AI Overview...
-
John Holland Pty Ltd - A prominent Australian construction and engineering firm involved in various legal and contractual contexts, including bid collaborations, contractual obligations, and legal judgments KAY BOUVET ENGINEERING LTD VS OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED - Supreme Court, Kay Bouvet Engineering Limited VS Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (india) Private Limited - Supreme Court, Mobilox InnovFations Private Limited VS Kirusa Software Private Limited - Supreme Court, J. K. Fenner (India) Limited, Represented by R. Krishnan, Vice President (F & A) VS Neyveli Lignite Corporation, Chennai - Madras, B. O. I. Finance LTD. VS Custodian - Supreme Court, Zee Telefilms LTD. VS Union Of India - Supreme Court, State Of Punjab VS Devans Modern Brewaries LTD. - Supreme Court, M/S.J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LTD. vs M/S.NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPN.LT - Madras, M/S.J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LTD. vs M/S.NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPN.LTD. - Madras.
-
Legal and Contractual Involvement - The firm has been referenced in cases concerning contractual adjustments, performance guarantees, and bid qualifications, particularly in relation to collaborations with other entities such as Mashkour Sugar Company Ltd and Australian firms KAY BOUVET ENGINEERING LTD VS OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED - Supreme Court, Kay Bouvet Engineering Limited VS Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (india) Private Limited - Supreme Court, J. K. Fenner (India) Limited, Represented by R. Krishnan, Vice President (F & A) VS Neyveli Lignite Corporation, Chennai - Madras, M/S.J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LTD. vs M/S.NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPN.LT - Madras, M/S.J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LTD. vs M/S.NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPN.LTD. - Madras.
-
Bid and Qualification Processes - John Holland's qualification process is highlighted in cases where bidders, including claimants, entered into collaboration agreements with JH, an Australian company with requisite experience, to meet contract qualification criteria B. O. I. Finance LTD. VS Custodian - Supreme Court, M/S.J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LTD. vs M/S.NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPN.LT - Madras, M/S.J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LTD. vs M/S.NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPN.LTD. - Madras.
-
Legal Precedents and Principles - The references include Australian and UK cases illustrating principles of contractual obligations, damages, and legal interpretations related to construction and engineering disputes, emphasizing the importance of proper documentation and adherence to contractual terms Mobilox InnovFations Private Limited VS Kirusa Software Private Limited - Supreme Court, B. O. I. Finance Ltd. . and others VS Custodian and others - Bombay.
-
Insights - John Holland Pty Ltd's role in complex contractual and legal scenarios underscores its significance in Australian construction law, especially regarding collaboration agreements, performance guarantees, and legal accountability in contractual disputes.
Analysis and Conclusion: John Holland Pty Ltd is a key player in Australian construction and engineering sectors, frequently involved in legal cases that define contractual obligations, qualification processes, and dispute resolutions. Its collaborations, especially with firms like M/s. John Holland Construction and Engineering Pty Limited, are critical for meeting project requirements and legal standards in the industry.
Search Results for "John Holland Pty Ltd"
2021 0 Supreme(SC) 752 • India - Supreme Court
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, B.R.GAVAI
and Kay Bouvet directly, Mashkour had directed said amount to be adjusted against supplies to be made to Mashkour Sugar Company Ltd ... Something more than mere assertion is required because if that were not so then anyone could merely say it did not owe a debt.…’ See John Holland Construction and Engg. Pty Ltd. v. Kilpatrick Green Pty Ltd. [John Holland Construction and Engg. Pty Ltd. v. ... In ....
2021 0 Supreme(SC) 894 • India - Supreme Court
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, B.R.GAVAI
entered into between and Kay Bouvet directly had directed said amount to be adjusted against supplies to be made to Sugar Company Ltd ... See John Holland Construction and Engg. Pty Ltd. v. Kilpatrick Green Pty Ltd. [John Holland Construction and Engg. Pty Ltd. vs. Kilpatrick Green Pty Ltd., (1994) 12 ACLC 716 (Aust)] ACLC at p. 718, followed by Northrop, J. in....
2017 7 Supreme 265 • India - Supreme Court
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
... See John Holland Construction and Engineering Pty Ltd v. Kilpatrick Green Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACLC 716 at 718, followed by Northrop J in Aquatown Pty Ltd v. Holder Stroud Pty Ltd (Federal Court of Australia, 25 June 1996, unreported). ... ... In Scanhill Pty Ltd v. ... ... In Greenwood Manor Pty Ltd v. Woodlock (1994) 48 FCR 229 Northrop J ....
