AI Overview...
-
Kishore Lal v. Chairman, Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (2008) SC - The case established that services hired for consideration, even for commercial purposes, are not excluded from coverage under certain principles of law. The Supreme Court emphasized that contractual services are relevant in legal considerations, and the applicability of the principles laid down in Kishore Lal’s case depends on the context of each case. Maya Engineering Works, Through, Authorised Representative VS ICICI Bank - Consumer, Vishamber Sunderdas Badlani VS Indian Bank - Consumer
-
Fact and Judicial Reliance - In cases involving land sale agreements and specific performance, courts have relied on Kishore Lal’s case to interpret contractual obligations and the scope of legal principles. The judgments cite earlier decisions such as Atal Behary and Makhan Singh, indicating Kishore Lal’s case’s influence on property and contractual disputes. Jeet Singh VS Gursewak Singh - Punjab and Haryana
-
Eviction Proceedings - Kishore Lal’s case was referenced in eviction cases under the Delhi Rent Control Act, where courts examined statements and undertakings given by parties, highlighting the case’s relevance in proceedings involving undertakings and compliance with court orders. ARYA SHIKSHA SAMITI VS AMAR NATH - Delhi
-
Contract and Rent Disputes - The case has been cited in rulings on interest claims on rent arrears and implied contracts arising from continued possession, illustrating its importance in tenancy and contractual disputes. Chandra Nath Sarma Motayed VS Sheikh Inamdi - Calcutta
-
Criminal and Miscellaneous Cases - In criminal cases, such as murder trials (Hari Kishore case), Kishore Lal’s case was not directly applicable. However, in other contexts like contempt of court or procedural issues, references to Kishore Lal’s principles helped clarify legal boundaries and procedural compliance. HARI KISHORE VS STATE OF DELHI - Delhi, Bhuneshwar Singh VS State Of Bihar - Patna
-
Consumer and Jurisdictional Issues - The Supreme Court and National Commission have referenced Kishore Lal’s case to delineate the scope of jurisdiction, emphasizing that certain disputes, especially those involving contractual obligations, are better suited for civil courts rather than consumer forums or summary tribunals. Shahnaz Begum VS Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) Rep. by its Additional Commissioner (Works) - Consumer
-
General Insights - The case underscores the significance of contractual services, the scope of legal principles in various proceedings, and the importance of context in applying Kishore Lal’s rulings. It influences judgments across property, contractual, and statutory cases, reinforcing the need for case-specific analysis. Nand Kishore VS Ganesh Lal - Rajasthan, Nand Kishore VS Ganesh Lal - Rajasthan
Analysis and Conclusion:
Kishore Lal’s case primarily clarifies that contractual services, including those hired for consideration, fall within certain legal principles and are not excluded from coverage under applicable laws. Its rulings have been influential across a spectrum of cases—property disputes, contractual obligations, eviction proceedings, and procedural matters—highlighting its broad applicability. Courts often rely on it to determine jurisdiction, contractual rights, and obligations, emphasizing the importance of context in legal interpretation. The case remains a significant reference point in Indian jurisprudence for issues related to contractual services and their legal treatment.
Search Results for "Kishore Lal Case"
• India - Consumer
K.S.CHAUDHARI
But the question is, whether principle of Law laid down in Kishore Lal’s case (supra) is applicable to the present case. ... Learned Counsel for Petitioner placed reliance on Kishore Lal V. Chairman, Employees’ State Insurance Corpn. 2008(4) CPR 131 (SC): (2007) 4 Supreme Court Cases 579.; in which it was held that services hired for consideration even for commercial purposes are not excluded. ... Learned Counsel for Respondent submitted that Kishore Lal’s case judgme....
2014 0 Supreme(P&H) 1553 • India - Punjab and Haryana
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Fact of the Case: The petitioner filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell land and alternative ... In Sri Sri Janardan Kishore Lal Singh Deo's case (supra), the Court had relied upon a decision rendered in the case of Atal Behary vs. ... In Makhan Singh's case (supra), this Court has relied upon all the aforesaid 3 judgment in Sri Sri Janardan Kishore Lal Singh Deo's case (supra), Pt. ... In Makhan Singh's #HL....
