AI Overview

AI Overview...

References: - G. Selvakumaran (A-1) VS State by: Deputy Superintendent of Police/Inspector of Police Vigilance & Anti-Corruption, Salem - Madras - NINGAPPA G @ NINGAPPA SAVANT vs STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka - Praveen Chand Mandawaria VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan - K. B. Gupta VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan - Ram Avtar & Co. Through Its Proprietor VS Ibp Company Ltd. - Rajasthan - Mahadev S/o Shri Channappa Honappanavar vs State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan - Pramod Kumar Jha @ P. K. Jha VS State of Jharkhand through CBI - Jharkhand - Om Prakash Jaiswal VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad - Saptarshi Pandey VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad - Suresh Prasad, son of Late Ramdeo Prasad VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand

Search Results for "Grounds for Queshing Fir in Anti Curruption Cases"

G.  Selvakumaran (A-1) VS State by: Deputy Superintendent of Police/Inspector of Police Vigilance & Anti-Corruption, Salem

2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 1879 India - Madras

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

The First Information Report had been registered by the Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption Salem hours on First Information ... Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 - Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) - Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 - Section 482 - Vigilance and Anti-Corruption ... Report was forwarded to the Special Court for Trial of Cases and Prevention of Corruption Act, District and the endorsement in First ... The First ....

NINGAPPA G @ NINGAPPA SAVANT vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 24437 India - Karnataka High Court

S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J

as grounds for quashing. ... ... ... Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the FIR need not be quashed as sufficient grounds for investigation were established ... sparingly in cases where the FIR shows prima facie commission of an offence. ... Therefore, the duty of the Court is that any anti- corruption law has to be interpreted and worked out in such a fashion as to strengthen the fight against corruption. ... The High Court a....

Praveen Chand Mandawaria VS State of Rajasthan

2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 773 India - Rajasthan

SANDEEP MEHTA

Cr.P.C., 1973, Sec. 482; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Sec. 7 — Quashing of FIR and charge-sheet — F.I.R. was registered by ... S.P. — No evidence of demand and acceptance of bribe — F.I.R. does not disclose any offence — Held — As per provisions of Secs. 2 ... above the rank of a constable or the officer as authorised by the State Govt., in this behalf, time to time is entitled to file the F.I.R ... The petitioner has challenged the FIR filed against him on the following #HL_STA....

K. B.  Gupta VS State of Rajasthan

2015 0 Supreme(Raj) 1975 India - Rajasthan

PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition, quashed the cognizance order, and set aside the FIR. ... sanction under Section 19 of the Act is refused while the accused is in office, he cannot be prosecuted after retirement on the ground ... By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the accused-petitioners have prayed for quashing of the FIR No.334/2010 registered at Police Station Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur and also the order dated 9.10.2015 passed by ....

Ram Avtar & Co.  Through Its Proprietor VS Ibp Company Ltd.

2007 0 Supreme(Raj) 1949 India - Rajasthan

K.S.RATHORE

Fact of the Case: The petitioner's dealership was terminated based on an FIR alleging conspiracy and fraudulent activities ... Corruption Cases and has restored the license of the petitioner. ... action of the Anti Corruption Department and also not challenged the FIR by way of filing any writ for quashing the same, therefore, in this writ petition no relief can be granted to the petitioner. ... Further, in the considered view of this Court if challan has not been ....

Mahadev S/o Shri Channappa Honappanavar vs State Of Rajasthan

2024 Supreme(Online)(RJ) 5512 India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur Bench)

Kuldeep Mathur, J

- It is exercised cautiously, especially in corruption cases, as established in judicial precedents. ... and sought quashing of FIR - No prima facie evidence established against the petitioner - High Court dismissed the petition, upholding ... the FIR. ... For the foregoing reasons, this Court is of the opinion that there are no cogent grounds for quashing the FIR in the present case. The present misc. petition is, accordingly, dismissed. All pending....

Pramod Kumar Jha @ P. K.  Jha VS State of Jharkhand through CBI

2008 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1097 India - Jharkhand

AMARESHWAR SAHAY

Corruption - Criminal Proceedings - Prevention of Corruption Act - Section 7, Section 13(2), Section 13(1)(d) - Territorial Jurisdiction ... The petitioner filed a petition for discharge, which was rejected by the Special Judge, leading to the present application for quashing ... It also cited Supreme Court decisions to support the legality of investigation by the same police officer who lodged the FIR, emphasizing ... The Supreme Court in the case of State represented by Inspector of Police, Vigilance & Anti-C....

Om Prakash Jaiswal VS State Of U. P.

2021 0 Supreme(All) 529 India - Allahabad

MOHD.FAIZ ALAM KHAN

Act, 1988 - Section 13 - Anti corruptionFIR – Investigation - Criminal Revision have been preferred against same order passed ... Trial of criminal case is nothing but journey to unearth truth and this course can only be disrupted when some strong compelling grounds ... by Special Judge Anti corruption C B I whereby discharge application applicants petition Section revisionist in Criminal Revision ... Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State-Anti Corrup....

Saptarshi Pandey VS State Of U. P.

2017 0 Supreme(All) 2605 India - Allahabad

RAMESH SINHA, VIVEK KUMAR SINGH

It highlighted the duty of the Court to interpret anti-corruption laws to strengthen the fight against corruption and eradicate it ... cases. ... cases. ... Therefore, the duty of the Court is that any anti-corruption law has to be interpreted and worked out in such a fashion as to strengthen the fight against corruption. ... before the Court for quashing of the FIR on the ground that investigatio....

Suresh Prasad, son of Late Ramdeo Prasad VS State of Jharkhand

2022 0 Supreme(Jhk) 876 India - Jharkhand

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

The court also found that the FIR was not a consequential action of the Lokayukta but an independent action of the Anti-Corruption ... Issues: Jurisdiction of Lokayukta, Violation of Natural Justice, Quashing of FIR Ratio Decidendi: The court held that ... Final Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's prayer for quashing the entire criminal proceeding including the FIR, ... So far as the prayer for quashing/setting aside the entire criminal p....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top