AI Overview...
Karnataka City Civil Court Case Status Search by Advocate Name
Navigating the Karnataka City Civil Court system can be challenging, especially when tracking cases by advocate name. Whether you're an advocate managing multiple files, a litigant following your suit, or a researcher, knowing how to efficiently search case status is crucial. This guide draws from key judicial precedents and practical insights to help you master Karnataka City Civil Court case status search by advocate name.
We'll cover online tools, procedural insights from landmark cases, and tips for effective tracking. Note: This is general information based on public legal resources and court practices. Legal situations vary; consult a qualified advocate for personalized advice.
Understanding Karnataka City Civil Courts
The City Civil and Sessions Courts in Bengaluru handle a wide range of civil and sessions cases, including suits for recovery, injunctions, property disputes, and more. These courts are structured with multiple divisions (e.g., CCH-28, CCH-35, CCH-62), each presided over by Additional City Civil and Sessions Judges. Cases often reference formats like O.S.No.8562/2024 or involve transfers from lower courts. SRI GURUMURTHY vs SMT MUNILAKSHMAMMA - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37177
Key facts about these courts:
- Located primarily in Bengaluru, serving the metropolitan area.
- Handle high-volume civil litigation, including commercial disputes and family matters.
- Frequently referenced in High Court of Karnataka proceedings for appeals or writs. THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA Vs SRI. D. A. KAMBLE
Searching case status by advocate name typically involves official portals or physical verification, as direct advocate-based filters may require advocate authorization codes in some systems.
How to Search Case Status by Advocate Name
Step 1: Use Official Online Portals
Karnataka Judiciary's e-Courts portal (ecourts.gov.in) and High Court of Karnataka services (karnatakajudiciary.kar.nic.in) are primary tools. Here's how:
- Visit e-Courts Services: Go to services.ecourts.gov.in, select Karnataka > Bengaluru Urban > City Civil Court.
- Case Status Search Options:
- By Case Number: Enter O.S. No., year, and court complex.
- By Party Name: Useful if advocate represents known parties.
- By Advocate Name: Some advanced searches allow filtering by advocate's bar council ID or name (e.g., in High Court linked matters). SRI K N SHANTHA KUMAR vs SRI MALLIKARJUNJAPPA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 944
- High Court of Karnataka Portal: For cases transferred or appealed (e.g., from City Civil Judge to High Court), use the 'Case Status' module. Enter advocate details if available.
Pro Tip: Advocates often use the 'Advocate Login' on NJDG (National Judicial Data Grid) for bulk searches tied to their panel.
Step 2: Offline Verification at Court
For precise case status search by advocate name:
- Visit the court counter with advocate's authorization.
- Reference specific suits like those before LXI City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-62). SRI G ASHOK REDDY vs STATE OF KARNATAKA
- Check cause lists, order sheets, and status boards.
Example from Records: In a case before XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, status updates involved NDPS matters, highlighting the need for advocate-specific tracking. PRANAV S KATAGIHALLIMATH vs STATE BY INTELLIGENCE OFFICER - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9425
Key Judicial Insights from City Civil Court Cases
Recent judgments illustrate common scenarios in Karnataka City Civil Court proceedings, often appealed to the High Court:
Property and Injunction Disputes
- In a Belgaum case transferred to City Civil Court, status quo orders prevented name entries in survey records pending suit resolution. THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA Vs SRI. D. A. KAMBLE
- Quote: The complainant was not entitled to get his name entered in the City Survey Records. THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA Vs SRI. D. A. KAMBLE
Criminal and Sessions Matters
- Clashes at City Civil Court (e.g., 02.03.2012 incident) led to petitions like Criminal Petition No.100205/2019, emphasizing timely status checks. SRI K N SHANTHA KUMAR vs SRI MALLIKARJUNJAPPA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 944
Transfer and Interim Orders
- High Court set aside orders from XIV Additional City Civil Judge (CCH-28) in O.S.No.8562/2024, allowing I.A.No.4. This shows how advocate vigilance impacts status. SRI GURUMURTHY vs SMT MUNILAKSHMAMMA - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37177
Bullet Points on Common Issues:
- Status Quo Orders: Frequent in property suits; check for compliance. THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA Vs SRI. D. A. KAMBLE
- Interim Applications (I.A.): Track via cause lists (e.g., I.A.No.4 in O.S.No.8562/2024). SRI GURUMURTHY vs SMT MUNILAKSHMAMMA - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37177
- NIA and Special Cases: Involve mobile seizures and passports; status updates critical. MD BADAL HOULADAR vs THE NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 29504
Challenges in Searching by Advocate Name
- Limited Direct Filters: Portals prioritize case/party numbers; advocate searches may need cross-referencing.
- Multiple Courts: Cases move between City Civil Judge, Sessions Judge, and High Court (e.g., Infantry Road Police matters). SHIVARAMU Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
- Digital Gaps: Not all older cases (pre-2018) are fully digitized.
Overcoming Them:
- Use bar council enrollment numbers for precision.
- Subscribe to SMS alerts on e-Courts.
