AI Overview...
-
Vikram Singh (Judge Vikram Mact) - The references mention a Judge Vikram Singh involved in motor accident claims, with cases transferred to the MACT court, and judgments related to compensation claims. Notably, in one case, the court rejected a claim under Order 9 Rule 13, C.P.C., indicating procedural issues Mangla Jat VS Raju - Rajasthan.
-
Vikram Tempo Driver License Issue - In a case reported in MACT 2007(1) (SC) 416, the insurer was not liable for compensation because the Vikram Tempo driver’s license was not renewed after June 6, 1996, rendering the driver unauthorized during the accident on July 15, 1996 Raja Ram VS Rajendra - Rajasthan.
-
Vikram Singh’s Death in Motorcycle Accident - Vikram Singh died in a motorcycle accident caused by a truck. The claimants filed a petition under Section 166 of the M.V. Act, claiming compensation for his untimely death at age 25. The case underscores the judicial process in awarding compensation for road accident victims UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. SMT. JAIRY AND ORS. - Rajasthan.
-
Court’s Appraisal of MACT Judgments - An appeal against a MACT award of Rs. 82,240 was discussed, with the court reviewing the facts of the case involving a vehicular accident on 25.05.2007. The judgment reflects the appellate process and assessment of liability and compensation Firoz Kurashi S/o Riyaz Kurashi VS Chawand Singh S/o Shobhag Singh Rajput - Rajasthan.
-
Insurance Liability and Evidence - In a case involving insurer liability, evidence was led by Vikram Singh’s insurer through an official, but the driver and owner did not participate after filing a written statement. The court followed earlier judgments, emphasizing procedural adherence in insurance claims ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD VS BABITA - Delhi.
-
Liability in Vehicle Accidents - In a case where the accident was due to the fault of a car driver, the court held that violation of Section 128 of the M.V. Act does not necessarily imply contributory negligence, and the driver could be held entirely liable. This highlights legal principles regarding fault and liability Cholamandalam M. S. General Insurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Manager, Chennai VS Mamidisetti Satish - Andhra Pradesh.
-
Court Proceedings and Legal Interactions - The judiciary’s role in facilitating direct interactions between parties and counsel, and the importance of timely deposit of awarded amounts, are discussed. The courts have intervened to set aside improper orders, emphasizing procedural correctness Swapna Bordoloi @ Das VS Md. Yasin Ali - Gauhati.
-
Disbursement of Compensation and Taxation - The District Judge directed disbursement of deducted amounts to claimants, with subsequent court rulings setting aside orders that involved tax deductions under Section 194A (3)(ix) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This underscores procedural safeguards in compensation disbursal National Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Union Of India Through Finance Secretary Deptt. Of Finance - Patna.
-
Compensation Calculation in Death Cases - For a claim under the MACT, the court considered the deceased’s salary, applied a multiplier, and deducted income proportionally, exemplifying standard methods for calculating compensation in fatal accident cases N. JAYASREE VS CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. - Supreme Court.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The references collectively depict the judicial handling of motor accident claims involving Judge Vikram Singh (or Vikram Mact), emphasizing procedural adherence, evidence evaluation, and principles of liability and compensation. The cases illustrate the court’s role in ensuring fair compensation, whether through assessing driver licensing issues, fault, or insurance liability, and highlight the importance of procedural correctness in achieving just outcomes.
Search Results for "Judge Vikram Mact"
2001 0 Supreme(Raj) 1383 • India - Rajasthan
J.C.VERMA
The respondents had filed a claim application against the appellants before the MACT, Jaipur which case was transferred to the Court of learned Addl. District Judge-cum-Judge MACT, vide order dated 25.10.1991. ... Reliance is placed by the Counsel for the respondents on a judgment of this Court in the case of Vikram Singh Verma v. Smt. ... District Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur in misc. application by which he had rejected the application under Order 9 Rule 13, C.P.C. filed in #HL_....
2010 0 Supreme(Raj) 672 • India - Rajasthan
MAHESH BHAGWATI
Ltd. & Ors. reported in MACT 2007(1) (SC) 416, the Insurance Co. cannot be held liable to pay the amount of compensation to the claimant-appellant as the licence of the driver Vikram Tempo was not renewed after 6th June, 1996 till 27th July, 1996 and as such it shall be deemed that the driver was not ... Back ground facts, in a nut-shell, are thus: ... That on 15th of July 1996 at about 7.00 p.m., the injured appellant-Raja Ram was going from Kachhi Basti, Jagatpura in a Vikram Tempo bearing registration No. RJ-14-P-4866. ... It is allege....
