AI Overview...
-
Justice Braund's Opinion and Pathak J. - Justice Braund, part of the Full Bench, expressed reluctance to agree with the majority, aligning with Pathak J.'s opinion out of respect; the majority judgment was delivered by Pathak J., indicating his significant influence in the case. Firm Dhanraj Dev Kishan VS Sriniwas son of late Shri Ramchandra - Rajasthan, Bhanwar Lal VS Sriniwas - Rajasthan
-
Ambica Prasad and Attornment - The Supreme Court, in Ambica Prasad, discussed attornment, emphasizing legal principles relevant to property and landlord-tenant relations, which are often referenced in judgments involving property disputes. Firm Dhanraj Dev Kishan VS Sriniwas son of late Shri Ramchandra - Rajasthan
-
Legal References and Judgments - Several cases mention Dhanraj and Dhanraj Devkishan, indicating ongoing legal proceedings or judgments related to these parties, with references to civil appeals and writ petitions across different states (Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Bihar). These cases involve issues like property, civil disputes, or administrative matters. Ashok Kumar Pathak And Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors - Chhattisgarh, AMBIKA SHARMA vs STATE PANCHAYATI RAJ DEP ORS - Rajasthan, MANISH PATHAK BHATT vs STATE PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPORS - Rajasthan, DHARMISHTHA PATHAK AND ANR vs STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENTORS - Rajasthan, DR.PRAMILA PATHAK and ORS vs THE STATE OF BIHAR andORS - Patna, Dnyaneshwar s/o Laxmanrao Wankhede VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, Mohit Kumr Dwivedi VS Ram Janak Maurya - Allahabad
-
Role of Pathak in Legal Judgments - Multiple references highlight the importance of Justice Pathak's judgments in various cases, underscoring his influence and the respect accorded to his legal reasoning, especially in property and civil matters. Firm Dhanraj Dev Kishan VS Sriniwas son of late Shri Ramchandra - Rajasthan, Mohit Kumr Dwivedi VS Ram Janak Maurya - Allahabad
-
Legal Principles and Precedents - The references to judgments such as Shiv Kumar Pathak (2018) 12 SCC 595 and Ambika Prasad Mishra suggest discussions on legal precedents, especially concerning qualifications, restrictions, and binding nature of judgments. These cases reinforce the importance of consistent legal reasoning and adherence to precedent. Mohit Kumr Dwivedi VS Ram Janak Maurya - Allahabad
Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively highlight the prominence of Justice Pathak in delivering influential judgments, particularly in civil and property law. His opinions, sometimes shared reluctantly by colleagues like Justice Braund, have shaped legal interpretations, especially regarding attornment and property disputes. The references to various cases across Indian courts demonstrate his impact on jurisprudence, emphasizing the importance of respecting judicial precedents and the nuanced understanding of legal principles such as attornment and civil rights.
Search Results for "Dhanaraj Pathak Ambika"
2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 153 • India - Rajasthan
DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Justice Braund, who was one of the Judges constituting the Full Bench, with great reluctance shared the opinion of the majority merely out of respect for the opinion of Pathak J. and it appears that, left to himself, he would have held otherwise. The majority judgment was delivered by Pathak J. ... Ambica Prasad (supra), while discussing the issue regarding attornment, Hon'ble the Supreme Court has held as under:- "13. ... Civil First Appeal No. 192/2010 titled as "Firm Dhanraj Dev Kishan & Anr. v. ... Civil First Appeal....
• India - Chhattisgarh
Ashok Kumar Pathak S/o Late Kailash Pathak Aged About 52 Years B-52, Vijayapuram Phase-I, Seepat Road, Thana - Sarkanda, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. ... Amrika Bai age 50 years, W/o Ramchand Dhurve Peon, (State Dairy Lab. ... Prakash Sharma, S/o Late Dhanraj Sharma, Aged About 35 Years Working As Peon, Posted At Directorate, Pashudhan And Dairy Department, Raipur, ... Prakash Sharma age 30 years, S/o Dhanraj Sharma Peon, Directorate, Animal Husbandry And Dairy Deptt, G.E.Road, Raipur Chhattisga....
• India - High Court of Rajasthan - High Court Bench at Jaipur
S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5386/2012 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5081/2012 SB Civil Writ Petition No.4411/2012 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4712/2012 Dhanraj
• India - Jharkhand
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Pathak, Resident of village Koura, P.O. ... Manju Pathak W/o Surendra Pathak resident of village Manpur P.O. Rohila P.S. Ramna Dist. ... Shiv Kumar Pathak S/o Late Ram Prasad Pathak resident of village Sandhya P.O. Dawankara P.S. ... Vikash Kumar Pathak Age- 45 years S/o Suresh Kumar Pathak R/o Budhibir, P.O.- Harinamarh, P.S.
• India - High Court of Rajasthan - High Court Bench at Jaipur
S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5386/2012 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5081/2012 SB Civil Writ Petition No.4411/2012 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4712/2012 Dhanraj
• India - High Court of Rajasthan - High Court Bench at Jaipur
S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5386/2012 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5081/2012 SB Civil Writ Petition No.4411/2012 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4712/2012 Dhanraj
• India - Patna
PRAMILA PATHAK D/O LATE DR. MURARI PATHAK & W/O DR. ... PRABHAKAR PATHAK S/O RAJENDRA PATHAK R/O VILL BANDWAR, P.S. ... SOBHA KANT PATHAK S/O LATE JUGESHWAR PATHAK R/O VILL.- JAGATPUR, P.S. ... SHAKAR PATHAK S/O LATE JAGARNATH PATHAK R/O BHAINSDIYARA, P.S.- BARARI, DISTT.- KATIHAR PATHAK WORKING AS PEON, WORKING IN MAHILLA p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre
2005 0 Supreme(Bom) 922 • India - Bombay
A.H.JOSHI
Sudhansu sekhar Misra, (3) Ambica Quarry Works vs. State of Gujarat. "needs to be borne in mind while applying Law laid down by two co-ordinate benches having same strength. ... According to complainant madhukar Dhote the accused again demanded a sum of Rs. 1500/- for releasing complainant madhukar and his servant on bail in another complaint filed by Dhanraj Mohod for causing injury due to assault to his cow out of which he had then paid on two occasions a sum of rs. 100 and ... LJ. 3635, Mahamoodkhan mahboobkhan Pathan Vs. State of maha....
2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 2892 • India - Rajasthan
DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Justice Braund, who was one of the Judges constituting the Full Bench, with great reluctance shared the opinion of the majority merely out of respect for the opinion of Pathak J. and it appears that, left to himself, he would have held otherwise. The majority judgment was delivered by Pathak J. ... Dhanraj Devkishan & Ors.) is set aside. ... Ambica Prasad (supra), while discussing the issue regarding attornment, Hon’ble the Supreme Court has held as under:- "13. ... Civil First Appeal No. 192/2010 titled as "Firm #HL_STA....
2023 0 Supreme(All) 1242 • India - Allahabad
ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI, OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Shiv Kumar Pathak [(2018) 12 SCC 595]. ... Shiv Kumar Pathak [(2018) 12 SCC 595]. (63) On the other hand, Sri J. N. ... Shiv Kumar Pathak [(2018) 12 SCC 595, which held that any person who hold such qualification could not be ousted on the ground of restrictions in the Rule or Circular. ... (70) In support of the submission that judgment will not lose binding precedent even if inadequately considered and/or fallaciously reasoned, he has relied on the judgment of Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in Ambika Prasad Mish....
Filter by Legal Phrase
