AI Overview...
-
Recovery from Retired Employees - The Supreme Court and various courts have consistently held that recovery of gratuity or benefits from retired employees is generally impermissible unless specific conditions are met. Notably, recovery is only justified if the employee had given a prior undertaking or consent, or if there was a misrepresentation or fraud involved. The case of Jagdev Singh (2016 SCC 748) emphasizes that recovery without prior notice or undertaking is unlawful, and recovery actions post-retirement are often struck down. S.ROY vs THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION - Kerala, Ramdayal Saxena VS Public Health and Family Welfare Department - Madhya Pradesh, VIMALAKUMAR T vs KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KSRTC - Kerala, Aniruddh Singh VS State Of Uttar Pradesh Thru. Prin. Secy. Agricultural Deptt. Lko - Allahabad
-
Legal Conditions for Recovery - Courts have clarified that recovery of excess payments or gratuity is permissible only under certain circumstances, such as when the employee has given a clear undertaking or consent at the time of pay fixation. Recovery without such prior consent or undertaking, especially after retirement, violates principles of natural justice and established legal precedents. The Jagdev Singh judgment underscores that recovery should be made in reasonable installments if permitted, and only with proper procedural safeguards. Gajendra Singh vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Central Administrative Tribunal, Om Prakash Tripathi, S/o. Shri Sukh Dev Tripathi VS Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Science And Technology, Department Of Science And Technology - Rajasthan, Om Pal Singh VS Meerut Development Authority - Allahabad
-
Judicial Precedents and Principles - The judgments in Jagdev Singh and related cases reinforce that recovery actions must adhere to constitutional protections, procedural fairness, and specific legal provisions. Courts have dismissed recovery petitions where no prior undertaking was provided, emphasizing that post-retirement recovery without procedural fairness is unlawful. The Jagdev Singh case is frequently cited as a key precedent supporting these principles. Vd. Ganesh Sitaram Magar VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, Om Pal Singh VS Meerut Development Authority - Allahabad, Aniruddh Singh VS State Of Uttar Pradesh Thru. Prin. Secy. Agricultural Deptt. Lko - Allahabad, Aneel V. Joshi vs Union of India - Central Administrative Tribunal
Analysis and Conclusion:
Recovery of gratuity or excess payments from retired employees is generally prohibited unless the employee had explicitly undertaken to repay or consented to recovery at the time of pay fixation. The Jagdev Singh judgment (2016 SCC 748) is a landmark ruling that affirms recovery is only permissible under specific conditions, primarily involving prior undertaking or procedural fairness. Courts tend to protect retired employees from post-retirement recovery actions unless strict legal and procedural criteria are met.
Search Results for "Jagdev Singh Recovery from Gratuity"
2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4973 • India - High Court of Kerala
Devan Ramachandran, J
Rafiq Masih (White Washer), Jagdev Singh - The court emphasized that recovery of benefits from retired employees can only occur under ... Recovery - Gratuity - State of Punjab v. ... Issues: Whether the KSRTC's recovery actions against the petitioners for gratuity payments were justified under established ... The dictum in Jagdev Singh (supra) is singularly also vital in these cases, because it is only if there had been any underta....
2017 0 Supreme(MP) 271 • India - Madhya Pradesh
VIVEK RUSIA
Jagdev Singh (2016 SCC 748) - The court discussed the recovery of excess payment from employees belonging to Class-III and Class-IV ... recovery - gratuity - 6th pay-scale - State of Punjab and Others v. ... Jagdev Singh to determine the impermissibility of recovery from Class-III employees and the impact of an employee's undertaking on ... ... The petitioner has filed the present petition being aggrieved by the recovery of Rs.2,99....
2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4974 • India - High Court of Kerala
Devan Ramachandran, J
Recovery - Employee Gratuity - State of Punjab v. ... Court precedents regarding recoveries from retired employees, particularly the judgments in Rafiq Masih and Jagdev Singh. ... Rafiq Masih - Sections governing pension and gratuity recoveries highlight the legal framework where recovery is permissible only ... The dictum in Jagdev Singh (supra) is singularly also vital in these cases, because it is only if there had been any undertaking issued by t....
2024 0 Supreme(Bom) 251 • India - Bombay
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Jagdev Singh (2016) 14 SCC 267, Balbir Singh Bhandari vs. ... Jagdev Singh and Balbir Singh Bhandari vs. State of Uttarkhand to support its decision. ... Jagdev Singh and Balbir Singh Bhandari vs. State of Uttarkhand, and dismissed the petition. ... - from the amount of Gratuity and Pension as detailed in the Gratuity Payment Order dated 05.03.2021 at Exh. ... Jagdev Si....
2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 10480 • India - Central Administrative Tribunal
Dr. Chhabilendra Roul, A
(A) Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Section 4 and 6(a)(b) - Recovery from gratuity payments - The tribunal upheld the refixation ... (Paras 3.1, 5.2) ... ... (C) Legal Conditions for Recovery - The court noted provisions where recovery is impermissible ... but established exceptions based on specific circumstances, including authorizations provided by the applicant for the recovery ... In view of the specific undertaking given by the applicant, the ratio of Apex Court in Jagdev #HL_S....
• India - Allahabad
SANGEETA CHANDRA
Jagdev Singh, and Thomas Daniel Vs. ... Jagdev Singh 2016 (14) SCC 267, Thomas Daniel Vs. ... The Meerut Development Authority sought to recover the excess amount from the petitioner's pension, Gratuity, and other retirement ... Jagdev Singh 2016 (14) SCC 267 has permitted recovery of excess payment to employees if at the time of pay fixation an undertaking was given by them that the authorities would be free to recover#HL....
2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 1302 • India - Rajasthan
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, SAMEER JAIN
Jagdev Singh. ... The recovery of this enhanced TA is the bone of contention in the present petition. ... Recovery - Excess Payment - Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Expenditure) OM dated 29.08.2008, Government ... Further, in Jagdev Singh (2 supra), Apex Court dealt with the case of pay fixation and held that recovery should be made in reasonable instalments. ... Jagdev Singh (Neutral Citation: 2016/INSC/564....
2022 0 Supreme(All) 1646 • India - Allahabad
SANGEETA CHANDRA
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Recovery – Retail dues - Excess payment – Petition has been ... themselves without any misrepresentation of fraud having been played by petitioner cannot be now recovered from him – Impugned order of recovery ... Jagdev Singh, 2016 (14) SCC 267, has permitted recovery of excess payment to employees if at the time of pay fixation an undertaking was given by them that the authorities would be free to recover any excess payment made to them when....
2024 0 Supreme(All) 1665 • India - Allahabad
RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
(A) Writ Jurisdiction - Recovery of excess payment - The petitioner, a retired Class III employee, challenged ... the recovery orders post-retirement, citing Supreme Court precedents that prohibit such actions without prior undertaking or opportunity ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that recovery from a retired employee is impermissible without prior notice ... Jagdev Singh (supra) such recovery may not be permitted. 12. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Consequently, the ....
2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 7910 • India - Central Administrative Tribunal
RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA, A
(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Original Application - Recovery of overpaid gratuity - Applicant claimed recovery was impermissible ... ... ... Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the applicant was aware of his pension entitlements, and recovery from gratuity ... of Rs. 6,25,680/- from his gratuity post-retirement due to alleged overpayment, citing a Supreme Court judgment claiming no recovery ... The Supreme Court’s order in the case of the High Cour....
Filter by Legal Phrase
