Judicious Exercise of Discretion - The sources consistently emphasize that courts and tribunals must exercise discretion judiciously, considering relevant circumstances, legal principles, and ensuring fairness. Non-exercise or improper exercise of discretion can be challenged through proper remedies, including extraordinary jurisdiction if applicable. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. VS Union of India - Rajasthan, R. Srinath VS State by The Inspector of Police - Madras, Kabi Pradhan VS Union Of India, Represented Through General Manager, East Coast Railway, Bhubaneswar - Orissa, Commissioner of Income-tax VS Superintending Engineer, P. W. D. - Rajasthan, Harvinder Sharma @ Harwinder Sharma VS State Of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana, Geegraj VS Nagarmal - Rajasthan
Principles Governing Discretion - Courts are under a legal obligation to exercise discretion responsibly, avoiding arbitrary or blanket decisions that could lead to injustice or improper outcomes. Proper recording of reasons and adherence to procedural rules are vital to demonstrate judicious exercise. R. Srinath VS State by The Inspector of Police - Madras, Geegraj VS Nagarmal - Rajasthan, Kabi Pradhan VS Union Of India, Represented Through General Manager, East Coast Railway, Bhubaneswar - Orissa
Specific Contexts - The importance of judicious discretion is highlighted across various contexts:
Refusal of adjournments: Courts found such refusals not to be in judicious exercise, highlighting the need for responsible discretion. Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd. & another VS Vijay G. Pandit & another - Bombay
Analysis and Conclusion - The overarching insight is that judicial and quasi-judicial discretion must be exercised with fairness, transparency, and adherence to legal principles. Improper or whimsical exercise can be challenged, and courts are obliged to justify their decisions with sound reasoning. This ensures that discretion serves justice rather than arbitrary or capricious outcomes. Proper exercise of discretion upholds the integrity of judicial processes and protects individual rights.
The judgment emphasized the need for judicious exercise of discretion by the ESI Court and the availability of remedies against non-exercise ... of judicious discretion. ... of judicious discretion. ... judiciously, the remedy against such non-exercise of judicious discretion can be availed by the person aggrieved though the proper proceedings including invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction unde....
exercise of discretion. ... The court emphasized the need for judicious exercise of discretion in the interests of justice and highlighted the principles governing ... exercise of discretion by the trial court. ... which may govern exercise of such discretion. ... The courts are, therefore, under a legal obligation to exercise the discretion vesting in them in a judicious manner ....
exercise of discretion by the Tribunal in disbursing the awarded amount. ... exercise of discretion by the Tribunal in disbursing the awarded amount. ... It held that the Amendment Rules did not apply to the award passed before its enforcement and emphasized the need for judicious exercise ... Discretion should not be exercised in a blanket form which may otherwise lead to improper exercise of such power and will frustrate the objec....
exercise of discretion in granting bail. ... exercise of discretion in granting bail. ... The court also emphasized the need for judicious exercise of discretion in granting bail, considering the heinous nature of the crime ... Sudarshan Singh and Others, (2002) 3 SCC 598 has held that ... "Grant of bail though is a discretionary order-but, however, calls for exercise of such a discretion in a judicious manner and ....
It also emphasized the need for judicious exercise of discretion in imposing penalties and the consideration of relevant circumstances ... Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for judicious exercise of discretion in imposing penalties and the consideration ... exercise of discretion in imposing penalties and the consideration of relevant circumstances. ... In the case of negligence, it would be a sound exercise of #HL_STA....
The court found that the refusal of adjournment by the Enquiry Officer was not in judicious exercise of discretion, but it was apparently ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the refusal of adjournment by the Enquiry Officer was not in judicious exercise of discretion ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the refusal of adjournment by the Enquiry Officer was not in judicious exercise ... exercise of discret....
exercise of discretion by the judge. ... The court emphasized the need for judicious exercise of discretion in granting bail and the imposition of stringent conditions to ... exercise of discretion by the judge, and the imposition of restrictive conditions to address concerns of influencing investigation ... In Dataram Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh, (2018) 3 SCC 22, (Para 6), Supreme Court held that the grant or refusal of bail is entirely within the discre....
It highlights the overlapping powers of the Court and the Executive, the need for judicious exercise of discretion by the Court, ... Final Decision: The Contempt Petition was dismissed, and the Court issued directions for the judicious exercise of discretion ... involved in a prohibition offence, the overlapping powers of the Court and the Executive, and the need for judicious exercise of ... Court could judiciously exercise its #H....
exercise of discretion in imposing conditions for the release of seized property. ... exercise of discretion in imposing conditions for the release of seized property. ... exercise of discretion in imposing conditions for the release of seized property. ... What is discretion and how it is to be exercised ? As Coke, J, observed in Rooke's case (referred to in the Law of Ultra Vires by B.C. ... The exercise of discretionary power sho....
The judgment emphasizes the need for judicious exercise of discretion in condoning delay and the requirement for recording reasons ... exercise of discretion in condoning delay. ... It also noted the importance of adhering to the provisions of Order 41 Rule 31 CPC and emphasized the need for judicious exercise ... Often it is said that absence of reasoning may ipso facto indicate whimsical exercise of judicial discretion. 26. In the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.