact that the order framing the charge was already being challenged in other ... However, the court also noted that the order framing the charge was already being challenged in other revision petitions. ... CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - SECTION 216 - ALTERATION OF CHARGE - SUBJECT TO CHALLENGE Fact of the Case: The applicants ... Once the order of framing of #HL_ST....
• India - Crimes
ASHIM KUMAR ROY
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 227 & 228—Order of framing charge U/s 306 & 498A against husband, parents and three brothers—Revision ... material prima facie justified framing of charge—Prosecution case was that victim committed suicide being unable to bear torture ... by accused other than husband—Since framing of charge affected personal liberty of citizen, it was duty of Court to consider whether ... —In the instant criminal revisional application invoking inherent jurisdiction#HL_EN....
2019 0 Supreme(Cal) 204 • India - Calcutta
DEBANGSU BASAK
Fact of the Case: The petitioner challenged the charge sheet, report of the enquiry officer, order of punishment, order ... of the appellate authority, and order of the revisional authority. ... RULES, 1987, RULE 151, RULE 152] - The court discussed the jurisdiction of the Assistant Security Commissioner to issue the charge ... The petitioner has challenged the charge sheet dated February 10, 2010, the report of ....
2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 691 • India - Bombay
INDIRA JAIN
-Since applicant challenged order rejecting application for discharge hence subsequent framing of charge would not take away his ... -Court, in exercise of its Revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 401 of Code, can examine correctness and legality of impugned ... jurisdiction. ... This court finds that as applicant has challenged the order of discharge, subsequent framing of charge would not take away his right to impugn th....
Filter by Legal Phrase