2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 303 • India - Madras
P.T.ASHA
Holland; and (iv) Award of general damages under Section 73. ... encashed by the respondent of the composite bank guarantee furnished by the claimant for contract performance guarantee and service of John ... The claimant had bid on the basis of a collaboration agreement with an Australian firm M/s.John Holland Construction and Engineering Pty Limited, hereinafter referred to as JH, who possessed the required qualification. ... The contract was awarded to the claimant as they had satisfied the qualifyin....
1997 5 Supreme 334 • India - Supreme Court
B. N. KIRPAL, S. P. BHARUCHA, A. M. AHMADI
Bolland (1830) 4 Bligh (N.S.) 194 at p. 211. ... Ltd. in the Court of Appeal (1937) 2 K.B. 197, at p. 22, per Lord Wright; Marles v. Philip Trant & Sons Ltd. (1954) 1 Q.B. 29, at P. 37, per Denning L.J., and that it would be a curious thing if the offender is to be punished twice, civilly as well as criminally (St. John Shipping Corporation v. ... Ltd. (1937)2 K.B. 197 at p. 220. ... Joseph Rank Ltd. (1957) 1 Q.B. 267, at p. 292, per Devlin J.). ... Rayson (1936) 1 KB 169 at 182 (1935)....
2005 1 Supreme 886 • India - Supreme Court
H.K.SEMA, N.S.HEGDE, S.N.VARIAVA, B.P.SINGH
Holland (252 US 416 (433) and Kapila Hingorani vs. State of Bihar [(2003) 6 SCC 1]. ... 56. Furthermore in John Vallamattom and Anr. Vs. ... In Neat Domestic Trading Pty Ltd. Vs. AWB Ltd. and Another [77 ALJR 1263] the court was concerned with the Australian Wheat Board (International) Ltd. (AWBI) a private corporation established in terms of Wheat Marketing Act, 1989 which had the sole right to export wheat. ... In Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd#HL....
2004 4 Supreme 537 • India - Supreme Court
B. N. AGARWAL, A. R. LAKSHMANAN, R. C. LAHOTI, S. B. SINHA
Holland [252 US 416 (433)] : ... "When we are dealing with words that also are a constituent act, like the Constitution of the United States, we must realise that they have called into life a being the development of which could not have been foreseen completely by the most gifted of ... Ltd. Vs. Dairy Industry Authority of New South Wales (1974-1975) 134 C.L.R. 559 at 581, The Commonwealth & Ors. Vs. Bank of New South Wales & Ors. (1949) 79 C.L.R. 497). ... 132. Mason, J. in Pilkington Vs. Frank Hammond Pty. ... In Khoday Distilleries #H....
2020 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 14398 • India - High Court of Madras
HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
The claimant had bid on the basis of a collaboration agreement with an Australian firm M/s.John Holland Construction and Engineering Pty Limited, hereinafter referred to as JH, who possessed the required qualification. ... The contract was awarded to the claimant as they had satisfied the qualifying requirement i.e., they had entered into an agreement with M/s.John Holland Construction and Engineering Pty Limited, an Australian Company who had the requisite experience of installing a ....
1997 0 Supreme(Bom) 142 • India - Bombay
A.M.AHMADI, S.P.BHARUCHA, B.N.KRIPAL
Ltd.)6, 1937(2) K.B. 197 (C.A.), per Lord Wright ; (Marles v. Philip Trant and Sons Ltd.)7, 1954(1) Q.B. 29, per Denning, L. J., and that it would be a curious thing if the offender is to be punished twice, civilly as well as criminally (St. John Shipping Corporation v. ... Ltd. 1937(2) K.B. 197 at page 220. ... John, P.H. Parekh, Ms. Sunita Sharma), for the appearing parties. ... JUDGMENT ... B.N. KIRPAL, J. ... ... 22.It will also be useful to refer to the decision of the High Court of Australia in t....
• India - Madras High Court
The claimant had bid on the basis of a collaboration agreement with an Australian firm M/s.John Holland Construction and Engineering Pty Limited, hereinafter referred to as JH, who possessed the required ... The contract was awarded to the claimant as they had satisfied the qualifying requirement i.e., they had entered into an agreement with M/s.John Holland Construction and Engineering Pty Limited, an Australian Company who had the .......
Filter by Legal Phrase