- Leverage High Court orders referencing City Civil Courts (e.g., SLPs dismissed by Apex Court). SHRI. JAYYED AHMED S/O IMITYAZ AHMED SAMSI vs SMT. DEEPA CHOLAN - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41204
Role of Advocates in Case Status Management
Advocates are pivotal:
- Panel Advocates: Track via High Court dashboards (e.g., AAG mentions). SHRI. JAYYED AHMED S/O IMITYAZ AHMED SAMSI vs SMT. DEEPA CHOLAN - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41204
- Multi-Case Handling: Seen in suits like O.S.No.274/2018 before Prl. Senior Civil Judge. SRI G ASHOK REDDY vs STATE OF KARNATAKA
- Narcotics and Special Judges: Status in NDPS cases before Special Judges. PRANAV S KATAGIHALLIMATH vs STATE BY INTELLIGENCE OFFICER - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9425
Best Practices for Advocates:
1. Maintain digital logs of case numbers.
2. Use API integrations if available for law firms.
3. File for certified copies promptly for appeals.
Broader Legal Context from Precedents
While not directly City Civil Court cases, related Supreme Court rulings inform procedures:
- Compounding Offences: Quashing under CrPC Sections 320/482 post-compromise. GIAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB - 2012 7 Supreme 1
- Service Law: No automatic regularization for daily wagers. Secretary State of Karnataka VS Umadevi - 2006 3 Supreme 415
- Motor Accident Claims: Insurer liability nuances. National Insurance Co. LTD. VS Swaran Singh - 2004 1 Supreme 243
These highlight the interconnectedness of civil and sessions jurisdictions in Karnataka courts.
Key Takeaways
- Primary Tool: e-Courts and Karnataka High Court portals for Karnataka City Civil Court case status search by advocate name.
- Stay Updated: Monitor cause lists, orders, and High Court interventions.
- Advocate Efficiency: Use authorization for detailed access.
- Caution: Status can change rapidly (e.g., High Court stays). SRI GURUMURTHY vs SMT MUNILAKSHMAMMA - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37177
Disclaimer: This post provides general guidance based on public records and judgments. It is not legal advice. Case outcomes depend on specific facts. Always consult a licensed advocate or check official sources for the latest status.
For hands-on help, visit the City Civil Court, Bengaluru, or use official apps. Efficient tracking ensures justice isn't delayed.
Last Updated: Based on available 2024-2025 records.
Search Results for "Karnataka City Civil Court Case Status by Advocate Name"
2012 7 Supreme 1 • India - Supreme Court
R.M.LODHA, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, ANIL R.DAVE
(Paras 49 and 51) ... (c) The crucial issue in this case is the applicability of sections ... ='00400028934'>2008 (2) Mh.L.J. 856 - Referred ... Facts of the case ... In State of Karnataka v. L. ... A three-Judge Bench of this Court in State of Karnataka v. M. ... While in Nikhil Merchant's case the accused had misrepresented the financial status of the company in question in order to avail
2006 3 Supreme 415 • India - Supreme Court
ARUN KUMAR, P. K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, C. K. THAKKER, Y. K. SABHARWAL, G. P. MATHUR
It was not open to the High Court to impose such an obligation on the State when the very question before the High Court in the case ... But when regular recruitment is undertaken, the respondents in C.A. ... There is no case that the wage agreed upon was not being paid. ... Sentiment is a dangerous will o’ the wisp to take as a guide in the search for legal principles.” ... Learned counsel for the State of Karnataka submitted that ....
1978 0 Supreme(SC) 29 • India - Supreme Court
P. S. KAILASAM, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, V. R. KRISHNA IYER, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, N. L. UNTWALIA, M. H. BEG, P. N. BHAGWATI
State of West Bengal, AIR 1973 SC 1425=(1973) I SCR 856; R.C. Cooper v. ... impounding the passport is made an opportunity of being heard remedial in aim should be given to him so that he may present his case ... The Court was constrained in every case that came before it, to make a search for the duty to act judicially sometimes from tenuous ... justify">These observations were quoted with approval by Hegde, J., (as he then was) speaking on behalf of a Division Bench of the Karnataka ....
1979 0 Supreme(SC) 300 • India - Supreme Court
P.N.BHAGWATI, R.S.PATHAK, V.D.TULZAPURKAR
Irani in the City Civil Court at Bombay and in that suit, an injunction was obtained by the Ist respondent restraining A. S. ... Civil Court. ... Irani who owned Cafe Excelsior filed Suit No. 6544 of 1977 in the City Civil Court, Bombay against the respondents challenging the
1993 0 Supreme(SC) 906 • India - Supreme Court
B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, K. RAMASWAMY, M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, P. B. SAWANT, S. MOHAN
- Contention of counsel for employees/Govt. ... Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 311(2) - Government of India Act, 1935 – Section 240(3) - Civil Services ... Classification Rules, 1920 - Government of India Act, 1919 - Section 96B (2) - Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1850 - Section 25 - Civil ... One of the contentions raised before this Court by the counsel for the petitioner was that a copy of the report of the Administrative ... The Court of Appeal again aff....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41204 • India - THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.G.PANDIT AND GEETHA K.B.