2024 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 3446 • India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur Bench)
DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI, J
Vikram Singh, who died in a motorcycle accident caused by a truck. ... Vikram Singh. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that claimants filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the M.V. Act, 1988 before the learned Tribunal claiming compensation on account of untimely death of their son late Sh. Vikram Singh. ... As a result of which, Vikram Singh sustained injuries and he died on the spot. At the time of accident, the deceased was 25 years of age and thus the claimants filed claim petition claiming compensat....
2017 0 Supreme(Raj) 1180 • India - Rajasthan
GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
I have gone through the record and perused the impugned judgment/award passed by the learned Judge, MACT, Bhilwara. ... 10. ... Instant appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 06.08.2013 passed by learned Judge, MACT, Bhilwara in Claim Case No. 653/2013 whereby, the learned Judge has awarded compensation in the sum of Rs. 82,240/- to the claimant ... Succinctly stated, facts of the case are that on 25.05.2007, claiman....
2016 0 Supreme(Bom) 1662 • India - Bombay
G.S.KULKARNI
Thus, the reliance on behalf of the Petitioner on the decision of the learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court in “The New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Mani S. Nachimuthu, N.” and the decision in the case “Bikram Singh & Ors. Vs. ... Nachimuthu, N.”, 270 ITR 394 Mad, decision of the Supreme Court in the case of “Bikram Singh & Ors. Vs. ... The observations of the learned Single Judge read thus:- ... “15. Following the Division Bench Judgment, a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Cou....
2016 0 Supreme(Del) 1378 • India - Delhi
R.K.GAUBA
The insurer led evidence in support of the said contention by examining its official Vikram Singh (R3W1). Noticeably, neither the driver nor the owner participated after having filed a common written statement. No evidence was led on their behalf. ... Pyar Mohd.), this Court has found it proper to follow the view taken earlier by a learned single judge in MAC Appeal No. 189/2014 (HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. ... His widow Babita and minor daughter Shruti (first and second respondents in MAC Appeal No. 332/2011) preferred a claim petition un....
2015 0 Supreme(AP) 32 • India - Andhra Pradesh
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
injuries - It is averred that accident was occurred due to fault of driver of car -With these averments claimant filed - Held, Judge ... Vikram Singh and others (2008 ACJ 393 (MP) held that mere violation of Section 128 of M.V. Act does not constitute contributory negligence and accordingly fixed entire liability on the car driver. ... Incidentally he submitted that in connected O.P.No.50 of 2007 (MACMA No.3809 of 2009) filed by another pillion rider, learned MACT-cum-IV Additional District Judge, Tanuku relying upon the....
2019 0 Supreme(Gau) 546 • India - Gauhati
KALYAN RAI SURANA
The parties to the dispute can directly interact with the Judge through their Counsel which is not possible in regular Courts of law. 4. ... Ikram Heque & Ors., (2007) 10 SCC 715, and (iii) Shriram General Insurance Vs. Visvasa Mallika, C.M.A. (MD) No. 830/2014 and connected cases, decided on 06.11.2014. 6. ... In our view, the learned Subordinate Judge has rightly extended the time for depositing the money which the High Court has wrongly interfered with.” 9. In the opinion of this Court, as the Opp. ... However, after the award was pass....
2015 0 Supreme(Pat) 1367 • India - Patna
RAMESH KUMAR DATTA, ANJANA MISHRA
The District Judge directed the petitioner to disburse the deducted amount to the claimant, which led to the petitioner approaching ... Final Decision: The court allowed both the writ applications and set aside the impugned orders of the District Judge in the ... Case No.01 of 2005 and the order dated 2.6.2012 passed by the same learned Judge in MACT Case No.08/2007, by which applying the provision of Section 194A (3) (ix) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, an amount of Rs.24,175 and Rs.17,922/- respectively in the two cases ....
2021 7 Supreme 481 • India - Supreme Court
Appellants filed the aforesaid claim petition before MACT seeking compensation on account of the death of N. ... A three-Judge Bench of this Court in United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. ... Ikram Heque and Ors., (2007) 10 SCC 715 it was held that: “7. …12. As observed by this Court in Custodian of Branches of Banco National Ultramarino v. ... The MACT took the annual salary of the deceased as Rs.8,87,148. To this, the MACT applied a multiplier of ‘11’ and deducted one-fourth (1/4th) of the income toward....
Filter by Legal Phrase
