AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Forensic testing plays a pivotal role in cheque bounce cases by providing scientific validation of signatures and ink age, which are critical in establishing authenticity or forgery. Courts frequently rely on expert opinions under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act to resolve disputes related to cheque signatures. Proper forensic investigation can lead to significant judicial outcomes, including acquittals or convictions, but the admissibility and credibility of such evidence are carefully examined. Overall, forensic science enhances the evidentiary framework in cheque bounce litigations, making it an indispensable tool for effective resolution.

Search Results for "Forensic Test in a Cheque Bounce Cases"

Manish Singh VS Jeetendra Meena

2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 1594 India - Rajasthan

KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA

and said cheque on presentation bounced petitioner accused in statement recorded took definite stand that he taken loan of only ... and said cheque on presentation bounced petitioner accused in statement recorded took definite stand that he taken loan of only ... of liability, even in case where cheque filled by some other person, petitioner qua sending cheque for determination of age cannot ... It was further alleged that in lieu thereof, petitioner had issued a cheque#HL_EN....

T.  Rajalingam @ Sambam VS State of Telangana

2017 0 Supreme(AP) 6 India - Andhra Pradesh

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Section 138—Evidence Act, 1872—Section 45—Dishonour of cheque—Expert opinion—Determination of age ... Nagappa (supra) in a cheque bounce case on the application of the accused to send the disputed signature on the cheque to determine the age of his signature observed that when it is the contention of the accused that complainant has misused the cheque obtained and even in case where presumption under ... Selvaraj, 2012 (5) CTC 596, where in a cheque #HL....

Velagapudi Kishore Kumar VS Boppana Venkata Naga Krishna

2025 0 Supreme(AP) 513 India - Andhra Pradesh

RAVI NATH TILHARI

... ... Facts of the case: ... The defendant borrowed Rs.12,00,000/- on 20.03.2018, later issued a cheque for Rs.10,00,000/- that ... Jurisdiction of High Court regarding interference with trial court orders - Defendant's application to send promissory note for forensic ... continuous applications for forensic examination were unwarranted and unsubstantiated, as previous investigations did not yield ... Towards part payment of the principal and interest, the defendant issued a cheque for an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- on ....

A. Sivagnana Pandian VS M. Ravichandran

2010 0 Supreme(Mad) 5546 India - Madras

S.PALANIVELU

Indian Evidence Act - Referral of Cheque to Forensic Science Expert - Section 45 Fact of the Case: The petitioner ... The petitioner filed an application under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act to refer the cheque to the Forensic Science Expert ... Issues: The main issue was whether the cheque should be referred to a forensic expert to ascertain the age of the ink, as ... No. 2077 of 1995 to send the cheque Exhibit A-1 (Cheque No. 991836) to th....

A.  Sivagnana Pandian VS M.  Ravichandran

2010 0 Supreme(Mad) 5550 India - Madras

S.PALANIVELU

The petitioner filed an application to refer the cheque to a forensic science expert to ascertain the age of the ink. ... to a forensic science expert to ascertain the age of the ink. ... Indian Evidence Act - Section 45 - The petitioner filed an application under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act to refer the cheque ... Hence, the age of the ink utilised for signature by the petitioner has to be ascertained by the forensic expert. Then only, the factual back ground would come to light and hence the....

Elumalai VS Subbaramani

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

S.PALANIVELU

No.2077 of 1995 to send the cheque Ex.A1 (Cheque No.991836) to the Forensic Department for obtaining the expert’s opinion and the Scientific Assistant DW1 also, in support of the case of the accused, has stated in the report Ex.D3 that the person, who has written S34, has not written S1 and that in the ... cheque within the validity period for the purpose of limitation.” ... In the book Forensic Science in Criminal Investigation and Trials by B.R. ... Mohan, Assistant Director, Document Division, #HL_ST....

Elumalai VS Subbaramani

2011 0 Supreme(Mad) 16 India - Madras

S.PALANIVELU

No.2077 of 1995 to send the cheque Ex.A.1 (Cheque No.991836) to the Forensic Department for obtaining the expert's opinion and the Scientific Assistant D.W.1. also, in support of the case of the accused, has stated in the report Ex.D.3 that the person, who has written S34, has not written S1 and that ... In the book Forensic Science in Criminal Investigation and Trials by B.R. ... Mohan, Assistant Director, Document Division, Forensic Science Department appeared. The learned Judge quizzed him as to the ....

K.Ravi vs The Inspector of Police, Namakkal Police Station

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 775 India - High Court of Madras

D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J

... ... Result: Criminal Revision Cases are allowed; judgments of lower courts set aside, and accused acquitted. ... Before this Court, additional evidence in the form of an expert opinion, from a Private forensic lab stating that said signature is forged was being produced. ... was issued, but, however, the same bounced. ... However, when P.W.2 has, in the cross-examination, contradicted the evidence of P.W.1 by admitting that he issued notice for bouncing of cheques stating that the cheque was issued....

Vipin Aggarwal VS State of Haryana

2014 0 Supreme(P&H) 1371 India - Punjab and Haryana

JITENDRA CHAUHAN

During my tenure, in the month of July, I gave one cheque of ` 30,000/- and one cheque of ` 40,000/- and one cheque of ` 50,000/- to Kapil Uppal for purchasing shares. And my cheque of ` 50,000/- bounced, so I gave ` 50,000/- in cash to Kapil Uppal. ... But to still investigate the matter in detail, a latter was written to Director Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Plot No. 2, Sector 36-A, Chandigarh for DNA test. The CFSL officials asked for the blood sample of ac....

K.  Ravi VS Inspector of Police, Namakkal

2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 250 India - Madras

D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

cheating as also not - Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in which of said judgment it has held - Criminal Revision Cases ... Before this Court, additional evidence in the form of an expert opinion, from a Private forensic lab stating that said signature is forged was being produced. ... was issued, but, however, the same bounced. ... However, when P.W.2 has, in the cross-examination, contradicted the evidence of P.W.1 by admitting that he issued notice for bouncing of cheques stating that the #HL_START....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top