AI Overview...
-
Doubt on Jeopardy - Interest in Jeopardy - The phrase interest in jeopardy indicates that a party's rights or interests are at risk, emphasizing the importance of procedural safeguards. For example, in No. 1746 of 1987, the court notes that the interest is in jeopardy and that the locus (standing) can be doubted without proper reason People S Forum For Social Cause And Civil Liberty, Brajnath Thakur, Bihar State M. B. As. Association VS State Of Bihar - Patna, Bihar State M. B. As Association VS State Of Bihar - Patna.
-
Jeopardy in Legal Proceedings - The concept of jeopardy applies to various legal contexts, such as the effectiveness of notices or the validity of proceedings. For instance, posting sale notices only when personal service isn't possible underscores the protection of a person's valuable rights from being jeopardized unfairly On The Death of Ushangini Devi, Her Legal Representatives Sree Ram Sankar Mukhopadhya and Others. VS Sadananda Das & Ors. - Gauhati.
-
Double Jeopardy Doctrine - Multiple sources emphasize that once a person has been acquitted or convicted, they cannot be tried again for the same offence, highlighting the principle of double jeopardy. Courts have held that subsequent proceedings or bans cannot amount to double jeopardy unless they involve the same offence and legal identity. For example, in criminal cases involving acquittals or bans, the doctrine prevents re-prosecution or multiple punishments ANILMA ASSOCIATES VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi, Bijon Kumar Paul VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta, Bijon Kumar Paul VS State of West Bengal - Crimes, Anbu VS State by the Inspector of Police, Valathi Police Station - Madras.
-
Application in Different Contexts - Double jeopardy also extends to administrative or departmental actions, such as bans or removal from supplier lists, where multiple sanctions related to the same misconduct may violate this principle ANILMA ASSOCIATES VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi.
-
Limitations and Judicial Approach - Courts have consistently rejected pleas based on double jeopardy when proceedings involve distinct offences or legal violations under different statutes, affirming that the doctrine applies strictly to the same offence and facts Jitendra Singh VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Legal Rights and Jeopardy - The right to legal defense and protections under constitutional provisions, such as Articles 21 and 22, are designed to prevent undue jeopardy to individuals' rights, ensuring fair trial procedures and safeguarding against repeated prosecution State Of M. P. : Advocate General For The State Of Madras: Advocate General For The State Of Kerala: Advocate General For The State Of Gujarat VS Shobharam - Supreme Court.
Analysis and Conclusion
The concept of jeopardy in legal contexts primarily safeguards individuals' interests from unfair or repeated legal actions, whether in criminal trials, administrative proceedings, or civil disputes. The doctrine of double jeopardy is strictly applied to prevent multiple prosecutions or punishments for the same offence, reinforcing the finality of legal decisions. Courts consistently uphold these principles, emphasizing procedural fairness and protecting constitutional rights, although the scope may vary depending on the context and jurisdiction.
References: - People S Forum For Social Cause And Civil Liberty, Brajnath Thakur, Bihar State M. B. As. Association VS State Of Bihar - Patna, Bihar State M. B. As Association VS State Of Bihar - Patna, MITHAN LAL VS THANA - Allahabad, On The Death of Ushangini Devi, Her Legal Representatives Sree Ram Sankar Mukhopadhya and Others. VS Sadananda Das & Ors. - Gauhati, ANILMA ASSOCIATES VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi, State Of M. P. : Advocate General For The State Of Madras: Advocate General For The State Of Kerala: Advocate General For The State Of Gujarat VS Shobharam - Supreme Court, Bijon Kumar Paul VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta, Jitendra Singh VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana, Bijon Kumar Paul VS State of West Bengal - Crimes, Anbu VS State by the Inspector of Police, Valathi Police Station - Madras
Search Results for "Doubted Jeopardy"
1988 0 Supreme(Pat) 157 • India - Patna
P.S.MISHRA, L.P.N.SHAHDEO
No. 1746 of 1987 is placed better in the sense that it is his interest which is in jeopardy, his locus for no reason, can be doubted. The other contention touching the question of maintainability is derived from the language of Sec.39 of the Act.
