AI Overview...
Ex Parte Order against One of the Plaintiffs
Main Points and Insights
- Unjustified Ex Parte Orders: Courts often pass ex parte orders, such as injunctions or decrees, without proper notice or when the defendant has already appeared and responded (e.g., BALDEV SINGH VS KARTAR SINGH - Himachal Pradesh, Gurmej Singh VS Ranjit Kaur - Allahabad, Sheonath VS Damodar - Rajasthan, Govindbhai Dayal Mange VS Vijaykumar Balkishan Agarwal - Bombay).
- Legal Requirements for Ex Parte Orders: Ex parte injunctions or decrees require strict adherence to procedural rules, including the presence or proper notice to all parties involved. Orders passed without following due process are liable to be set aside (Zila Parishad, Budaun VS Brahma Rishi Sharma - Allahabad, Ramon Services Private LTD. VS Subhash Kapoor - Supreme Court, Amanulla Manjhi VS Ayfarjan Bibi - Calcutta).
- Setting Aside Ex Parte Orders: Courts frequently set aside ex parte decrees or orders if they are found to be unjustified, such as in cases where the defendant was not properly served, or where the order was passed in the absence of the defendant’s appearance (Sheonath VS Damodar - Rajasthan, Ramon Services Private LTD. VS Subhash Kapoor - Supreme Court, Amanulla Manjhi VS Ayfarjan Bibi - Calcutta, KHATIZABAI VS AKHTARA BEGAM - Nagpur).
- Cost and Consequences: When ex parte orders are set aside, courts often impose costs on the party seeking or obtaining such orders, emphasizing the importance of following proper legal procedures (Ramon Services Private LTD. VS Subhash Kapoor - Supreme Court, BALDEV SINGH VS KARTAR SINGH - Himachal Pradesh).
- Exceptions and Circumstances: In some cases, ex parte orders are justified due to circumstances like death of a party or non-appearance despite due notice, but such orders are subject to review and can be challenged and set aside if procedural lapses are identified (Sheonath VS Damodar - Rajasthan, KHATIZABAI VS AKHTARA BEGAM - Nagpur).
Analysis and Conclusion
Ex parte orders against a plaintiff or defendant are generally scrutinized closely by courts. They are often set aside if procedural requirements are not met, such as lack of notice, appearance, or proper service, ensuring fairness in judicial proceedings. Courts emphasize adherence to the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), particularly Orders 9, 30, 39, and 43, which govern ex parte actions. When orders are unjustified or passed improperly, they can be challenged and revoked, often with costs imposed on the party seeking ex parte relief. Proper legal procedure and timely intervention are crucial to prevent wrongful ex parte decrees.
References:
- BALDEV SINGH VS KARTAR SINGH - Himachal Pradesh, Shareefuddin VS Syed Anwar Mohiuddin - Andhra Pradesh, Gurmej Singh VS Ranjit Kaur - Allahabad, Zila Parishad, Budaun VS Brahma Rishi Sharma - Allahabad, Sheonath VS Damodar - Rajasthan, Ramon Services Private LTD. VS Subhash Kapoor - Supreme Court, KHATIZABAI VS AKHTARA BEGAM - Nagpur, UNION BANK OF INDIA VS INDIAN PROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED - Delhi, Amanulla Manjhi VS Ayfarjan Bibi - Calcutta, Govindbhai Dayal Mange VS Vijaykumar Balkishan Agarwal - Bombay
Search Results for "Ex Parte Order against One of the Plaintiff"
1997 0 Supreme(HP) 214 • India - Himachal Pradesh
P.K.PALLI
- Passing one order after the other for providing police help to plaintiff was wholly uncalled for in the given situation - Impugned ... towards filing of applications by plaintiff making requests for police help - Orders have been passed ex parte at the back of defendant ... INJUNCTION - When defendant had put in appearance and filed reply to the application under Order 30 Rules 1 and 2 - Court should ... The defendant had already put in appearance and these orders have been passed ex....
2003 0 Supreme(AP) 179 • India - Andhra Pradesh
P.S.NARAYANA
ex parte order ... CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, Sec148-A - Caveat lodged by one defendant against other defendant - Plaintiff not a party to Caveat - ... Court passing ex parte order of status quo inspite of Caveat relating to self-same subject matter - Caveat in between defendants ... and the plaintiff was not a party to the caveat and the caveat was not lodged as against the plaintiff. ... The caveat in between the defendants inter se cannot be s....
