AI Overview...
-
Krishna Murthy Aiyar v. Krishna Murthy Aiyar (Privy Council) - The case clarified legal principles related to reversals of decisions, referencing earlier cases such as ILR 12 Madras 490 and AIR 1925 Madras 932, establishing authoritative judicial stance on procedural and substantive issues NANAK CHAND VS CHANDER KISHORE - Delhi.
-
Krishna Murthy and Others v. Gurunath & P. N. S. Aiyar v. K. J. Nathan - These cases support the legal arguments involving property disputes and procedural aspects under Section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code, emphasizing the importance of proper legal procedure in such cases DURVASA VS CHANDRAKALA - Karnataka.
-
Yenugu Krishna Murthy & Narayana Murthy - The discussion highlights corporate governance principles, emphasizing ethical conduct in business practices, with references to legal cases and corporate law principles Yashodhara Shroff VS Union of India - Karnataka.
-
Krishna v. Vankatasami & Narasimha Naidu v. Ramasami - These rulings reaffirm principles related to tenancy rights and lease agreements, with specific reference to Rule 4 of Section 11 of Act VIII of 1865, illustrating judicial interpretation favoring tenants under certain circumstances V. R. Krishnasami Aiyar VS Bathi Gadu - Madras.
-
Venkataranu aiyar - The judgment states that the void or voidable status of a deed does not affect possession rights, emphasizing that prayers for possession are independent of the validity of the deed D. Krishna Murthy VS C. Ramana - Andhra Pradesh.
-
Krishna Murthy & Section 24 of the Act - The case discusses the importance of proper reference procedures under Section 24, criticizing improper references that lead to quashing government orders, highlighting procedural correctness in legal references S. I. MUMTAZ YAKOOB SHAH MIAN VS STATE OF MYSORE - Karnataka.
-
Contract Validity & Public Policy - The agreement dated 29-5-1942 was challenged for contravening law and public policy, deemed void and unenforceable, with considerations of limitation period discussed in relation to the suit Kolaparti Venkatareddi VS Kolaparti Peda Venkatachalam - Andhra Pradesh.
-
Case Law on Claims & Procedure - Judicial decisions such as Hussain Sahib, Krishna Satapasti, and Ramaswami Aiyar clarify rules about claims under Section 281, the impact of judgments on parties, and the importance of parties' involvement in proceedings, reinforcing procedural fairness Ramu Aiyar VS A. L. Palaniappa Chetty - Madras.
-
Rule of Perpetuity & Property Transfer - Krishna Murthy's argument on the rule of perpetuity highlights that defeasance clauses do not always violate this rule; the outcome depends on case-specific facts, especially regarding absolute gifts and possession transfer GOVINDAMMA VS SECY. , MUNICIPAL FIRST GRADE COLLEGE, CHINTAMANI - Karnataka.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Krishna Murthy Aiyar is a recurring name in Indian case law, often associated with property disputes, procedural issues, and legal principles regarding tenancy, contracts, and corporate conduct. The cases collectively emphasize the importance of procedural correctness, the legal validity of agreements, and principles governing possession, tenancy, and perpetuity. The judgments reflect a nuanced understanding of statutory provisions, case law, and equitable principles, underscoring Krishna Murthy Aiyar’s significance in Indian legal history.
References:
- 01100019790
- 00300006978
- 00300044157
- 02100068942
- 00200015317
- 00300021101
- 00200025153
- 02100071309
- 00300003703
Search Results for "Krishna Murthy Aiyar"
1982 0 Supreme(Del) 159 • India - Delhi
M.L.JAIN, RAJINDAR SACHAR
While reversing the decision in Krishna Murthy Aiyar v. Krishna murthy Aiyar (supra), the Privy Council, in Krishna Murthy Aiyar v. ... Subram anill, (1889) ILR 12 Madras 490 (12), and Krishna Murthy Aiyar v. Krishnamurthy Aiyar and others, AIR 1925 Madras 932 (13 ). ... Krishnamurthy Aiyar, AIR 1927 PC 179 (14), placed it beyond doubt that whe....
1994 0 Supreme(Kar) 213 • India - Karnataka
S.VENKATARAMAN
Krishna Murthy and Andanappa and others v. Gurunath, as well as the decision in P. N. S. Aiyar v. K. J. Nathan, in support of his contention. ... ( 5 ) SECTION 200, Cr. P.
