AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The main insight from these sources is that Test Identification Parade (TIP) is a cornerstone in criminal proceedings involving IPC Section 392 (robbery). Properly conducted TIPs ensure the accuracy of eyewitness identification, uphold the fairness of trials, and bolster the credibility of evidence. Courts stress that failure to adhere to procedural safeguards in TIP can jeopardize convictions, highlighting its importance in establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Search Results for "Importance of Tip in 392 Ipc"

STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) VS MOHD RAJA @ SHAHNAWAZ

2016 0 Supreme(Del) 2304 India - Delhi

P.S.TEJI

The court emphasized the importance of conducting a judicial TIP of the accused and the admissibility of the disclosure statement ... Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of conducting a judicial TIP of the accused and the admissibility of ... The court also emphasized the importance of conducting a judicial TIP of the accused and the admissibility of the disclosure statement ... P.C. stated that the respondent and Ankit had stopped one person near the dhaba and an amo....

DIPAK RAVA VS STATE OF ASSAM

2015 0 Supreme(Gau) 4 India - Gauhati

B.K.SHARMA

Conviction - Criminal Law - IPC 392 - The judgment discussed the evidence presented in the case and highlighted the importance ... Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for concrete evidence and the importance of Test Identification Parade (TIP ... The court emphasized the importance of Test Identification Parade (TIP) for identifying the accused and highlighted the lack of clarity ... By the said judgment, the accused/appellant has been convicted u/s #HL_ST....

SUMIT VS STATE

2015 0 Supreme(Del) 2902 India - Delhi

INDERMEET KAUR

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of valid evidence and justifiable reasons for actions such as refusal ... were convicted for robbery under IPC Section 397 and 392/34. ... Conviction - Robbery - IPC 397, 392/34 - Summary Fact of the Case: The appellant Deep Singh and co-accused Sumit ... The conviction of appellant Deep Singh under Section 397 of the IPC is set aside. His conviction under Section 392 of the IPC is maintained. Hi....

Rahul@Parcha VS State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

2014 0 Supreme(Del) 273 India - Delhi

V.K.JAIN

The court emphasized the importance of partial darkness, identification during TIP, and the presumption under Section 114 of the ... Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of partial darkness, identification during TIP, and the presumption under ... Robbery - Criminal Law - IPC Section 392/394/34, Section 397, Section 411 - The judgment discusses the identification of the accused ... He was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in defau....

SHADAB @ SALMAN vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6857 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 392, 397, 34 - Appeal against conviction - The appeal challenged the trial court's judgment regarding ... - Importance of public witnesses was emphasized as their non-examination raised doubts about the prosecution case - The Supreme ... the commission of robbery - Identifications made were inconsistent, with eyewitnesses failing to identify the appellant during TIP ... On completion of investigation, charges were framed against the appellant under Sections 392 /34 and 3....

MUJAHIR @ MAJA VS STATE

2016 0 Supreme(Del) 2075 India - Delhi

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

in TIP proceedings. ... IPC - Conviction for Offences under Section 392/34 and Section 394/34 - Summary of Acts and Sections: IPC Section 392, IPC Section ... The appellant was convicted for offences under Section 392/34 and Section 394/34 IPC based on the victim's testimony and evidence ... Mujahir has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 392/34 IPC as also under Section 394/34 IPC#HL_....

JASWANT ALIAS KALE VS STATE (GOVT.  OF NCT) OF DELHI

2015 0 Supreme(Del) 3317 India - Delhi

INDERMEET KAUR

Identification of Accused - Criminal Law - IPC 392/34, IPC 397 - The court discussed the necessity of holding an identification ... Fact of the Case: The appellants were convicted under Sections 392/34 of the IPC read with Section 397 of the IPC for ... The court highlighted the importance of corroborating recoveries with other reliable evidence and emphasized that convictions based ... These appeals filed by appellants Jaswant @ Kale and Jainul Umar have assailed t....

Govind @ Bharat VS State NCT of Delhi

2014 0 Supreme(Del) 1198 India - Delhi

V.K.JAIN

Robbery - Criminal Law - IPC Section 392, Section 397 - The judgment discusses the conviction of the appellants under Section ... 392 of IPC for robbery and the additional conviction of one appellant under Section 397 for using a deadly weapon during the commission ... The appellants were convicted under Section 392/34 of IPC, with one appellant additionally convicted under Section 397 for using ... For the reasons stated hereinabove, the conviction of the appellants Sandeep and Sunny ....

Rajan Devan Muker VS State of Maharashtra

2009 0 Supreme(Bom) 1659 India - Bombay

J.H.BHATIA

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 34, 392 and 397 Forcible robbery Complaint that appellants demanded amount at gun point, snatched ... Therefore, the present appellant is entitled to be acquitted of the charges under Section 392 read with Section 397, IPC. ... pocket Accused and appellant were arrested in some other cases Under Section 379 One witness says he was also robbed by accused In TIP ... Therefore, identification of the accused persons during the test identification parade also cannot be giv....

MASTAN @ AALAM S/O SOHAN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2024 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 31294 India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jaipur Bench)

MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, J

Section 392 of IPC . Section 392 IPC was filed. Learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1 has noticed that there were three cases registered against Mastan @ Aalam and two against Mehmad Kathat. 6. ... He further submits that the applicants are neither named in FIR nor any Test Identification Parade (TIP) was carried out by Investigating Officer. He further submits that in remaining cases against the applicants, the petitioners are on bail.

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top