2020 0 Supreme(All) 737 • India - Allahabad
VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA
and the plaintiff was directed to comply with the provision of Order 39 Rule 3 CPC and 28.8.2020 was fixed for hearing for temporary ... Defendant no. 1 is the purchaser of the property from one of the co-sharers – The order of ex-parte temporary injunction was granted ... – By the order the trial court has granted an ex-parte interim injunction by recording reasons. ... The order of ex-parte temporary injunction was granted and the....
1969 0 Supreme(All) 103 • India - Allahabad
S.N.SINGH, A.K.KIRTY, S.N.DWIVEDI
In one case, the plaintiff sought an injunction to restrain the defendants from enforcing an order of suspension and interfering ... In the third case, the plaintiff sought an injunction to restrain the defendants from wasting, damaging, or alienating property in ... APPEALABILITY OF EX PARTE AD INTERIM INJUNCTION - ORDER 39, RULES 1 AND 2, ORDER 43, RULE 1(R), C.P.C. - An ex parte ad interim ... In this suit the plaintiff moved an ....
2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 2766 • India - Rajasthan
AJAY RASTOGI
been passed ex parte because of the death of one of the plaintiff and defendants and their legal representative were not allow to ... Civil Procedure Code, Order 9, Rule 13 – Decree has ... It was found that the ex parte revenue decree was not proper so liable to set aside and direction issued to allow on record the legal ... to bring L/rs of plaintiff (Rameshwar) & defendant (Kana) on record who died pendent revenue suit and the Revenue Court may hear the suit afresh along with applic....
2000 7 Supreme 569 • India - Supreme Court
K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI
Appellant shall pay a sum of Rs. 5000/- as costs to the respondent/plaintiff within one month from today and on such payment (or ... order deserved to be set aside on payment of cost of Rs. 5,000/- to plaintiff-Advocate answerable for consequence suffered by party ... deposit with the trial Court) the ex-parte order dated 26.8.1998 would stand set aside. ... Appellant shall pay a sum of Rs. 5000/- as costs to the respondent/plaintiff within one month....
1950 0 Supreme(Nagpur) 8 • India - Nagpur
MUDHOLKAR
The plaintiff applied for restoration of the suit, which was allowed by the lower court. ... The court held that there was sufficient cause for restoration of the suit as the plaintiff was not lacking in diligence. ... of a contract for the sale of a house was dismissed in default on the ground that the plaintiff's counsel did not appear and the plaintiff ... I grant that where the original order is one dismissing a suit in default of appearance of a Plaintiff or is one#HL_EN....
2000 0 Supreme(Del) 489 • India - Delhi
MUKUL MUDGAL
An ex-parte decree was initially passed in favor of the plaintiff, which was later set aside for one of the defendants. ... An ex-parte decree was initially passed in favor of the plaintiff, which was later set aside for one of the defendants. ... Order XXXVII CPC - Recovery of Debt - The plaintiff-Bank sought recovery of a debt arising from a claim for providing Packing ... ... ( 1 ) THIS is a suit on behalf of the plaintiff-Bank ....
1920 0 Supreme(Cal) 470 • India - Calcutta
BEACHCROFT
The Munsif set aside the decree, and the plaintiff challenged this order. ... Tenancy - Bengal Tenancy Act - Section 153A - Setting Aside Ex Parte Decree Fact of the Case: The plaintiff filed ... The holding was sold in 1918, and in 1920, one of the defendants applied to set aside the ex parte decree. ... . - This Rule was issued at the instance of the plaintiff in a rent suit, the suit was brought against 11 persons and a decree was obtained ex parte#HL_EN....
2007 0 Supreme(Bom) 849 • India - Bombay
R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, D.G.KARNIK
. one lakh - Plaintiff received overall Rs. 1,65,000/- as against his claim of Rs. 1 lakh as compensation in criminal complaint under ... Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order XXXVII, Rule 4 - Setting aside ex parte decree. - In order to get ex parte decree to be set aside ... Act - Notice of motion liable to be allowed - Ex parte order of dismissal set aside - Appeal allowed - Suit restored - Conditional ... In order to get ex #HL_STA....
Filter by Legal Phrase
