AI Overview...
- Kailash Kumar Case - Main points and insights:
-
The petitioner in Criminal Appeal No. 861/2025 filed for cancellation of certain proceedings, citing the Supreme Court decision in Kailash Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. Criminal Appeal No. 861/2025 as a precedent. The case involves issues related to procedural or substantive aspects of criminal law, emphasizing the importance of adherence to legal principles established by the Supreme Court Tasso Murte Opo, Son of Late Tasso Grayu vs State of AP represented by the PP of AP - Gauhati.
-
Judicial observations and legal principles:
-
Several references highlight the jurisdictional and evidentiary considerations in criminal appeals, such as the assertion that some cases, like Sukhdev Yadav's, are cases of no evidence, reaffirmed by judgments including Criminal Appeal No. 472/1985 and Criminal Appeal No. 67/2008 Sukhdev Yadav VS State - Delhi, Vishal Yadav VS State of U. P. - Delhi, VISHAL YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. - Delhi.
-
Multiple criminal appeals:
-
Various appeals (e.g., Appeal No.1598/2013, No.1710/2012, No.1862/2012) involve different accused parties, indicating ongoing legal proceedings with multiple facets, including challenges to convictions, identification, and procedural errors STATE OF GUJARAT vs NARESH AGARSINH CHHARA - Gujarat, SANTOSHKUMAR KODUMAL MULCHANDANI vs STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat, KIRPALSINGH JUNGBAHADURSINGH CHHABADA vs STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat.
-
Analysis and conclusion:
- The core issue in the Kailash Kumar case revolves around the validity of procedural steps and the reliance on Supreme Court judgments to support the petitioner’s plea for cancellation. The references collectively underscore the importance of evidence sufficiency and jurisdictional correctness in criminal appeals. The case exemplifies how higher courts scrutinize procedural adherence and evidentiary adequacy, reaffirming the principles laid down in landmark judgments.
References: - Paras 9, 24, 33 of source Tasso Murte Opo, Son of Late Tasso Grayu vs State of AP represented by the PP of AP - Gauhati - Criminal Appeal No. 861/2025 (Kailash Kumar case) - Multiple appeals and judgments cited in sources Sukhdev Yadav VS State - Delhi, Vishal Yadav VS State of U. P. - Delhi, VISHAL YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. - Delhi, STATE OF GUJARAT vs NARESH AGARSINH CHHARA - Gujarat, SANTOSHKUMAR KODUMAL MULCHANDANI vs STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat, KIRPALSINGH JUNGBAHADURSINGH CHHABADA vs STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat
Search Results for "Criminal Appeal no 861 2025 Kailash Kumar Special Leave Case no 713 2025"
2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 1018 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Mitali Thakuria
(Paras 9, 24, 33) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The petitioner filed for cancellation ... To substantiate his plea, he cited the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Kailash Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. [Criminal Appeal No. 861/2025 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) ... , [Criminal Appeal No. 861 of 2022 (arising out ....
2023 0 Supreme(Del) 349 • India - Delhi
J. R. MIDHA, GITA MITTAL
State of Punjab passed in Criminal Appeal No. 472/1985. ... Ravinder Kumar Kapoor, Advocate for Sukhdev Yadav in Criminal Appeal No. 145/2012 contends that so far as Sukhdev Yadav is concerned, it is a case of no evidence. Mr. ... A similar view has been reiterated in a recent judgment of this Court in Criminal Appeal No. 67 of 2008, Jagroop Singh v. ... Appeal No. 145/2012. ... Jurisdiction of the appellate court dealing with a #H....
2014 0 Supreme(Del) 1026 • India - Delhi
GITA MITTAL, J.R.MIDHA
State of Punjab passed in Criminal Appeal No. 472/1985. ... Ravinder Kumar Kapoor, Advocate for Sukhdev Yadav in Criminal Appeal No. 145/2012 contends that so far as Sukhdev Yadav is concerned, it is a case of no evidence. Mr. ... A similar view has been reiterated in a recent judgment of this Court in Criminal Appeal No. 67 of 2008, Jagroop Singh v. ... ... Jurisdiction of the appellate court dealing with a criminal appe....
• India - Delhi High Court
State of Punjab passed in Criminal Appeal No. 472/1985. ... Jurisdiction of the appellate court dealing with a criminal appeal 85. ... Mr.Ravinder Kumar Kapoor, Advocate for Sukhdev Yadav in Criminal Appeal No. 145/2012 contends that so far as Sukhdev Yadav is concerned, it is a case of no evidence. Mr. ... X Challenge to the identity of the recovered dead body by Sukhdev @ Pehalwan in Criminal Appe....
• India - Gujarat
Appeal No.1598 of 2013; the accused No.37 has filed appeal No.18 has filed an appeal being Criminal Appeal No.1710 of appeal being Criminal Appeal No.1709 of 2012; the accused 2012; the accused No.58 has filed Criminal Appeal No.1862 of has preferred Criminal Appeal No.1598 of 2013 for p style="position:absolute
• India - Gujarat
Appeal No.1598 of 2013; the accused No.37 has filed appeal No.18 has filed an appeal being Criminal Appeal No.1710 of appeal being Criminal Appeal No.1709 of 2012; the accused 2012; the accused No.58 has filed Criminal Appeal No.1862 of has preferred Criminal Appeal No.1598 of 2013 for p style="position:absolute
• India - Gujarat
Appeal No.1598 of 2013; the accused No.37 has filed appeal No.18 has filed an appeal being Criminal Appeal No.1710 of appeal being Criminal Appeal No.1709 of 2012; the accused 2012; the accused No.58 has filed Criminal Appeal No.1862 of has preferred Criminal Appeal No.1598 of 2013 for p style="position:absolute
Filter by Legal Phrase
