AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • No Request Made - Cannot Allege Prejudice Later
    Main points and insights:
  • A party cannot claim prejudice if no request or objection was raised at the appropriate stage of proceedings. For instance, the court emphasized that without a request or specific objection, allegations of prejudice cannot be sustained later in the case Rumana Begum VS Government Of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh.
  • The principle underscores the importance of raising objections timely to preserve the right to challenge any prejudice.
    Analysis and Conclusion:
  • The legal doctrine prevents parties from later asserting prejudice if they failed to make a request or objection during the proceedings, emphasizing procedural timeliness and fairness Rumana Begum VS Government Of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh.

Search Results for "If no Request was Made Cannot Allege Prejudice Later"

Rumana Begum VS Government Of A. P.

1992 0 Supreme(AP) 133 India - Andhra Pradesh

D.JAGANNADHA RAJU, V.SIVARAMAN NAIR

ADVOCATE - CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS - PREJUDICE - RIGHT TO BE EFFECTIVELY REPRESENTED - PREJUDICE. ... The detenu was not prejudiced by any of the alleged violations of his rights. Issues: 1. ... Whether the detenu was prejudiced by any of the alleged violations of his rights? Ratio Decidendi: 1. ... Responding to this, the Magistrate advanced the period of remand to 2-9-91, while rejecting the request for grant of bail. ... ... ( 21 ) ADVOCATE General submitted t....

Poonam Parihar VS Sher-e-Kashmir University Of Agriculture Sciences And Technology

2002 0 Supreme(J&K) 307 India - Jammu and Kashmir

V.K.JHANJI, S.K.GUPTA

If it is found that he has so prejudiced, appropriate orders have to be made to repair and remedy the prejudice including setting ... The appellant being technical Assistant was not eligible under rules for such sponsorship nor her request ... If no prejudice is established to have resulted there from, it is obvious, no interference is called for. ... If it is found that he has been so prejudiced, appropriate orders have to be made to repair and remedy the p....

Abraham Thomas Puthooran, S/o.  Late A.  Thomas VS Manju Abraham, D/o.  Chacko Thomas

2022 0 Supreme(Ker) 1 India - Kerala

ANIL K.NARENDRAN, P.G.AJITHKUMAR

Appeal - In Transfer Petition appellant contended he has lost faith, trust and confidence in court because Presiding Officer is prejudiced ... Section 24 of Code seeking transfer of case shall not be based on conjectures and mystic maybes - The onus is on the person who alleges ... There is nothing wrong in the respondent's request to have the conciliation talk in the Chambers of the Judge. The very request of the respondent to advance the case and to post the same for counselling reveals her wish to have an early verdic....

Sohan Lal Gupta (Dead) Thr. L. Rs.  VS Asha Devi Gupta

2003 6 Supreme 871 India - Supreme Court

S.B.SINHA, V.N.KHARE

Ghanshyamdas Gupta had been given a reasonable opportunity to participate in the arbitration proceedings and that the arbitrator's request ... that Ghanshyamdas Gupta had been given a fair opportunity to participate in the arbitration proceedings and that the arbitrator's request ... Ghanshyamdas Gupta withdrew his objections in 1998 but later sought to resile from the withdrawal. ... There must also have been some real prejudice to the complainant; there is no such thing as a merely technical infringement of natural jus....

Jagdish Asarpota VS Jagdish Damodardas Asarpota

2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 1345 India - Bombay

R.D.DHANUKA

The court dismissed the chamber summons and made the notice of motion absolute, granting the plaintiff's request for dismissal of ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that caveators must have a caveatable interest and cannot set up title adverse to the deceased's ... Final Decision: The court dismissed the chamber summons and granted the plaintiff's request for dismissal of the caveats, ... totally displacing the case of the plaintiff and which would cause him irretrievable prejudice. ... It was held t....

Chandan Lal Joura VS Amin Chand Mohan Lal

1960 0 Supreme(P&H) 77 India - Punjab and Haryana

TEK CHAND, SHAMSHER BAHADUR

INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 - SECTION 118(A) - BURDEN OF PROOF - CONSIDERATION - BENAMI TRANSACTION - VARIANCE BETWEEN PLEADINGS AND PROOF - PREJUDICE ... held that the initial presumption under Section 118(a) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, that a negotiable instrument was made ... plaintiff's own evidence contradicted his initial claim that he had paid Rs. 25,000 in cash to Mohan Lal on behalf of the firm, and he later ... The variance between the pleadings, and the proof subsequently led, has certainly caused prejudice#HL_....

K.  Sundara Rajan VS Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Central Range, Tiruchirapalli and two others

1971 0 Supreme(Mad) 463 India - Madras

K.S.PALANISWAMY

But his request was turned down, with the result the enquiry, which was conducted by such highly prejudiced officer, was vitiated from the beginning ; and ... (ii) There was no evidence upon which the finding of guilt could be sustained. ... Even before the enquiry was started, the petitioner made repeated representations to the Superintendent of Police that the enquiry should not be conducted by that enquiry officer on account of his prejudice. ... The question is whether, in the performance of his duty, he is expected ....

ASHWIN CHATURBHAI PARMAR VS STATE OF GUJARAT

2008 0 Supreme(Guj) 248 India - Gujarat

H.B.ANTANI

[Para 16] ... Section 219 of the Code cannot be read in isolation. ... with regard to the offences committed during the course of same transaction, the provisions contained in Sections 223(a) and(d) cannot ... the Code as the power of this Court is supervisory in nature and it can only examine the legality or validity of the order but cannot ... It has also been urged by the learned Advocate for the petitioners that on account of the joint trial, prejudice would be caused to them, but the prejudice, whi....

C. V.  Karthikeyan VS P.  Subramanian

2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 4238 India - Madras

T.RAVINDRAN

the said transfer request in the High Court - Petition dismissed. ... against the presiding officer, the High Court would entertain the transfer request and accordingly, seem to have come forward with ... reason or the other, the litigants like the petitioner has developed a wrong notion that if such type of baseless allegations are made ... However, when with reference to the same, the petitioner is unable to substantiate the reason projected by him with acceptable material and as above discussed, when the alleged upset....

Fmc Corporation VS Natco Pharma Limited

2020 0 Supreme(Del) 722 India - Delhi

C.HARI SHANKAR

were necessary to ensure proper trial of the suit and did not cause undue prejudice to the defendant. ... Amendments to pleadings are allowed to ensure proper trial of the suit and do not cause undue prejudice to the other party. 2. ... allowed the amendments to the pleadings, finding that they were necessary to ensure proper trial of the suit and did not cause undue prejudice ... The allegations made in the written statement, filed by the defendant, cannot be seen, in such a circumstance. Mr. ... Proce....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top