AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Identification of Accused and Witnesses - During the TI parade, accused individuals were identified by the complainant and witnesses. For example, the witness in INDGUJ00000178186 identified persons exiting a house with the help of light and named three individuals present in court as Devising, Kamlesh, and Daud. Similarly, in other cases, accused were identified through court proceedings or police identification. However, some cases noted that accused were not identified or could not be named, affecting the likelihood of conviction (e.g., IND_HC_KLHC010156232016, IND_HC_KLHC010125472018).

  • Identification of Evidence and Muddamal Items - In some instances, items such as ornaments or clothing were not conclusively identified in court, impacting the evidentiary value (e.g., INDGUJ00000178186).

  • Settlements and Discontinuation of Prosecution - Multiple cases involved parties settling amicably, with respondents expressing no desire to pursue prosecution further. For instance, in IND_HC_HCBM010057612019 and 01100127891, respondents were identified and indicated that the matter was settled, leading to withdrawal of prosecution.

  • Identification in Crime and Exhumation Cases - In cases involving body identification, witnesses identified bodies based on clothes, watches, or skeletal remains, such as in 01000007180, where the exhumed body was identified as the deceased through clothes and personal items.

  • Challenges in Identification and Court Proceedings - Some cases faced difficulties in identification, leading to dismissals or delays. For example, in IND_HC_KLHC010125472018, the petitioner was not identified by witnesses initially, affecting the court's decision to dismiss the application.

Analysis and Conclusion:
Identification of accused and evidence plays a crucial role in criminal proceedings. Witness testimony during TI parades and court identification are primary methods, but inconsistencies or inability to identify accused can hinder prosecution (e.g., cases where accused were not identified or only identified through specific procedures). Settlements often lead to discontinuation of cases, emphasizing the importance of witness testimony and identification in establishing guilt. Overall, the strength of identification evidence varies across cases, impacting trial outcomes and convictions.

Search Results for "Identified as that of"

THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DEVISING DADUBHAI VASAVA

India - Gujarat High Court

R.P.DHOLAKIA, MD SHAH, JJ

Moreover, during the course of TI parade, accused have been identified by the complainant and witnesses. ... and submitted that even the alleged muddamal ornaments have not been identified by Kapilaben in the Court. ... He has also deposed that 20/32 JUDGMENT he has identified all the persons who were coming out from the house of Bhodarbhai with the help of light. ... He has identified three persons present in Court as Devising, Kamlesh and Daud. He has also deposed that after th....

Rajesh Suresh Nishad vs The State of Maharashtra

India - Bombay High Court

Revati Mohite Dere, J

Vilas Anil Gaikwad vs The State of Maharashtra Through Bund Garden Police Station

India - Bombay High Court

SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J

Nidhi vs State

India - Delhi High Court

SURESH KUMAR KAIT

Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are personally present in Court with learned counsel and they have been identified by SI Deepak/IO and submits that matter has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

MR SUNIL Vs STATE OF KERALA

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 35417 India - High Court of Kerala

B.KEMAL PASHA, J

None of the accused were identified. Matters being so, even if the trial against the petitioner is proceeded with, there is no chance for any conviction.

Shiv Kumar vs State

India - Delhi High Court

SURESH KUMAR KAIT

.1202/2020, registered at PS - Bindapur, on grounds of an amicable settlement between parties - Respondent No.2 present in court, identified ... Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court through video conferencing and she has been identified by SI Kunal Kumar/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

Chhotu alias Compotar son of Genduwa Uraon VS State of Chhattisgarh

2018 0 Supreme(Chh) 433 India - Chhattisgarh

PRITINKER DIWAKER, GAUTAM CHOURDIYA

sent to Chirmiri police station; the body was exhumed from a river bed at the instance of accused Nure Alam; and it was ultimately identified ... P-16 which was identified by PW-5 vide Ex. P-6 to be that of the deceased. ... This witness has further stated that on the basis of clothes, he identified the beheaded skeleton to be that of his deceased son. According to him, one wrist watch seized from the spot was also identified by him vide Ex. P-6. ... This Court finds no substance in the argument of the defence counsel th....

GOPI S/O RAJAN,C NO 6544,C P ,VIYYUR vs STATE OF KERALA

2011 Supreme(Online)(KER) 24604 India - High Court of Kerala

V.K.MOHANAN, J

Fact of the Case: The petitioner, a second accused, was convicted for attempted theft under Section 394 of IPC after being identified ... When PW1 was examined in the court he had deposed in terms of the prosecution allegation and he had identified the petitioner as the person who inflicted injury on him. ... It is thereafter on subsequent questioning, A1 confessed having committed the offence in this case and the accused were brought and shown to PW1 who identified them. Consequently, PW8 filed Ext.P6 and P7 report with respect to the n....

UNAISE PATTILATH Vs STATE OF KERALA

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 11418 India - High Court of Kerala

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J

Despite initially being absconding, he later surrendered to the court and was not identified by witnesses, leading the Magistrate ... The witnesses identified only accused Nos.1 to 3 by their names. The petitioner could not be identified by name. So his identification in the box is necessary. These are the two reasons for which the learned Magistrate dismissed his application. He wants to join his duty abroad.

RAMANADHA PRABHU Vs THE MARKETING MANAGER, BHARAT PETROLEUM

2008 Supreme(Online)(KER) 40498 India - High Court of Kerala

JBKOSHY, P.N.RAVINDRAN, JJ

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top