1988 0 Supreme(Pat) 158 • India - Patna
P.S.MISHRA, L.P.N.SHAHDEO
No.1746 of 1987 is placed better in the sense that It is his interest which is in Jeopardy, his locus for no reason, can be doubted. The other contention touching the question of maintainability is derived from the language of Sec.39 of the Act.
1963 0 Supreme(All) 69 • India - Allahabad
R.S.PATHAK
The filing of the appeal or revision may put the decree or ord3r in jeopardy but until it is reversed or modified it remains effective. " the correctness of these principles has not yet been doubted. Reference was made to the decision of the same court in Madan Gopal v.
1982 0 Supreme(Gau) 39 • India - Gauhati
B.L.HANSARIA
Now, from the language of the rule it cannot be doubted that a sale notice can be posted on a conspicuous part of an estate only where personal service is not possible. The law has rightly insisted on personal notice because after all a valuable right of the concerned person is in jeopardy.
2003 0 Supreme(Del) 617 • India - Delhi
A.K.SIKRI
Excise - Removal from list of approved suppliers to departments, Ministries or offices of Government of India — Double jeopardy — ... commercial or business dealings with all departments/Ministries/Offices alleging mal practices of serious nature amounts to double jeopardy ... order passed by the respondents was not permissible after an order of banning of first kind and, thereforee, amounted to double jeopardy ... ... PLEA of double jeopardy was raised with all vehemence. ... It cannot be doubted that....
1966 0 Supreme(SC) 140 • India - Supreme Court
A. K. SARKAR, J. M. SHELAT, M. HIDAYATULLAH, R. S. BACHAWAT, J. R. MUDHOLKAR
reference to Art, 21 and for saying that the right to be defended by counsel is limited to a trial in which the arrested person is in jeopardy ... Why should this right be denied to him in a trial in which he is in jeopardy of being convicted and sentenced to a heavy fine? The clear words of Art. 22 furnish no basis for this limitation. On this branch of his argument, Mr. ... In support of his contention that the right of defence of the arrested person given by Cl. (1) of Art. 22 should be restricted to trial of offences in which the accused is in #HL_STAR....
2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 189 • India - Calcutta
AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
The petitioner sought discharge from the latter proceeding, citing double jeopardy due to the earlier acquittal. ... Double Jeopardy - Criminal Proceedings - [Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 406/420/506] - The court discussed ... the doctrine of double jeopardy and its applicability in the case, highlighting the conflicting judgments on the issue and the need ... It is also not open to a High Court to refuse to follow a judgment by stating that it has been doubted by a later Coordinate Bench. ... The sole issue raised....
2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 1583 • India - Punjab and Haryana
ANOOP CHITKARA
... ... Issues: Whether concurrent proceedings under NIA and IPC violate the principle of double jeopardy. ... 420 - Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141 - Quashing of FIR - Petitioners sought to quash FIR alleging double jeopardy ... ... ... Findings of Court: ... Court found no merit in the plea of double jeopardy, affirming that distinct offences under IPC and ... It is also not open to a High Court to refuse to follow a judgment by stating that it has been doubted by a later Coordinate Bench. .....
• India - Crimes
AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
406/420/506 – Criminal breach of trust, cheating and criminal intimidation – Rejection of prayer for discharge – Plea of Double Jeopardy ... It is also not open to a High Court to refuse to follow a judgment by stating that it has been doubted by a later Coordinate Bench. ... The sole issue raised in this appeal is regarding the scope and application of doctrine of double jeopardy. The rule against double jeopardy provides foundation for the pleas of autrefois acquit and autrefois convict. ... We have also come across ex....
2016 0 Supreme(Mad) 831 • India - Madras
M.JAICHANDREN, S.NAGAMUTHU
Double Jeopardy - Dacoity - Indian Penal Code - 120-B, 452, 395, 396, 397, 402 Fact of the Case: The case involves ... Issues: The main issue was the appellant's involvement in the dacoity and murder, as well as the application of double jeopardy ... Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code but set aside the conviction and sentence for the offence under Section 395 due to double jeopardy ... His presence at the place of occurrence cannot be doubted. He has stated that four persons were inside the house and the accused 3 an....
Filter by Legal Phrase
