AI Overview...
-
Maintainability of Suit under Order 37 CPC - A suit under Order 37 of the CPC for recovery of dishonored cheques is generally not maintainable if the cheque has ceased to be valid or if the suit is filed after the death of the drawer without proper legal procedures. Courts have found that suits based on cheques issued from deceased drawers or after cheques have become invalid are often not maintainable Vijay Singh VS Manali Malik - Delhi.
-
Conditions for Filing Suit under Order 37 - A suit under Order 37 requires strict compliance with procedural rules, including proper presentation of original documents and timely filing. The court emphasizes that the suit must be accompanied by original documents, and the defendant must be given an opportunity to defend, especially in cases involving dishonored cheques or bills of exchange GOYAL MG GASES LTD. VS PREMIUM INTERNATIONAL FINANCE LTD. - Delhi.
-
Procedure for Leave to Defend - The defendant has the right to seek leave to defend the suit, which involves demonstrating a valid defense. Delay in appearance or failure to comply with procedural requirements under Order 37 can lead to the dismissal of the defense or the suit itself. Courts consider whether the defendant has established special circumstances or triable issues to justify granting leave Mukesh Jain VS Akash Gupta - Delhi.
-
Setting Aside Ex Parte Orders - The courts have discussed the provisions under Order 37 Rules 2, 3, and 7 regarding setting aside ex parte orders, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance and the right of the defendant to be heard. Delay or non-compliance can result in the order being upheld or set aside based on the circumstances Dlf Pramerica Life Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Dev Comptech Pvt. Ltd. - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Specific Cases on Cheque Disputes - In cases involving dishonored cheques, courts have held that the suit is maintainable only if the cheque was validly issued, and the defendant has a genuine defense. The courts also examine whether the plaintiff has proved the issuance and dishonor of the cheque with proper evidence. Failure to produce original documents or demonstrate the validity of the cheque can lead to dismissal SUNITA SHARMA VS SANTOSH SHUKLA - Delhi, Sangeeta Jewels Pvt. Ltd. VS Ajay Kumar Jain - Delhi.
-
Summary of Insights - Overall, a suit under Order 37 CPC for recovery based on cheques is permissible but subject to strict procedural adherence, including proper presentation of original documents and timely filing. The defendant's right to defend must be balanced with procedural requirements, and suits filed after the expiry of the cheque's validity or without proper evidence are often dismissed.
References: - Vijay Singh VS Manali Malik - Delhi - Vijay Singh VS Manali Malik - Dishonour Of Cheque - Dlf Pramerica Life Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Dev Comptech Pvt. Ltd. - Punjab and Haryana - Skylink Construction Pvt. Ltd. VS Sachin Mittal - Delhi - SUNITA SHARMA VS SANTOSH SHUKLA - Delhi - Sangeeta Jewels Pvt. Ltd. VS Ajay Kumar Jain - Delhi - Mukesh Jain VS Akash Gupta - Delhi - N. K. SHARMA VS K. G. ARYA - Delhi - GOYAL MG GASES LTD. VS PREMIUM INTERNATIONAL FINANCE LTD. - Delhi - Ankit Sharma VS Shilpi Arora - Delhi
Search Results for "Cheque Memo Not Required under Order 37 Cpc"
2009 0 Supreme(Del) 539 • India - Delhi
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
37 of the CPC not maintainable. ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the suit under Order 37 of the CPC was not maintainable as the cheques ceased ... the maintainability of a suit under Order 37 of the CPC for recovery of dishonored cheques presented after the death of the drawer ... Under Section 31, the liability of the bank as drawee of the cheque#HL_END....
• India - Dishonour Of Cheque
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
... (ii) Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Order 37—Suit ... to the bank after drawer’s death—Suit under Order 37 is not maintainable—An opportunity of defence must be afforded to the defendants—Application ... —Held: Cheques were issued from 3 different cheque books—Drawer was too poor to draw the post-dated cheques—Cheques were presented ... Under Section 31, the liability of the Bank as drawee of the cheque#H....
2018 0 Supreme(P&H) 3698 • India - Punjab and Haryana
RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Order 37 CPC - Setting Aside Ex Parte Order - Order 37 Rule 2, Order 37 Rule 3, Order 37 Rule 7 - The court discussed the provisions ... Issues: Delay in appearance, setting aside ex parte order, compliance with Order 37 CPC procedures. ... of Order 37 Rule 2, Rule 3, and Rule 7 of the Civil Proced....
2022 0 Supreme(Del) 520 • India - Delhi
V. KAMESWAR RAO
Hence the claim of the plaintiffs against defendant No.1 was maintainable under Order XXXVII CPC. ... Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order XXXVII – Rule 3 and 4 - Section 49 - Sale Deed - Collaboration agreement ... (Para 36) Finding of the court : When admittedly the Order XXXVII CPC suit qua defendant ... or the dishonourd bill of exchange or cheque. ... CRP 472/2003 decided on January 14, 2008 has in Para 9 held as under: “Indeed, an application under Order....
2018 0 Supreme(Del) 179 • India - Delhi
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
come out with the true facts - Grant of a decree under Order 37 based on a cheque - Background of the issuance of the cheque ought ... Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 37 - Recovery - Leave to defend - Not depositing the amount - Condonation ... of the case is correct - Evidence is required to be led - Defendant has deposited a sum of Rs. 7,50,000/- - Same is lying in an ... Thus, it appears that this is not a st....
2008 0 Supreme(Del) 149 • India - Delhi
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
The court found that the petitioners failed to demonstrate the existence of special circumstances and triable issues as required ... under Rule 4 of Order 37. ... CPC against the petitioners for recovery of Rs.1,72,000 based on three cheques. ... Learned counsel for the petitioners has not even bothered to aver in the application under Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC and in the instant petition that petitioner no.2 stood at par with petitioner no.3 and tha....
2014 0 Supreme(Del) 767 • India - Delhi
G.S.SISTANI
Cheque Dishonour - Application for Leave to Defend - Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - 37 Rule 2 & 3 CPC - 8 ... 1908 for dishonour of a cheque. ... , 9, 10, 13, 14, 15 Fact of the Case: The plaintiff filed a suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, ... What is required to be examined for grant of leave is whether the defence taken in the application under Order XXXVII Rule 3 #HL_S....
2003 0 Supreme(Del) 756 • India - Delhi
R.S.SODHI
defence - Recovery Suit - Order 37, CPC - [Section 5 of the Limitation Act, Order 37 Rule 3, CPC] - The court discussed the appellant's ... failure to enter defence within ten days of receiving notice under Order 37 Rule 3, CPC. ... Fact of the Case: The respondent filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 46,000 under Order 37, CPC. ... The plaintiff deposited the cheque#HL_E....
2006 0 Supreme(Del) 1248 • India - Delhi
GITA MITTAL
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 37 Rules 3(7) & 4 - Suit based upon written agreement — It is a duty of the Court to satisfy ... that the suit was maintainable even if the defendant is ex parte — Suit not accompanied by original documents but merely photocopy ... A suit under order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure is necessarily required to be accompanied by the original documents which are the basis of the claim before the court. ... In this ....
2018 0 Supreme(Del) 2837 • India - Delhi
VALMIKI J.MEHTA
dispute the dishonored cheque bearing his signature. ... Leave to Defend - Civil Procedure - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) - Section 96 - Order XXXVII CPC - 1 SCC 568 Fact ... The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of the loan amount. ... vide Return Memo dated 02.05.2015, and therefore, the subject suit was filed under Order XXXVII CPC. ... The trial court has dismissed the....
Filter by Legal Phrase
