AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The Employees Compensation Act provides a framework for awarding compensation in cases involving limb injuries and prostheses, factoring in disability percentage, prosthesis costs, and the need for replacements. Courts assess the severity, earning capacity loss, and prosthesis lifespan to determine fair compensation, sometimes modifying awards on appeal. Liability may extend to hospitals and employers if negligence is involved. Overall, the main focus is on ensuring that compensation reflects the injury's impact on the claimant's earning capacity and quality of life, including prosthetic needs.

Search Results for "Employees Compensation Act Prosthesis"

Hema Subhash Daughter Of Subhash Narayanan Vs B M T C Managing Director

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 10592 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

K.S.MUDAGAL, C.M. POONACHA, JJ

(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166 and 168 - Claim for compensation due to injuries sustained in a bus accident - Claimant ... ... ... (B) Compensation - The principle of just compensation requires that the awarded amount reflects the severity of injuries ... ... ... Result: The appeal is allowed in part, with enhanced compensation of Rs.10,10,000/- awarded. ... , 2006 could be deducted from the compensation computed under MV Act. ... The claimants/depen....

A.K. VIJAYAN vs THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19876 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , claiming compensation for the injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 16.08.2012. ... Since the petitioner was aged 51 on the date of the accident, and the average life of a prosthesis is 5 years, I hold that towards the cost of prosthesis, the petitioner is entitled to get the price of three prostheses and accessories. ... The petitioner has produced a tax invoice showing the cost of prosthesis at Rs.1,20,248/- and two receipt voucher....

Ved Yadav VS State of NCT of Delhi

2023 0 Supreme(Del) 2458 India - Delhi

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

He sought compensation and functional prosthesis, as neither the Delhi Prisons Act, 2000 nor Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 addressed the ... After approaching the Court, the petitioner's application for compensation and prosthesis was not decided by the jail authorities ... Compensation - Convict Inmate of Tihar Jail - Delhi Prisons Act, 2000, Rule No. 1084 of Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 Fact of ... Since the present petitioner has already been provided interim comp....

Sameer, S/o. Late Kareem vs V.M. Mymoon

2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 1619 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MR. JUSTICE C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J

(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166 and 168 - Claim for compensation due to injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident ... (Paras 33, 38) (E) Interest on Compensation - The enhanced compensation will carry interest at ... ... ... Result: Appeal allowed in part; total compensation modified to Rs.53,76,069/-. ... Even as per the First Schedule to the Employees Compensation Act, amputation below hip with stump exceeding 12.70 cms in lengt....

Petitioner in O.P.(M.V.) No. 299/2015 vs 2nd respondent (insurer of the offending vehicle)

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 19760 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Employees Compensation Act , the percentage of loss of earning capacity in case of amputation below the knee is 50%, I am inclined to accept the percentage of permanent disability of the petitioner at 50%. Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , claiming compensation for the injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 30.01.2015. ... Rs.20,00,000/- towards the cost of four prosthesis, and another Rs. 6,00,000/- was awarded towards cost of maintenance of the prosthesis#....

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED  vs SAJITH

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12516 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J

(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166 - Claim for compensation due to injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident - The petitioner ... The Tribunal initially awarded Rs.18,42,700/- as compensation. ... total compensation to Rs.46,57,680/- with interest at 8% per annum. ... The learned counsel has also relied upon Section 2(1)(l) of the Employees Compensation Act, which defines the term “Total disablement” as follows: (l) "total disablement" means such disablem....

NEERUPAM MOHAN MATHUR VS NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.

2013 4 Supreme 665 India - Supreme Court

G.S.SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

as a Product Design Engineer in a certain company in Haryana- The employer had engaged a Chartered bus for carrying its employees ... He filed claim petition claiming Rs. 12 lacs as compensation. ... found a loss of earning capacity to 70% in view of the permanent disability of the right hand of the claimant and enhanced the compensation ... The learned counsel states that if the prosthesis were to be fixed, the disability would even be less. In my view, it will make a minimal difference for a prosthesis#HL_END....

Mahaveer Hospital and Research Centre VS Alladi Suvarnamma

2005 0 Supreme(AP) 608 India - Andhra Pradesh

P.S.NARAYANA

. – Quantum of compensation fixed by the trial Court, in the considered opinion of this Court, is not just and reasonable and hence ... findings no doubt are hereby confirmed to the extent referred to supra but the quantum of compensation is fixed at Rs.75,000/- taking ... This witness was cross-examined and this witness in cross-examination deposed that the prosthesis which had been given to him was correct and the prosthesis which he wanted was not supplied and the Prosthesis supplied by D-1 hospital ....

UTTARANCHAL TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS NAVNEET JERATH

2012 0 Supreme(Del) 3260 India - Delhi

G.P.MITTAL

The Court found that the compensation awarded was exorbitant and excessive. ... NEGLIGENCE - Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (the M.V. ... The Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs. 11,71,000/- in favor of the First Respondent. ... It is submitted that one prosthesis may last from 7-8 years and therefore, the First Respondent would need five prosthesis considering his life expectancy to be 75 years. ... 29. ... The First Respondent filed cross objections on th....

P. D.  Hinduja National Hospital & Medical Research Centre VS Veera Rohinton Kotwal

India - Consumer

D.K.JAIN, M.SHREESHA

, full-time or part-time. - The hospital is liable for the negligent acts of its employees, even if the employees are not in its ... The State Commission partly allowed the complaint and awarded compensation. The hospital and Dr. ... The State Commission partly allowed the complaint and awarded compensation. The hospital and Dr. ... cause for early loosening of tibial prosthesis. ... Divan was an employee of respondent No.1 and the State must be held to be variously liable for the negl....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top