AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion
The NDPS Act (1985) is recognized as a stringent, draconian legislation designed to combat drug trafficking and related crimes. Courts consistently emphasize that offenses under this law are to be classified under 'law and order,' not 'public order,' thus excluding the grounds for preventive detention in most cases. Strict procedural compliance is vital to uphold convictions, reflecting the law's severe nature. While effective in addressing drug crimes, the law's harsh provisions raise concerns about potential misuse and individual rights violations. Overall, the NDPS Act's enforcement must balance stringent measures with constitutional safeguards to prevent abuse.

Search Results for "Draconiam Law Related to Ndps"

C.  Abhayananda VS State of Telangana

2022 0 Supreme(Telangana) 147 India - Telangana

SHAMEEM AKTHER, CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

The court also emphasized the distinction between 'law and order' and 'public order' as per Supreme Court precedents. ... Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Supreme Court precedents to distinguish between 'law and order' and 'public order', emphasizing ... Habeas Corpus - Preventive Detention - Telangana Preventive Detention Act, 1986 - Section 3(2) - NDPS Act, 1985 - Section 20 ( ... Since the detenu has allegedly committed offence punishable under the NDPS Act, the said crime can be effectively dealt with under the ....

Joga Ram VS State of West Bengal

2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 1179 India - Calcutta

ARIJIT BANERJEE, PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Act and Rule 3 of the NDPS Rules, 2022, regarding the preparation of an inventory of seized drugs. ... CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - BAIL - NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985 - SECTION 37 - SECTION 41B - SECTION 52A - SEIZURE ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner, accused of possessing commercial quantities of contraband under the Narcotic Drugs ... 15 of 2022 unless such condition has been relaxed by the learned trial court. ... Draconian provision which may lead to a harsh sentence having re....

Dayaram Chouhan S/o Shri Sahbali Chouhan VS Union of India

2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 71 India - Rajasthan

FARJAND ALI

Finding of Court : Court is cognizant of provisions contained in Section 32-A and Section 37 of NDPS ... Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. ... The NDPS Act is called a draconian law because of its stringent provision of punishment and that is why the mandatory provisions are required to be complied with stricto sensu, failure of which vitiates the recovery. 10. ... It is trite....

Pavan Gopalbhai Chamadiya Through His Wife Nikita Pavan Chamadiya VS State Of Gujarat

2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 664 India - Gujarat

A. S. SUPEHIA, DIVYESH A. JOSHI

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the detention order must be based on valid grounds related to public order, and ... Section 37 the NDPS Act, 1985 reads thus: “Section 37. Offences to be cognizable and nonbailable. ... The powers of preventive detention are exceptional and even draconian. Tracing their origin to the colonial era, they have been continued with strict constitutional safeguards against abuse. ... The reason for laying much stress on this aspect of the matter is the fact that the appellant though arrested in conne....

Vankudoth Jani VS State of Telangana rep.  by Principal Secretary, Home Department

2021 0 Supreme(Telangana) 34 India - Telangana

A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, SHAMEEM AKTHER

- Thus, this case does not fall within ambit of words "public Order" - Instead, it falls within the scope of the words "law and ... under 18 years of age, no inference of disturbance of public order can be drawn - These cases can certainly be tried under special law ... They are confined within the ambit and scope of the word "law and order". Since the offence alleged is under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, 'NDPS Act'), the detenu can certainly be tried and convicte....

Biraj Chandra Mazumdar VS State of Assam

India - Crimes

B.P.SARAF

Taking advantage of the rigors of the "draconian" law relating to NDPS the etlemies of an innocent man or unscrupulous officers can foist a false case with a view to harass him. ... The drug-related insanity leads either to crimes of violence or to wilful self-killing under irrestible impulse. Thousands of drug-addicts are becoming physically invalid owing to the adulterated narcotics. ... It is related to drug addiction which is produced by repeated consumption of a drug and is characterised by “(1) an....

Shrawan Kumar VS State of Rajasthan

2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 2041 India - Rajasthan

FARJAND ALI

(A) NDPS Act - Sections 8/21, 8/22, 32-A, 37, and 42 - Conviction under NDPS Act for possession of contraband, involving non-compliance ... with mandatory procedural provisions. - The prosecution failed to establish compliance with Section 42 of the NDPS Act. ... ... ... Findings of Court: ... The court emphasized strict adherence to the NDPS Act's provisions and accepted that non-compliance ... Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order....

Konety Hemanth Kumar VS State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary

India - Crimes

RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, A.ABHISHEK REDDY

They are confined within the ambit and scope of the word ‘law and order’. Since the offences alleged are under Narcotic, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, the detenu can certainly be tried and convicted under the said Act. ... 16) Grave as the offence may be, it relates to peddling of drugs. So, no inference of disturbance of public order can be drawn. These types of cases can certainly be tried under the normal criminal justice system. And, if convicted, can certainly be punished by the Court of law. ... Ther....

Krishnan VS State of Haryana

2013 4 Supreme 49 India - Supreme Court

B.S.CHAUHAN, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA

anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ,or any other law for the time being in force. ... Petition raises the following substantial questions of law: ... I. ? ... Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985-Section 32-A - Abrogation of rights ... A two Judge Bench of this Court heard the matter on 8.1.1993 and prima facie had been of the view that on a plain reading of Section 32- A of NDPS Act, it appeared to be quite draconian and to understand the matter further, the Cou....

MOHD.  IRFAN VS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2018 0 Supreme(Del) 1824 India - Delhi

VIPIN SANGHI, I.S.MEHTA

See 35 P.S. § 780–113 (subsection (a) enumerates thirty-nine prohibited acts related to various narcotics; subsections (b) through (o) grade each of thirty-nine offenses and directs court to impose fines “not exceeding” certain amounts). ... Counsel submits that the MCOCA is a codified law on socio-economic offences, much like the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) and Section 21 of NDPS Act prescribed graded approach to fines, as per the gravity of the offence. ... Singh J,....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top