AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
In criminal cases, the marking of material objects is a critical procedural step that requires physical production, proper identification, and adherence to established legal protocols. The courts recognize that the same material object can be marked in related cases when relevant, but emphasize that the original object’s integrity must be maintained. Proper marking and handling ensure the object’s evidentiary value and uphold the fairness of the trial process.

Search Results for "How Material Object is Marked in Criminal Cases"

T. G. Rajaram, Income Tax Officer VS M. A. Jaffar

1997 0 Supreme(Mad) 549 India - Madras

S.M.SIDICKK

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that even though the findings of the Income-tax authority were not binding on the criminal ... Fact of the Case: The accused, a dealer in iron and steel materials, was charged with offences under sections 193, ... by the income-tax appellate authority at Madurai deleting the two amounts covered by the impugned two demand drafts in these two cases ... No. 53 of 1985, and filed documents marked as exhibits P-1 to P-23 and the accused has marked one document each on his s....

Suresh Chandar VS Inspector of Police, Ariyur Police Station

2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 2989 India - Madras

N.ANAND VENKATESH

as a material object before Court at time of trial common knowledge that in cases of this nature golden ornaments that are stolen ... persons, 5 sovereigns of gold bangles and sovereigns of gold ingot was recovered and same was produced before Court and it was also marked ... remains intact and only its form has been changed itself cannot be a ground to deprive the return of property to lawful owner – Criminal ... In this case, it has been specifically admitted by the respondent police that based on the....

MAYAVAN vs STATE OF KERALA

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 42766 India - High Court of Kerala

P.D.RAJAN, J

Criminal - Assault - Indian Penal Code - Section 324 - The act provides penalties for assault causing hurt, interpreted to consider ... Finding of the Court: The court acknowledged the argument of sudden provocation and the absence of a criminal background ... During trial, prosecution examined PW1 to PW7 and marked Exts.P1 to P5. MO1 chopper was admitted as material object. Incriminating circumstances brought out in evidence were denied by the accused while questioning him. He did not adduce any defe....

Francis Kalliath vs The State Of Kerala

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 1 India - HIGH COURT OF KERALA

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J

Issues: Whether a material object marked in one case can be used in another case without being physically produced. ... Evidence - Criminal Procedure - Act Section List - The court emphasized the necessity of producing material objects in both cases ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that there is no substitute for physically producing material objects in both cases when they ... 4.When the same mater....

PREM KUMAR UPADHYAY VS AIR INDIA LTD.

2004 0 Supreme(Bom) 1574 India - Bombay

F.I.REBELLO

The Tribunal has on consideration of the material arrived at the finding of fact. ... . - Acquittal of delinquent-employee of criminal charges on account of benefit of doubt, not precludes management to initiate or ... continue disciplinary proceedings. - It is open to the Management in the case where the delinquent employee is acquitted of criminal ... The first ground on which the High Court interfered with the order of the punishing authorities is therefore, wholly unsustainable. " considering the object of the #HL_ST....

 vs

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 41861 India - High Court of Kerala

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J

It stated that the same material object can be marked in both cases, and there is no substitute for the original evidence. ... Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that a material object from one case can be marked in another case since both are interrelated ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner, involved in two counter cases, sought to recall material and documents marked in ... 4.When the same mater....

L. V. Anandan & Others VS State

2003 0 Supreme(Mad) 630 India - Madras

P.D.DINAKARAN

During trial, the prosecution examined 19 witnesses (P.Ws. 1 to 19), including two approvers (P.W.1 and P.W.2) and the investigating officer (P.W.19), marked 35 documents (Exs.P1 to P35) and produced 56 material objects (MOs 1 to 56). ... 5.2. ... as Ex.P16, could not be looked into, as the same was not marked by the person who had sworn the affidavit, inasmuch as the Court Clerk who marked Ex.P16 is not competent to mark the same, as the said Ex.P16 could not be treated as Court property. ... The #HL_S....

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS PRASHRAM JAGANNATH AUTE

2007 0 Supreme(Bom) 976 India - Bombay

M.G.GAIKWAD, SWATANTER KUMAR, N.V.DABHOLKAR

The Court is required to keep at the back of its mind that the object of assessment is to arrive at reasonable and adequate market value of the lands. ... material is produced and proved before the Court. ... ... (3) The Court has to treat the reference as an original proceeding before it and determine the market value afresh on the basis of the material ... produced before it. ... Certainly discretion must be governed and guided by well established cannons of criminal jurisprudence.....

R. S. Raja Kannappan VS K. R. Periakaruppan

2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 3249 India - Madras

K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

Thus, the trial of an election petition being in the nature of an accusation, bearing the indelible stamp of quasi-criminal action, the standard of proof is the same as in a criminal trial. ... In Polling Station No.259, no authenticated copy of Form 17C has been marked. In Polling Booth No.266, authenticated copy of Form 17C has been marked as Ex.P96. ... Before considering as to whether the charges of corrupt practice were established, it is important to remember the standard of proof required in such cases#H....

Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 131 of 2016 with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 176 of 2016 vs State of Bihar

2025 0 Supreme(Pat) 1319 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

SHAILENDRA SINGH, MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

(Paras 49, 50, 51, 52, 63 and 64) Criminal Law – Just Sentence – With mere passage of time, objects of deterrence ... Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302/149 – Murder and rioting – Common object – If an offence is committed ... Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302/149 and 148 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 374 (2) – Murder and rioting – Common object ... It says an assembly of five or more persons is designated as unlawful assembly if the common object of the persons composing that assem....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top