AI Overview...
- Goswami Gobind Lal - Main points and insights:
- The references primarily involve legal cases and decisions related to property possession, auction rights, and eviction proceedings involving Goswami Gobind Lal or related parties.
- Several cases, notably Roshan Lal Goswami v. Gobind Ram (AIR 1963 Punj 532), establish that provisional possession granted to auction purchasers confers possessory rights but does not necessarily imply full proprietary rights.
- The case Khunni Lal v. Gobind Krishna Narain (1911) I.L.R. 33 A. 356 discusses adverse possession and its implications on property titles, indicating a historical legal context relevant to Goswami Lal's cases.
- The Punjab High Court and Supreme Court decisions recognize that possession, even provisional, can create encumbrances or rights affecting eviction and property transfer processes.
- The Bishan Pauls case and subsequent rulings clarify that the right to eject tenants or occupants does not always depend on formal certificates, emphasizing the importance of possession rights.
- Multiple references highlight that auction purchasers like Attar Lal have rights to provisional possession, which can impact eviction and property management proceedings.
-
The legal principles from these cases underpin the procedural and substantive rights of parties involved in property disputes, especially regarding possession, eviction, and ownership rights.
-
Analysis and Conclusion:
- The collected case law underscores that provisional possession, such as that given to auction purchasers like Attar Lal, grants possessory rights that can influence eviction proceedings and property claims.
- Goswami Lal's name appears in the context of legal decisions affirming that possession rights—though provisional—are significant and can create encumbrances affecting ownership and legal actions.
- These rulings collectively support the view that possession rights, even if provisional, are protected under law and can be subject to legal disputes concerning eviction and property transfer.
- Overall, Goswami Lal's legal context is associated with property possession rights, auction procedures, and the legal recognition of possessory claims in property disputes.
References: - Roshan Lal Goswami v. Gobind Ram, AIR 1963 Punj 532 - Khunni Lal v. Gobind Krishna Narain, 1911 I.L.R. 33 A. 356 - Mothurmohan Goswami cases and related proceedings - Bishan Pauls case and subsequent judgments
Search Results for "Goswami Gobind Lal"
1963 0 Supreme(P&H) 35 • India - Punjab and Haryana
TEK CHAND, D.FALSHAW
Sub:- ... - Provisional Possession of Property No: XIV/352-54/291-93 Sold on -----in----- DELHI: Whereas it has been decided to give provisional possession of the above said property to Shri-Attar Lal S/o Murli Dass -----R/O----- the auction purchaser of the property, you are hereby
1916 0 Supreme(Mad) 493 • India - Madras
Mothurmohan Goswami - Khunni Lal v. Gobind Krishna Narain - Hanuman Prasad Singh v. ... Mothurmohan Goswami (1898) I.L.R. was based on the ground that the title by adverse possession was completed while the Act of 1859 was in force, seems reasonably clear from a recent decision of the Privy Council in Khunni Lal v. Gobind Krishna Narain (1911) I.L.R. 33 A. 356. ... Gobind Krishna Narain (1911) I.L.R. 33 A. 356 the Judicial Committee intended to point.out thai their de....
1969 0 Supreme(P&H) 183 • India - Punjab and Haryana
D.K.MAHAJAN, A.D.KOSHAL
of the decision in Bishan Pauls case by reason of the fact that provisional possession of the building was transferred to Attar Lal ... It is no doubt true that in Roshan Lal Goswami v. ... Goswami v. ... Gobind Ram, A.I.R. 1963 Punjab 532, that the landlords right to bring a suit for ejectment need not necessarily depend on the issuance of the certificate." ... This is how Capoor J., discussed this remark : ... "In Roshan Lal Goswami v. ... It is to be noted that i....
