AI Overview...
-
Chaurangi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. - Name Change and Background
The company was originally known as Reatox Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., which officially changed its name to Chaurangi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. on June 1, 2012. The development agreement terms and conditions between the parties were based on this entity. Chaurangi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Formerly known as Reatox Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. VS Maharashtra Airport Development Company Ltd. (MADC) - Bombay, REATOX BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. NEW KNOWN AS CHOURANGI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. vs SMT. POONAM W.O. JAYPRAKASH SHARMA - Consumer State -
Legal Cases and Judicial References
Multiple court judgments have referenced Chaurangi Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd., notably in cases involving Maharashtra Airport Authority, Maharashtra Airport Development Co., and other authorities. These rulings have upheld the validity of agreements and addressed disputes related to development projects, arbitration, and contractual obligations. Notable cases include decisions dated 2013 and 2021, which affirmed the company's involvement and contractual commitments. Srushti Raj Enterprise (india) Ltd VS Tilak Safalya Co-operative Housing Societies Ltd - Bombay, B. E. Billimoria & Company Limited VS Mahindra Bebanco Developers Ltd. - Bombay, Liberty Garden CHS Ltd, Mumbai VS K T Group, Mumbai - Bombay, Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-op Hsg Soc Ltd VS Value Projects Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay, Nirmal Infrastructure Private Limited VS Aanant Developers Private Limited - Bombay -
Disputes and Consumer Cases
Chaurangi Builders has been involved in consumer disputes, including allegations of insufficient payments and forged documents, as well as cases of cancellation of flat bookings. The courts have generally found in favor of consumers when builders failed to justify cancellations or when there was deficiency in service. An example is the cancellation of a flat in 2009, which was deemed unjustified. Shree Ganesh Developers Co. vs Mr. Bomma Gopal Ramlu - Consumer National -
Project and Agreement Details
The company issued allotment letters to flat purchasers and entered into lease agreements covered under relevant laws. A tripartite agreement was executed involving MADC, Chaurangi, and NIT for project takeover, indicating structured project management and transfer processes. Nagpur Integrated Township Pvt. Ltd. VS Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Mumbai - Bombay
Analysis and Conclusion
Chaurangi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., formerly Reatox Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., is a recognized entity involved in real estate development, with multiple legal and judicial references validating its contractual activities. The company has faced disputes related to project execution and consumer rights, with courts emphasizing adherence to legal obligations and fairness in transactions. Overall, the entity's legal history underscores its active role in development projects and the importance of compliance with contractual and statutory norms.
Search Results for "Chaurangi Builders"
2013 0 Supreme(Bom) 2361 • India - Bombay
R.D.DHANUKA
On 1 June 2012 name of the petitioner was changed from Reatox Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. to Chourangi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. ... Name of M/s Reatox Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. was changed with the new name M/s Chaurangi Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd., the appellant herein. The Terms and Conditions of the development agreement were recorded in the said agreement entered into by and between the parties. ... On 26 April 2006, M/s Reatox Builders an....
2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2519 • India - Bombay
NARESH H.PATIL, G.S.KULKARNI
The learned single Judge has rightly referred to a decision in case of Chaurangi Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Maharashtra Airport Authority Company Ltd. in Arbitration Petition (L.) ... The learned single Judge has rightly adverted to the decision in case of Chaurangi Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. in rejecting the said contention of the appellant. 13.
2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 569 • India - Bombay
R.D.DHANUKA
This Court also adverted to the judgment of this Court in case of Chaurangi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs .Maharashtra Airport Development Co.
2020 0 Supreme(Bom) 130 • India - Bombay
R.D.DHANUKA
Sukushal Builders and Developers and Ors. ,2016 SCCOnLineBom 3366. (x) Judgment of this Court in case of Chaurangi Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. v/s. Maharashtra Airport Development Company Ltd. ,2013 SCCOnLineBom 1530. ... Union of Territory of Chandigarh (supra) and in the case of Associate Builders v/s. Delhi Development Authority (supra) relied upon by the learned counsel for the claimant would apply to the facts of this case. ... Kumar Builders Mumbai Realty Private Limited ,2015 SCCOnLineBom....
2021 0 Supreme(Bom) 906 • India - Bombay
G.S.PATEL
The first petition was filed by the Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative Housing Society Ltd (Society) against the respondent builder, ... 4 This was also the view taken in Chaurangi Builders and Developers Pvt Ltd v Maharashtra Airport Development Company Ltd,2013 SCCOnlineBom 1530. 5 Arbitration Petition (L) No 8189 of 2020 and connected matters, decided on 11th February 2021. ... The Meeti Developers Appeal Court also referred to the decisions in Jal Ratan Deep Cooperative Housing Society Ltd vs Kumar Builders Mumbai Rea....
2015 0 Supreme(Bom) 1948 • India - Bombay
R.D.DHANUKA
This Court in Chaurangi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra Airport Development Co. Ltd. in its judgment dated 29th November, 2013 in Arbitration Petition (Lodging) No.1999 of 2013 after adverting to the judgment of the Supreme Court in case of Cox & Kings India Limited Vs.
2025 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 2941 • India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
A.P. Sahi, PRESIDENT, Bharatkumar Pandya, MEMBER
Builders claimed payments were insufficient and alleged forged documents from the respondent. ... (A) Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section not specifically cited - Deficiency in service - Builders cancelled booking of flat due ... ... ... Ratio Decidendi: Court affirmed the finding of the State Commission that cancellation was unjustified as builders did not ... It is admitted to the complainant that on 30.01.2009, the complainant learnt that opposite party has cancelled the allotment of unit 1205 in the building “Chaurang#....
2020 0 Supreme(Bom) 1138 • India - Bombay
S.C.GUPTE
Chourangi Builders & Developers Pvt Ltd (“Chourangi”), was the original developer, who had issued allotment letters to the allottee flat purchasers contesting these appeals and who had entered into agreements for lease, covered by the Act, with them. ... A tripartite agreement was thereupon entered into between MADC, Chourangi and NIT for taking over of the project by the latter. ... Only after such appreciation could the Appellate Tribunal have passed a pre-deposit order either against Chourangi or aga....
2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 10229 • India - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Mrs. Kalyani S. Kapse, CJ, Ms. Shaila D. Wandhare, J
• India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
REATOX BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. NEW KNOWN AS CHOURANGI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI. ATUL D.
Filter by Legal Phrase