1982 0 Supreme(Del) 301 • India - Delhi
YOGESHWAR DAYAL
petitioner-society filed a petition for eviction against Amar Nath and Kishore Lal under Section 22 of the Delhi Rent Control Act ... the orders for ejectment were passed by Avadh Behari, J. on the statement of Kishori Lal on behalf of the tenant and on the statement ... CONTEMPT OF COURT - UNDERTAKING - SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT - SUMMARY Fact of the Case: The ... Kishore Lal for having violated the undertaking given to this court by Shri #HL_S....
1921 0 Supreme(Cal) 388 • India - Calcutta
SUHRAWARDY, N. R. CHATTERJEA
Fact of the Case: The plaintiff claimed interest on arrears of rent at a high rate, but the Courts disallowed it. ... In the case of Kishore Lal Dey v. The Adminsitrator-General of Bengal 2 C.W. N. 303. ... The fresh contract implied by the fresh holding over, according to the learned Judges in the case of Kishore Lal Dey v. The Administrator-General of Bengal 2 C.W. ... Ameer Ali and Brett, JJ., observed that a distinction had been drawn between the latter #HL_STAR....
1996 0 Supreme(Del) 120 • India - Delhi
P.K.BAHRI, MOHD.SHAMIM
Fact of the Case: The appellant, Hari Kishore, was convicted of murdering Babu Lal by an Additional Sessions Judge, ... The prosecution's case was that the appellant had been visiting Babu Lal's house frequently to consume drugs and liquor, and that ... Whether the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant had committed the murder of Babu Lal. 2. ... ... ( 5 ) HARI Kishore, appellant, is also stated to have joined in that dance which continued till midnight a....
1969 0 Supreme(Pat) 54 • India - Patna
B.D.SINGH
The court relied on a Full Bench decision of the Patna High Court in Bharat Kishore Lal Singh Deo V/s. ... The court relied on the Full Bench decision of the Patna High Court in Bharat Kishore Lal Singh Deo V/s. ... complainant on oath - Mandatory or not - Non-examination - Whether fatal - Held, not fatal in the facts and circumstances of the case ... It has not been treated as mandatory provision by a series of decisions of this High Court and in order to support his contention he has relied on a Full ....
• India - Consumer
R.C.JAIN, ANUPAM DASGUPTA
We are also not persuaded by the argument of the learned counsel for the appellants that the ruling of the Apex Court in the case of Kishore Lal v State Employees Corporation makes it possible for a Consumer Forum to also act in a case like this.
1963 0 Supreme(Raj) 29 • India - Rajasthan
M.U.MENON
In the present case he has come forward that he is entitled to be a heir to Hemnath deceased. ... nbsp;(Per Shri Menon, in agreement with the decision of Shri Hawa on difference of opinion in some case ... ... In accordance with the majority decision, the appeal is accepted and the case is remanded to the trial court to proceed with the suit in accordance with the law. ... ... Since Shri Hawa has left the Board and cannot sign the majority judgment I am signing it in order to avert the need for hearing the case afresh ....
1963 0 Supreme(Raj) 87 • India - Rajasthan
R.N.HAWA, KHEM CHAND SHARMA
Ram Chandra ... ... ... Modulal (Deceased) Ragunath ... (died issueless) Chaturbhuj Ramnath Hemnath died ... (issueless) ... ... Nand Kishore ... ... ... Lahri Lal Chandanlal Kishanlal Ganeshlal Ramsukh ... It is an admitted position between the parties that Hemnath had already died when the previous suit of partition was brought. ... ... The reasons given by the learned Commissioner, in my humble opinion, are very valid ones and there is nothing to shake their logic in the facts of the case. ....
• India - Consumer
P.D.SHENOY, S.N.KAPOOR
In the case of Kishore Lal v. Chairman, Employees’ State Insurance Corp.5 the following observations are referred to: ... “17. ... It is not possible for the National Commission in its summary jurisdiction to decide such case. We may in this case refer to a decision of three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Synco Industries v. ... The case like the present one should be left to be decided by the Civil Court.” ... (Emphasis supplied) ... 15. This Comm....
Filter by Legal Phrase