2015 6 Supreme 593 • India - Supreme Court
RANJAN GOGOI, PRAFULLA C.PANT
The above proposition culled out in a judgment of the Punjab High Court in Roshan Lal Goswami vs. ... Madan Lal Nangia & Ors. ... Gobind Raj, AIR 1963 Punj 532 was approved by this Court to further hold that such proprietary rights occasioned by the delivery of provisional possession creates an encumbrance on the property which can be the subject of acquisition under the LA Act. ... Madan Lal Nangia & Ors., 2003 (10) SCC 321 to contend that the evacuee property vests in the Custodian for the purposes co....
1965 0 Supreme(P&H) 43 • India - Punjab and Haryana
DUA
Falshaw, C.J. and Tek Chand, J.) in Roshan Lal Goswami v. Gobind Raj and others, AIR 1963 Punj. 532. In this case, the Bench disposed of by one order five regular second appeals and civil revision. ... The observations in these two Bench decisions, it is emphasised by the petitioners learned counsel, do not completely harmonise with the view taken by the Division Bench in Gobind Rams case. ... A faint suggestion has also been thrown that if before the transfer certificate the matter of ejectment can lawfully be taken to ....
1973 0 Supreme(Del) 122 • India - Delhi
S.N.ANDLEY, S.N.SHANKAR
(See Roshan Lal Goswami v. Gobind Raj and others A. I. R. 1963 Punjab 532 ). This section 97 provides for recrimination when the seat is claimed by an election petitioner as provided by section 84. ... Genda Lal (A. I. R. 1964 Supreme Court 1200), the Supreme Court held :- ... "if the returned candidate does not recriminate as required by S. 97, then he cannot make any attack against the alternative claim made by the petitioner.
1970 0 Supreme(Del) 56 • India - Delhi
RAJINDAR SACHAR
... ( 10 ) THE right of an auction purchaser who has brought the property at a public auction to evict the allottee was recognised in a case reported as Roshan Lal Goswami v. Gobind Raj a Division bench j udgment of the Punjab High Court. ... The said matter, however, was clearly noticed in the Roshan Lal Goswami s case and in that view of the matter this authority is of no assistance to Mr. Kapur. ... The said matter, however, was clearly noticed in the Roshan Lal Goswami#HL....
1987 0 Supreme(Del) 398 • India - Delhi
S.N.SAPRA, S.S.CHADHA
In Roshan Lal Goswami v. Gobind Ram, 65 Pun LR 852 : AIR 1963 Punj 532, that the landlord s right to bring a suit for ejectment need not necessarily depend on the issuance of the certificate. ... Lal who was an official of the Ministry of Rehabilitation. Mr. Lal has stated that sale in favour of the plaintiff was cancelled vide order dt. Oct. 11, 1969. Then the respondent filed a writ petition in the High Court of Delhi and the same was accepted vide judgment dt. Dec. 6, 1979. ... Debendra Lal....
1966 0 Supreme(P&H) 69 • India - Punjab and Haryana
R.S.NARULA, D.FALSHAW, D.K.MAHAJAN
The Court held that the decision in Roshan Lal Goswamis case, 1963 Pun LR 852: (AIR 1963 Punj 532), was correctly decided and so ... Whether there was a conflict between the two Division Bench decisions of the Court in Roshan Lal Goswamis case, 1963 Pun LR 852: ... The Court held that there was no conflict between the two Division Bench decisions of the Court in Roshan Lal Goswamis case, 1963 ... Goswami v. ... Gobind Ram, 1963 Pun L R 852: (AIR 1963....
2013 0 Supreme(SC) 98 • India - Supreme Court
R.M.LODHA, ANIL R.DAVE
In this regard, he relied upon decisions of the Punjab High Court in Roshan Lal Goswami v. Gobind Raj & Ors. [AIR (1963) Punjab 532] and Jaimal Singh, s/o Jawahar Singh & Anr. v. Smt. Gini Devi [AIR (1964) Punjab 99] and the decisions of this Court in M/s. Bombay Salt & Chemical Industries v. L.J. ... We are in agreement with the view of the Punjab High Court in Roshan Lal Goswami6 that an auction-purchaser on provisional possession being given to him possesses possessory rights, though he does not have....
Filter by Legal Phrase
