AI Overview

AI Overview...

Judgement Related Railway Ticket Scam

Analysis and Conclusion

The sources collectively depict a pattern of railway ticket scams involving forgery, employee collusion, and systemic fraud, often linked to larger criminal or financial scandals. The judiciary has addressed procedural irregularities and emphasized the need for concrete evidence to substantiate allegations. These incidents underscore ongoing challenges in railway revenue security and the importance of vigilant enforcement to curb such scams.

References: - Rajesh Suryakant Dhaka VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, J.Ananda Kumar vs Union of India - Central Administrative Tribunal, Union of India, through General Manager VS Shridhar R. & others - Bombay, Y. Balaji VS Karthik Desari - Supreme Court, Narmada Bai VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat, Narmada Bai VS State of Gujarat - Supreme Court, Y. BALAJI vs KARTHIK DESARI & ANR. - Supreme Court

Search Results for "Judgement Related Railway Ticket Scam"

Rajesh Suryakant Dhaka VS State of Maharashtra

2006 0 Supreme(Bom) 1334 India - Bombay

ROSHAN DALVI, J.N.PATEL

A railway ticket no.18750 Exhibit-148 is for Rs.46/- which is from Malad to Churchgate issued in July, 1992. The other railway ticket no.18751 exhibit-151 for Rs.46/- is also issued from Malad to Churchgate showing that it was issued in July, 1992. ... It must be remembered that this was in 1992 at the height of the Securities Scam in which interalia one Harshad Mehta was involved. The family of the victim boy is stated to be known to or distantly related with the said broker concerned....

J.Ananda Kumar vs Union of India

2024 Supreme(Online)(Supreme(Cat)) 14456 India - Central Administrative Tribunal

Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, AM, M. Swaminathan, J

using forged railway tickets. ... (A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Service removal - Disciplinary proceedings for LTC scam - Applicant’s removal ... of the case: ... The Applicant, previously an Upper Division Clerk, faced disciplinary action for alleged involvement in a LTC scam ... During the year 2009, when the Applicant went to Egmore Railway Station, Chennai, for booking railway tickets, he met one Mr. Ganapathy, who introduced himself as an....

Union of India, through General Manager VS Shridhar R. & others

2002 0 Supreme(Bom) 701 India - Bombay

R.J.KOCHAR

The court also referred to various judgments related to the scope of jurisdiction, existing rights of the claimants, and the absence ... It further appears that a kind of overtime scam is going on in the Railways. ... It is further expected that the documentary evidence in respect of some ticket checkers who were working at a particular station in the year 1980 or 1981 should have been produced by the Railways before the Labour Court as it was the best record available with the Railways#HL_END....

Y.  Balaji VS Karthik Desari

2023 0 Supreme(SC) 526 India - Supreme Court

KRISHNA MURARI, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

case: ... Various parties challenged the High Court's orders affecting an investigation into corruption linked to a job-for-cash scam ... Despite the fact that the allegations of Devasagayam related to payment of money to an employee of the Transport Corporation for procuring a job for his son, the offences under the PC Act were not included in the FIR. Interestingly, Devasagayam is a retired employee of the Railways. ... In support of this contention, the learned senior counsel relies upon the decision of this Court in Management of th....

Narmada Bai VS State of Gujarat

2011 0 Supreme(Guj) 234 India - Gujarat

P.SATHASIVAM, B.S.CHAUHAN

Judgment ... P. Sathasivam, J. ... Saleema Begum was residing in Government Railway Quarters. It was Kalimuddin, who seems to have approached by somebody who invited Sohrabuddin and his wife Kausarbi from their hide out in Madhya Pradesh to Hyderabad. This happened in the middle of November, 2005. ... In respect of the same, an FIR was registered in Ahmedabad Railway Police Station of Gujarat vide CR No. 294/06 under Sections 307, 224, 225, 34 of Indian Penal Code (in short “IPC”) and Section 25(1)(AB) of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 13....

Narmada Bai VS State of Gujarat

2011 3 Supreme 153 India - Supreme Court

B.S.CHAUHAN, P.SATHASIVAM

JUDGMENT ... P. Sathasivam, J. ... Saleema Begum was residing in Government Railway Quarters. It was Kalimuddin, who seems to have approached by somebody who invited Sohrabuddin and his wife Kausarbi from their hide out in Madhya Pradesh to Hyderabad. This happened in the middle of November, 2005. ... In respect of the same, an FIR was registered in Ahmedabad Railway Police Station of Gujarat vide CR No. 294/06 under Sections 307, 224, 225, 34 of Indian Penal Code (in short “IPC”) and Section 25(1)(AB) of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 1....

Y. BALAJI vs KARTHIK DESARI & ANR.

2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 2119 India - Supreme Court

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J

(A) Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Sections 3 and 2(1)(u) - Allegations of bribery related to public employment - Complaints ... Despite the fact that the allegations of Devasagayam related to payment of money to an employee of the Transport Corporation for procuring a job for his son, the offences under the PC Act were not included in the FIR. Interestingly, Devasagayam is a retired employee of the Railways. ... In support of this contention, the learned senior counsel relies upon the decision of this Court in Management of ....

Y. S. Sowbhagya, W/o. Late Y. S. Vivekananda Reddy VS State of Andhra Pradesh

2020 0 Supreme(AP) 98 India - Andhra Pradesh

U.DURGA PRASAD RAO

In Subrata Chattoraj (2 supra), which relates to Sarada Chit Fund Multi State Investment Scam, the Apex Court while referring to State of West Bengal’s case (1 supra) and other cases, having observed that apart from the sensitivity of the issues involved, especially interstate ramifications of the scam ... During the Assembly elections in the year 2014, he was elected on the ticket of YSR Congress Party from Jammalamadugu Constituency and later, having been not satisfied with the functioning of said party, he joined Telu....

RAMANJANEYASWAMI VIDHYA SAMSTHE VS STATE OF KARNATAKA

1999 0 Supreme(Kar) 597 India - Karnataka

T.S.THAKUR

( 18 ) IN Satyapal Anand v Union of india, relied upon by the respondents the court was called upon to examine whether the states and union territories had taken adequate steps towards implementation of the order made by their lordships in unni krishnan's case, supra, insofar as the same related ... The court observed:"the only other contention relates to the arbitrariness of the cutoff date of 1-4-1989. ... Courts need not enter into the thicket of executive policy and reframe such policies especially at the instance of a person who cann....

SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA

2015 8 Supreme 65 India - Supreme Court

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J.CHELAMESWAR, MADAN B.LOKUR, KURIAN JOSEPH, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

Allwright 321 U.S. 649 at 669 (1944) "that adjudications of the Court were rapidly gravitating 'into the same class as a restricted railroad ticket, good for this day and train only’”." ... Learned counsel while relying upon Gannon Dunkerley and Co. v. ... Little, as in her view, gratitude and loyalty, were closely related. A beneficiary could show gratitude to a benefactor, through an expression of loyalty. ... Pollak et al. 343 U.S. 451 (1952), the Supreme Court of United States dealt with a question whether in the District of Columbia, the Constitution ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top