FIR Writer and Investigation Officer - Same or Different?
The sources indicate that the FIR writer and the Investigation Officer are generally different roles in criminal proceedings. The FIR writer is the individual who records the initial complaint or information (e.g., PW 4 Shri Kuwar Pal Singh in source Jai Shanker @ Ashok VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, PW 4 Shri Kuwar Pal Singh in Jai Shanker @ Ashok VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, and the writer of FIR is mentioned as a witness or informant). The Investigation Officer is a police officer who takes over the case after the FIR is lodged, conducts inquiries, examines witnesses, and files charges (e.g., PW 5 Constable Keshav in State of Uttarakhand VS Mohan Singh - Uttarakhand, PW 8 Sri Dhaniram Bharali in Md. Abu Zafar VS State of Assam - Gauhati, and PW 5 Shri Arun Kumar Dubey in Jai Shanker @ Ashok VS State of U. P. - Allahabad).
Role of the FIR Writer
The FIR writer is typically a police constable or officer responsible for recording the initial complaint or information. The FIR itself is a document created based on the informant’s statement and is not the same as the Investigation Officer’s role, who handles subsequent investigation procedures.
Role of the Investigation Officer
The Investigation Officer (IO) is appointed after the FIR is registered and is responsible for investigating the case, examining witnesses, collecting evidence, and submitting reports or chargesheets (e.g., PW 6 B.R. Arya in State of Uttarakhand VS Mohan Singh - Uttarakhand, PW 8 Sri Dhaniram Bharali in Md. Abu Zafar VS State of Assam - Gauhati, PW 5 Shri Arun Kumar Dubey in Jai Shanker @ Ashok VS State of U. P. - Allahabad).
Legal and Procedural Clarifications
Several sources discuss procedural irregularities and distinctions between the FIR writer and IO. For example, in Amit Sharma VS State of Uttar Pradesh - Allahabad, doubts are raised about the timing of the FIR and witness testimonies, emphasizing that the FIR is a record of initial complaint, while investigation is a separate procedural step. In Ravindra Prasad Verma VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh, the absence of a formal FIR record is noted, illustrating procedural differences.
Conclusion
Based on the references, the FIR writer and the Investigation Officer are not the same person. The FIR writer records the initial complaint, while the Investigation Officer conducts the investigation after the FIR is registered. The roles are distinct and serve different functions within criminal procedural law.
On the basis of said first information report, which was registered as case crime no. 1296 of 2004, the investigation began. PW 6 B.R. Arya (Circle Officer) took the statements of the writer of first information report and the informant PW 3 Umed Singh. ... PW 5 Constable Keshav proved chik FIR (Ext. Ka-7) and entry of the same in G.D. (Ext. Ka-8). When accused was arrested, the same was entered in G.D. (Ext. Ka-9). PW 6 B.R. Arya, Circle Officer, took upon himself th....
In his examination-in-chief, he deposed that on 17.01.2001 while he was at Mancachar Police Station, the Officer-in-charge endorsed the FIR to him for investigation. After examining the informant and the writer of the FIR, he went to the place of occurrence. ... PW-8 Sri Dhaniram Bharali is the Investigation Officer who took over from the previous incumbent i.e. PW-9. He is the one who submitted the charge sheet upon completion of the investigation. ....
The prosecution presented evidence including the testimony of the sole eyewitness, the postmortem report, and the FIR. ... Adeel Ahmad who conducted the postmortem upon the dead body, P.W-3 Shri Mirza Sikander Beigh the complainant, P.W-4 Shri Kuwar Pal Singh writer of the check F.I.R and P.W-5 S.I Shri Arun Kumar Dubey Investigation Officer. ... 10. ... The carbon copy of which is Exhibit Ka-6 P.W-5 Shri Arun Kumar Dubey started investigation and recorded the statement of complainant ....
On 3-11-97 he recorded the statements of Laxmi Tiwari and Sita Ram Tiwari on 9-11-97 he recorded the statement of writer of First Information Report Ram Bahadur Singh and witness Salim. On 17-11-97 the investigation officer was transferred and further investigation was conducted by P. ... He has stated that from 22-11-97 to 29-1-98 he was Station House Officer of Police Station Misraulia. He had started investigation of the case from 22-11-97 on 24-11-97 he had receiv....
Nothing contrary could be gathered from the statement of the informant about lodging of the first information report, the Check writer who had entered in the witness box as PW-11 and the first Investigating Officer who had conducted investigation on 24.10.2005 and 25.10.2005. ... PW-12 is the first Investigation Officer who deposed that he was posted in the police station Jahangirabad on 24.10.2005 and received investigation of Case Crime No. 292/05 under Section 394 ....
report, and the conduct of the witnesses and the investigating officers. ... The first information report was found to be ante-timed, and there were contradictions and doubts in the eyewitness testimonies. ... The inquest proceedings were not conducted promptly, and the conduct of the witnesses and the lodging of the FIR raised suspicions ... It has come on record in the statement of PW-3 Inspector Vikas narain adav that he has not recorded the statement of FIR writer during investigation#HL_E....
It concluded that the delay in lodging the FIR was properly explained, and the conduct of witnesses was not unnatural. ... The judgment discusses the delay in lodging the FIR, motive, presence of witnesses, and medical evidence, ultimately concluding that ... The prosecution alleged that the accused fired upon the deceased at a tube-well, and the delay in lodging the FIR was explained by ... P.W.3, Sub-Inspector Ram Vilas Verma, First Investigating Officer (hereinafter referred to as 'F.I.O.') took investigatio....
(2) Criminal P.C., 1973 -- Ss. 157 and 154 -- no suggestion of recording of FIR ... No such suggestion has been made by the defence to the Investigating Officer. The record contains the document indicating that the carbon counterfoil of the report was received in the Court of J.M.F.C. on 6.09.1992. I have, therefore, no hesitation in holding that FIR Ex. ... Nothing prevented the accused from seeking recall of the said witness for this purpose and in any case the question could have been suggested to the Investigating Officer#HL....
The accused challenged the legality of the investigation and the credibility of the prosecution witnesses. ... The court highlighted procedural irregularities and the lack of credibility in the investigation and witness testimony. ... Issues: The issues involved the legality of the investigation, the credibility of police witnesses, and the burden of proof ... So called FIR lodged in Police Station, Karera is the report by Returning Officer who conducted the entire investigation proce....
The Investigating Officer started investigation and copied tahrirand chik FIR and recorded statements of the writer, informant and other witnesses and went in search of the accused. ... (XXIV) He had provided this CD to the Investigating Officer during the investigation. His father had submitted this CD but he cannot say what was the result of that. ... It is established law in criminal justice that prosecution has to prove its case on its own evidence and not on the weakness of the #....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.