Back
ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI, OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Mohit Kumr Dwivedi – Appellant
Versus
Ram Janak Maurya – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PRELUDE
(1) Heard extensively at length Sri Anil Tewari, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Apoorva Tiwari, learned Counsel for the appellant in Special Appeal No. 613 of 2018, Dr. L. P. Mishra assisted by Sri Onkar Singh and Sri Man Bahadur Singh, learned Counsel for the appellants in Special Appeals Nos.609 of 2018 and 617 of 2018, Sri Himanshu Raghave, learned counsel for the appellants in Special Appeal No. 634 of 2018, 670 of 2018, 193 of 2020 as also in Special Appeal Defective Nos. 276 of 2021, 13 of 2022, 267 of 2022 387 of 2023 and 413 of 2023, Sri Vinay Prakash Tiwari, learned Counsel for the appellants in Special appeal No. 92 of 2020, Sri Dilip Mishra, learned counsel for the appellants in Special Appeal Defective No. 207 of 2020, Ms. Shreya Chaudhary, learned counsel for the appellants in Special Appeal Defective No. 65 of 2023, Sri Priyam Mishra, learned counsel for the appellants in Special Appeal Defective No. 68 of 2023, Sri Upendra Nath Mishra, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Neel Kamal Mishra, learned counsel for the appellants in Specia
The circular issued by the Board of Basic Education allowing candidates from zero vacancy districts to participate in the selection process for the post of Assistant Teachers was valid as it was in c....
Point of Law : Executive action to escape wrath of Art. 14 has to be fair, reasonable, non-discriminatory, transparent, non-capricious, unbiased, without favouritism, in pursuit of appointment and eq....
It is well-established that an authority cannot make any selection/appointment beyond the number of posts advertised, even if there were a larger number of posts available than those advertised.
The Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) is a mandatory qualification for all candidates seeking appointment as teachers in elementary education, effective from the notification date of 23.08.2010, and can....
Candidates on a merit list do not have an indefeasible right to appointment if they fail to meet the prescribed cut-off marks, emphasizing the need for fair recruitment processes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that candidates who have secured more marks than the last selected candidates are entitled to be considered for counseling and appointment, especia....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
