AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Consumer Forums are empowered under Section 40 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to review their own judgments. This review authority is reinforced by legislative amendments aimed at strengthening consumer rights. While the power is recognized and upheld by courts, it is subject to procedural limitations. Overall, the law facilitates consumer forums to correct or modify their decisions, ensuring justice and accountability in consumer dispute resolution EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED VS AFTAB SINGH - Supreme Court, C. Venkatachalam VS Ajitkumar C. Shah - Orissa, Jaya Foods, represented through its Proprietor Indrajit Vishwakarma VS State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Odisha, Cuttack - Orissa.

Search Results for "Consumer Forum can Review its own Judgement under Section 40"

Shree Shyam Steel, Ramgarh through its partner Shri Deepak Raj Mangalam VS Damodar Valley Corporation, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director

2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 257 India - Jharkhand

RAJESH SHANKAR

acts for purpose – Review petition dismissed. ... Establishment of Forum for Redressal of Grievances of Consumers, Electricity Ombudsman and Consumer Advocacy) Regulations, 2020 ... Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 42(5) - Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Guidelines for ... I am of the view that the judgement of the learned Division Bench will not be applicable to the case of the review petitioner as the said judgment (L.P.A No. 08 o....

Kisan Cold Storage & Ice Factory Thru Partner 6114(M/S)2012 VS Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd.

2019 0 Supreme(All) 693 India - Allahabad

ABDUL MOIN, RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, VIKRAM NATH

Section 181 – section 18 – section 36 – section 40Section 42 (5) (6) and (7) - Regulations, 2007 have been framed by the ... 181 read with sub-section (5) to (8) of Section 42 of the Act, 2003, which only pertains to establishment of a Forum for redressal ... India or is not manifestly arbitrary or unreasonable – Regulation 8.1(i) of the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Consumer ... It is set....

Rajeev Hitendra Pathak VS Achyut Kashinath Karekar

2011 8 Supreme 120 India - Supreme Court

After the amendment in Section 22 and introduction of Section 22A in the Act in the year 2002 by which the power of review or recall ... Consumer Protection Act,1986-Sections 22 ,22A-Power to Recall - Whether the District Consumer ... The amendment in Section 22 and introduction of Section 22-A were done for the convenience of the consumers. ... After the amendment in Section 22 and introduction of Sectio....

C.  Venkatachalam VS Ajitkumar C.  Shah

2011 0 Supreme(Ori) 280 India - Orissa

DALVEER BHANDARI, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, ANIL R.DAVE

before consumer fora but this privilege cannot be claimed as a matter of right by anyone else - Consumer Forum has the right to ... Forums - Appearance of authorised agents is not inconsistent with Section 33 of the Advocates Act, 1961 - The functioning, conduct ... CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 - Advocates Act - Consumer Protection Rules - Party to appear either personally or through an 'agent ... Section 29 of the Advocates Act, 1961 recognised advocates as class of....

Rajeev Hitendra Pathak VS Achyut Kashinath Karekar

India - Consumer

DALVEER BHANDARI, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, ANIL R.DAVE

Consumer Protection Act,1986—Sections 22,22A—Power to Recall — Whether the District Consumer Forums and the State Commissions have ... After the amendment in Section 22 and introduction of Section 22A in the Act in the year 2002 by which the power of review or recall ... The amendment in Section 22 and introduction of Section 22-A were done for the convenience of the consumers. ... After the amendment in Section 22....

Jaya Foods, represented through its Proprietor Indrajit Vishwakarma VS State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Odisha, Cuttack

2016 0 Supreme(Ori) 623 India - Orissa

D.P.CHOUDHURY

Writ Petition - Consumer Insurance Dispute - Section 17(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 18, 19 of the ... Legislative amendments to empower District Forum and State Commission to review or recall their own orders Ratio Decidendi: ... The court also suggested legislative amendments to empower the District Forum and State Commission to review or recall their own ... After the amendment in Section 22 and introdu....

Anirban Chakraborty VS State Of West Bengal

2019 0 Supreme(Cal) 908 India - Calcutta

SHAMPA SARKAR

It found that the deed of gift was not conditional and did not fall under Section 23 of the Act. ... Fraud, Coercion, and Undue Influence - Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Section 23 Fact ... Issues: Jurisdiction of the Maintenance Tribunal, Violation of Natural Justice, Applicability of Section 23 of the Act ... The Act provides for "business-to- consumer" disputes and not for "business-to-business" disputes. ... Any consumer can go and file a complaint. Complaint n....

EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED VS AFTAB SINGH

2018 0 Supreme(SC) 1235 India - Supreme Court

UDAY UMESH LALIT, ASHOK BHUSHAN

(a) Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 3 r/w section 8 ( ... The appellant has filed these review petitions to review these judgments. ... does not require review. ... The appellant has filed these review petitions to review the judgment of this Court. ... JUDGMENT ... ASHOK BHUSHAN,J. ... These review petitions have been filed seeking review of the judgment#HL_E....

Rajinder Kumar Agarwal VS Union Of India

2022 0 Supreme(Del) 594 India - Delhi

NAVIN CHAWLA

Act, 1894 – Section 4 - Legal Heirs - Seeking Review And Modification Of Order - Arbitrator - Whether provisions ‘relating to determination ... In case, the submission of the review applicants on the effect of the RAA is to be accepted, there will be no forum where the pending ... Resettlement of Displaced Persons (Land Acquisition) Act, 1948 - Section 7(1)(b) - Right to Fair Compensation ... Jai Prakash Associates Ltd., (2022) 2 SCC 161, the Supreme Court has recently considered the effect of #HL_START....

Rajinder Kumar Agarwal VS Union Of India

2022 0 Supreme(Del) 990 India - Delhi

NAVIN CHAWLA

Jurisdiction - RAA Repeal Effect Fact of the Case: The Review Petition sought to recall the Order dated 21.01.2020, ... The Court entertained the Review Petition and appointed an Amicus Curiae to assist, who argued that the LARR Act's provisions should ... The Court directed the Arbitrator to determine the compensation expeditiously, preferably within six months, and disposed of the Review ... Jai Prakash Associates Ltd., (2022) 2 SCC 161, the Supreme Court has recently considered the effect of Section 6 of the General ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top