2019 0 Supreme(Kar) 1258 • India - Karnataka
B.V.NAGARATHNA
Aiyar, (2004) ILR (Kar) 1081 2. Yenugu Krishna Murthy vs. Union of India and Another, (2018) 3 Kar. L.J. 619 30. Sri M.I. ... Narayana Murthy submitted on 08.02.2003, Corporate Governance is about ethical conduct in business.
1909 0 Supreme(Mad) 32 • India - Madras
MILLER, MUNRO
Rangappa 7 M. 365, Krishna v. Vankatasami 8 M. 164, Narasimha Naidu v. Ramasami 14 M.k 44, Apparau v. ... Srinivasa Murthi 2 M.k 80, Samarapuri Mudaliar v. ... The same principle in favour of tenants was affirmed and followed in the case reported in Krishna v. Vankatasami 8 M. 164 It was held; in the decision reported in Narasimha Naidu v. ... Srinivasa Murthi 2 M.k 80 that the second proviso contained in Rule 4 of Section 11 of Act VIII of 1865, applied only to leases, which, in the circumstances in which they were made....
1993 0 Supreme(AP) 53 • India - Andhra Pradesh
M.N.RAO, P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU
Venkataranu aiyar, J (as he then was) speaking for the Division Bench held:"the fact that the deed is void or that it should be set aside does not affed the position, such prayers being ancillary to the substantive prayer for possession.
1958 0 Supreme(Kar) 53 • India - Karnataka
A.R.SOMNATH IYER, IQBAL HUSAIN
Krishna Murthy requires a reference to the relevant provisions of Section 24 of the Act. ... Krishna Murthy has suggested that this argument of Mr. Chandrasekhar should not be accepted for more than one reason. ... Krishna murthy, an incompetent reference thereby rendering the impugned order made by the government on 10-5-1958, liable lo be quashed. ... Krishna Murthy has however very strenuously argued that the reference made by the president under ....
1963 0 Supreme(AP) 140 • India - Andhra Pradesh
A.GOPAL RAO
Krishna Murthy that the agreement in any manner divides (he remuneration which the plaintiff gets for discharging the duties as vettiyan. It has been stated in the agreement, Ex. ... Krishna Murthy the learned Counsel for the appellant that the transaction embodied in the document dated 29-5-1942 is contrary to law and public policy and as such void and is not binding on the plaintiff. He also contended that the suit is not barred by limitation. ... Krishna Murthy that as far as the pa....
1910 0 Supreme(Mad) 416 • India - Madras
AYLING, ARNOLD WHITE
Hussain Sahib I.L.R. (1905) Mad. 87 and Krishna Satapasti v. Sarasvatula Sambasiva Row I.L.R. (1908) Mad. 177. ... Ananta-krishna Ayyar has asked us to accept. So much for the first point, ... 6. ... Dronam Raju Seetharama Murthy I.L.R. (1908) Mad. 163 There, following the principle of the decision of the Full Bench, it was held that a claim under Section 281 was not conclusive against, or in favour of, the judgment-debtor under Section 283 of the Code unless he was a party to the proceedings in
1915 0 Supreme(Mad) 313 • India - Madras
S.AIYAR, NAPIER
Ramaswami Aiyar (1907) I.L.R. 30 Mad. 88 does not differ from the ruling in Krishna Aiyar v. Krishnasami Aiyar (1900) I.L.R. 23 Mad. 597. On the other hand the decision in Subramania Aiyar v. Arumuga Chetty (1903) I.L.R. 26 Mad. 330 is directly in point. Mr. ... We think the decree of the Court below must be modified, as there can be no personal decree against the defendant; Sanka Krishna Murthi v. The Bank of Burma (1912) I.L.R. 35 Mad. 692. ... 5.
1986 0 Supreme(Kar) 74 • India - Karnataka
M.S.NESARGI
Krishna Murthy on the basis of rule of perpetuity being affected. It is clear that the defeasance clause would not always affect the rule of perpetuity. That aspect must depend on facts and circumstances of each case. ... Krishna Murthy argued that by the earlier portion of the recital excerpted above, K. Rajagopaliah Setty made an absolute gift of the property in favour of the College Committee and also handed over possession of the property. ... Krishna Murthy is that perusal of Exhi....
Filter by Legal Phrase
