AI Overview

AI Overview...

References: - Shanti Lal VS State of Madhay Pradesh - Crimes - Pano Devi, W/o Kishundeo Mandal VS State Of Bihar - Patna - Pano Devi, W/o Kishundeo Mandal VS State Of Bihar - Patna - Shantilal VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh - Rakesh Kumar VS State of U. P. - Allahabad - Lokesh Singh @ Sannu VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan

Search Results for "Legal Maximum Punishment for Offenses under Ipc Section 304"

Shanti Lal VS State of Madhay Pradesh

India - Crimes

ALTAMAS KABIR, C.K.THAKKER

18 – Section 18 provides for a minimum fine of rupees one lakh and a minimum imprisonment of ten years with a maximum of twenty ... 18 r/w sections 63 to 70, IPC; section 30, Cr. ... years – These minimum punishments cannot be reduced – Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 30, Cr PC authorizes the Court to ... It appears to us that the punishment of fine is a pecuniary appropriate punishment for all o....

Pano Devi, W/o Kishundeo Mandal VS State Of Bihar

2010 0 Supreme(Pat) 1214 India - Patna

MANDHATA SINGH

) then after expiry of 60 days-Gravity of the offence for submitting the charge-sheet is observed from the side of maximum punishment-In ... the present case, the case falling under Section 304B IPC where maximum sentence prescribed is for life, bail was rightly refused ... Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973-Section 167(2)(a)(i) & 167 (2)(a) (ii) r/w Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 304B Granting bail when ... So, the gravity of the offence for submitti....

Pano Devi, W/o Kishundeo Mandal VS State Of Bihar

2010 0 Supreme(Pat) 1205 India - Patna

MANDHATA SINGH

) then after expiry of 60 days-Gravity of the offence for submitting the charge-sheet is observed from the side of maximum punishment-In ... the present case, the case falling under Section 304B IPC where maximum sentence prescribed is for life, bail was rightly refused ... Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973-Section 167(2)(a)(i) & 167 (2)(a) (ii) r/w Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 304B Granting bail when ... So, the gravity of the offence for submitti....

Shantilal VS State of M. P.

2007 0 Supreme(MP) 1003 India - Madhya Pradesh

C.K.THAKKER, ALTAMAS KABIR

Section 18 quoted above provides penalty for certain offences in relation to opium poppy and opium. ... It is equally true that maximum sentence imposable on the appellant is twenty years. ... The learned counsel for the State again is right in submitting that clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 30, CrPC authorizes ... ... It appears to us that the punishment of fine is a pecuniary appropriate punishment for all offences to which men are prompt....

STATE VS GOVINDSINGH

1960 0 Supreme(MP) 350 India - Madhya Pradesh

S.B.SEN

The court considered the ten months of detention during the trial as sufficient punishment for these offenses. ... Govindsingh was sentenced to three and a half years of rigorous imprisonment under Section 304 (1), but no sentence was imposed for ... The court relied on the principle that where there is an offense, there must be a punishment, as stated in Queen empress v. ... ... ( 2 ) THE non-applicant Govindsingh has been convicted under Section 304#HL_EN....

Rakesh Kumar VS State of U. P.

2016 0 Supreme(All) 3382 India - Allahabad

SURENDRA VIKRAM SINGH RATHORE, ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA-II

under Section 304-B IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. ... Fact of the Case: The case involved the conviction of the appellant for the offense under Section 304-B IPC and Section ... under Section 304-B IPC to seven years rigorous imprisonment, to be served concurrently with the sentence under Section 4 of Dowry ... For the offence Under Sec....

Petitioner VS Respondent

2012 0 Supreme(Mad) 1031 India - Madras

M.M.SUNDRESH

Drunken Driving - Criminal Law - Section 304(ii) IPC - Section 338 IPC - Section 337 IPC - Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act ... The court emphasized the need for appropriate punishment and the principle of proportionality in sentencing for such offenses. ... It also highlighted the need for appropriate punishment and the principle of proportionality in sentencing for such offenses#H....

Enugu Thirupathi Reddy VS State Of A. P.

2003 0 Supreme(AP) 807 India - Andhra Pradesh

M.NARAYANA REDDY

Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 428 – Indian Procedure Code,1860 - Sections 304-B and 306 – Convict ... legally wedded wife of sole accused - Held, Accused is liable to be convicted and sentenced in respect of offence said prescribes maximum ... Finding the sole accused, guilty of the separate offences, and charges, punishable under Section 304-B and section 306,i. P. C. : ii. Consequently, convicting the sole accused, in res....

PRADEEP KUMAR Vs STATE OF KERALA

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 66230 India - High Court of Kerala

MARY JOSEPH, J

He was charged under IPC Section 304 but was convicted under Sections 304(A) and 279. ... Final Decision: Conviction upheld; sentence modified to three months for Section 279 IPC and one year for Section 304(A) IPC ... Negligence - Criminal Law - IPC Section List - This case involved an appeal against conviction under IPC Sections 30....

Lokesh Singh @ Sannu VS State of Rajasthan

2017 0 Supreme(Raj) 633 India - Rajasthan

KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, PRAKASH GUPTA

Section 304-B IPC. ... dowry death under Section 304-B IPC, the court held that the maximum sentence of life imprisonment should be imposed only in the ... Whether the case fell in the category of a "rare case" warranting the maximum sentence of life imprisonment under Section 304-B IPC ... Thus while imposing punishment for an offence under Section 304B #HL_STA....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top