In an identical case, the State had preferred a petition before the Hon’ble Apex Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No.48986/2025. The Hon’ble Apex Court, by order dated 22.09.2025, dismissed the special leave petition. ... THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THE ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD.…PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. GANGADHAR J.M., AAG FOR SRI. SHARAD V. ... THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,....
• India - High Court of Karnataka
R. NATARAJ,SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
to enter his name in the City Survey records. ... Judge, Belgaum, where the Court had passed an order to maintain status-quo. ... Therefore, the complainant was not entitled to get his name entered in the City Survey Records. ... In addition, in respect of the very same property, a suit was filed before the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Belgaum in O.S.No.1477/2011 where an order of status- quo was passed on 1 IN THE HIGH COU....
2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 12242 • India - Karnataka High Court
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH 35) BENGLAURU AS PER ANNEXURE-A. ... NISHIT KUMAR SHETTY., ADVOCATE)AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA Digitally signed by BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER, R HEMALATHA Location: H igh HASSAN WOMEN POLICE STATION, Court of REPRESENTED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Karnataka HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. ... The Apex Court in the case of Karnail Singh (supra) ruled that in special circumstances and emergent situa....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37177 • India - THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
City Civil Judge, Court at Bangalore (CCH-28), in O.S.No.8562/2024, dated 10.07.2025."2. ... (2) The order dated 10.07.2025 passed on I.A.No.4 in O.S.No. 8562/2024 by the XIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City, is set aside.(3) Consequently I.A.No.4 is allowed. ... CITY CIVIL JUDGE COURT AT BANGALORE (CCH-28)IN O.S.NO.8562/2024 DTD 10.07.25 & ETC.THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, TH....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 29504 • India - Karnataka High Court
Krishne Gowda, Advocate)And:The National Investigation Agency, Bengaluru, Represented by Special Public Prosecutor, High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru- 560 001.…Respondent (By Sri. Prasanna Kumar P., Spl.P.P.) ... The NIA conducted search on 08.11.2023 at the house of the accused/appellant and during the search, mobile phone with Banglalink 3G and Banglalink full speed 4G SIM cards were seized, passport having No.A07665213 in the name of Begum Hawha DOB: 11.03.1977 w/o Badol Howlader (....
2004 1 Supreme 243 • India - Supreme Court
V. N. KHARE, D. M. DHARMADHIKARI, S. B. SINHA
court. ... facts and circumstance of each case. ... the victim, the tribunal in its discretion may relegate the insurer to seek its remedy of reimbursement from the insured in the civil ... State of Karnataka 1993 Supp (1) SCC 96, Hanumantappa Krishnappa Mantur and Others Vs. ... State of Karnataka [1992 Supp (2) SCC 213].104. ... In Kamla's case (supra), a Division Bench of this Court summed up the legal position :"The position can
1997 3 Supreme 147 • India - Supreme Court
S. P. BHARUCHA, S. SAGHIR AHMAD, M. M. PUNCHHI, K. VENKATASWAMI, K. T. THOMAS, K. RAMASWAMY, A. M. AHMADI
that the judicial decisions rendered by those who man the subordinate courts and tribunals do not fall foul of strict standards of legal ... the High Court-No appeal from decision of Tribunal will directly lie before Supreme Court under Art. 136-Jurisdictional powers of ... href=act:433~Art.227>227-Power of judicial review of legislative action - Jurisdiction conferred upon High Courts and Supreme Court ... Before we record the contentions of the learned counsel who appeared before us,....
2019 1 Supreme 262 • India - Supreme Court
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, INDU MALHOTRA
(Para 8) ... (c) Motor Vehicles Act ... ... Finding of the Court: ... ... Nos. 1 and 2 and can recover 50% of the amount from Respondent No. 3. ... Pradeep Kumar & 6 Ors., 2014 (3) UC 1687;Karnataka High Court in Lakshman and Ors. v. ... We have heard learned Counsel for the parties, and perused the record. ... Consortium is a special prism reflecting changing norms about the status and worth of actual relationships
2010 8 Supreme 353 • India - Supreme Court
DALVEER BHANDARI, K.S.P.RADHAKRISHNAN
declining bail to appellant -It is a settled legal position crystallized by the Constitution Bench of court in Sibbia’s case that ... means a personal right not to be subjected to imprisonment, arrest or other physical coercion in any manner that does not admit of legal ... the view taken by Constitution Bench in Sibbia’s case- In view of the clear declaration of the law by the Constitution Bench, the ... the clear position of law that by virtue of Article 141 of the Constitution, the judgment of the Co....
1988 0 Supreme(SC) 337 • India - Supreme Court
B.C.RAY, G.L.OZA, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, RANGANATH MISRA, S.NATARAJAN, S.RANGANATHAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
To own up the mistake when judicial satisfaction is reached does not militate against its status or authority. ... In the first place, the argument of the counsel for the respondent runs counter to the observations made by the Supreme Court in ... The attempt of counsel for the respondent is to justify the transfer by attributing the powers of the High Court under section 407 ... If it does, the City Civil Court ha....
Filter by Legal Phrase
