AI Overview...
- Essential Supply or Service - Main points and insights
- The law prohibits landlords from cutting off or withholding essential supplies (such as electricity, water, or other vital services) without just and sufficient cause. Multiple sources (e.g., Sirajunnisha VS Sukhjeet Singh - Chhattisgarh, MARTIN BURN LIMITED VS KRISHNA ABBI - Delhi, Usha International Ltd. VS Jamuna Prasad. - Madhya Pradesh, Mahendra Singh VS M. P. Electricity Board - Madhya Pradesh) emphasize that such acts are unlawful unless authorized by proper legal procedures.
- The courts have consistently held that the obligation to provide essential services is fundamental, and any disconnection without proper cause constitutes a violation of tenant rights (LACHHMAN BHATIA VS N. K. MEHRA - Delhi, Kusumbai VS Padmabai - Madhya Pradesh).
- The relevant statutes, such as the Rent Control Acts and the Accommodation Control Act, specify that landlords must not intentionally disconnect or withhold essential services, and any such act can be challenged in courts or rent authorities (Haji Mahomed Haji Alli Mahomed VS State - Bombay, Usha International Ltd. VS Jamuna Prasad. - Madhya Pradesh, Mahendra Singh VS M. P. Electricity Board - Madhya Pradesh).
- Disconnection or withholding of essential services is only permissible if ordered by a competent authority or court, and wrongful disconnection can lead to restoration orders and penalties (Haji Mahomed Haji Alli Mahomed VS State - Bombay, LACHHMAN BHATIA VS N. K. MEHRA - Delhi, Mahendra Singh VS M. P. Electricity Board - Madhya Pradesh).
-
The term amenities is considered synonymous with essential services, and the law does not distinguish between them in this context (VIRA RAI VS S. P. SACHDEVA - Delhi).
-
Analysis and Conclusion
- The legal framework uniformly prohibits landlords from unilaterally disconnecting essential supplies without proper legal authority or just cause. Courts have reinforced that such acts violate tenant rights and can be subject to legal remedies, including restoration orders.
- Any disconnection must follow due process, and landlords are accountable for wrongful withholding, which can be challenged before rent controllers or courts.
- The statutes aim to protect tenants’ right to essential services, and violations can result in legal penalties and orders for reinstatement of supplies.
- Overall, the consensus across the sources is that cutting off or withholding essential supply or service without lawful justification is illegal and subject to legal remedy.
References: - Sirajunnisha VS Sukhjeet Singh - Chhattisgarh, MARTIN BURN LIMITED VS KRISHNA ABBI - Delhi, Haji Mahomed Haji Alli Mahomed VS State - Bombay, DHANRAJMAL GOBINDRAM AND CO. (P. ) LTD. VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - Bombay, Usha International Ltd. VS Jamuna Prasad. - Madhya Pradesh, LACHHMAN BHATIA VS N. K. MEHRA - Delhi, VIRA RAI VS S. P. SACHDEVA - Delhi, Mahendra Singh VS M. P. Electricity Board - Madhya Pradesh, Kusumbai VS Padmabai - Madhya Pradesh, Narendra Gupta VS Sharda Saran Shrivastava - Madhya Pradesh
Search Results for "Cutting Off or Withholding Essential Supply or Service"
2002 0 Supreme(Chh) 82 • India - Chhattisgarh
FAKHRUDDIN
off or withholding essential supply or service without just and sufficient cause. ... supply electricity to the premises within three days, emphasizing the tenant's right to essential services and the landlord's duty ... Issues: Disconnection of electricity supply to the tenant's premises, tenant's right to essential services, landlord's duty ... Section 38 of the Act prescribes 'Cuttin....
1989 0 Supreme(Del) 443 • India - Delhi
RENT CONTROL ACT - SECTION 45 - CUTTING OFF OR WITHHOLDING ESSENTIAL SUPPLY OR SERVICE - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION - LANDLORD'S ... The court held that the cutting off or withholding of essential supply would be attributable to the landlord if it is within his ... Whether the cutting off or withholding of essential #HL_ST....
1952 0 Supreme(Bom) 3 • India - Bombay
H.K.CHAINANI, R.S.BAVDEKAR
off or withholding any essential supply or service, unless he has first applied to the Small Causes Court for a direction for the ... off essential supply or service - No obligation to approach civil court for restoration first. ... Sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 24 provide for the restoration of the essential supply or service, which has been wrongfully ... ... These obser....
1972 0 Supreme(Bom) 109 • India - Bombay
D.G.DESHPANDE
Finding of the Court: The court held that the landlords were not guilty of cutting off or withholding an essential ... supply or service under Section 24(1) of the Rent Act. ... Whether the landlords' omission to repair or replace the lift amounted to withholding an essential service? ... The section speaks of (1) either the landlord himself cutting off or withholding such #HL_....
1997 0 Supreme(MP) 730 • India - Madhya Pradesh
R.S.GARG
ACCOMMODATION CONTROL ACT - SECTION 38 - INTERPRETATION - LANDLORD'S DUTY TO PROVIDE ESSENTIAL SERVICES - SCOPE - OBSTRUCTION ... as the plaintiff's claim did not fall within the ambit of Section 38 of the Act, which deals with the landlord's duty to provide essential ... services to the tenant. 3. ... Cutting off or withholding essential supply of service- (1) No landlord either himself or through any person purpo....
1998 0 Supreme(Del) 665 • India - Delhi
C.M.NAYAR
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Section 45 — Disconnection of essential supplies — Rent Controller not granting interim relief of ... Cutting off or withholding essential supply or service. (1) No landlord either himself or through any person purporting to act on his behalf shall without just and sufficient cause cut off or withhold any essential supply or service enjoyed by the tenant in respect o....
1984 0 Supreme(Del) 142 • India - Delhi
D.K.KAPUR, D.P.WADHWA
supply of Seryices and the word "amenities" and was using the same indicating that the meaning was the same. ... amenities" in Sub-section (3) of Section 45 seems to indicate that the legislature was not making any distinction between the phrase Essential ... It reads : ... "cutting off or withholding essential supply or service- (1) No landlord either himself or through any person purporting to act on his behalf shall without just and sufficient cau....
1996 0 Supreme(MP) 984 • India - Madhya Pradesh
T.S.DOABIA, A.S.TRIPATHI
Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Section 38 - Essential supply or service - Interpretation - Landlord cannot cut off or withhold ... essential supply or service enjoyed by the tenant without just and sufficient cause - Rent Controlling Authority can order restoration ... of such supply or service - Electricity Board is not a necessary or proper party to proceedings under section 38 - Board is duty ... Cutting #HL_....
1979 0 Supreme(MP) 618 • India - Madhya Pradesh
S.R.VYAS
... Held: According to the provisions of section 38 of the Act, there is a prohibition against the cutting off or withholding of essential supply or service enjoyed by the tenant in respect of the accommodation let to him. ... In my opinion, if a part of the accommodation let out to a tenant is pulled down or demolished, it cannot be said that the tenant has been deprived of either any essential supply or service enjoyed as a tenant....
2006 0 Supreme(MP) 214 • India - Madhya Pradesh
P.K.JAISWAL
Murlidhar [1973 JLJ SN 50] in which this Court has held that section 38 of the Act does not prescribe the remedy for cutting off or withholding a supply or service which is "non-essential". ... Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that section 38 prohibits the landlord from cutting off or withholding essential supply or service enjoyed by the tenant without just and suffic....
Filter by Legal Phrase
