AI Overview

AI Overview...

Limitation for Claiming Maintenance Charges of the Apartment

Analysis and Conclusion

The overarching principle across these sources is that claims for maintenance charges are subject to statutory limitation periods, often ranging from a few years from the date of default or claim initiation. Claims beyond these periods are barred and cannot be legally enforced. Proper adherence to procedural requirements, timely payments, and compliance with statutory provisions are crucial to maintain the validity of maintenance charge claims. Any attempt to recover charges for periods prior to the limitation cutoff or after the prescribed time frame is likely to be invalid or barred by law.

References:
- Goverdhan Nopany VS Bengal Unitech Universal Infrastructure Private Limited - Consumer, RukmaniYamma VS Kirloskar Investment and Finance Ltd. - Consumer, Aruna Kannur, D/o. R. G. Pujar VS State of Karnataka, By Kengeri Police Station, Rep. by Public Prosecutor - Karnataka, Vijayashanthi Builders Ltd. Rep. by its Director, Alwarpet, Chennai VS Lotus Pond Residents Welfare Association Rep. by its President, Kelambakkam, Kancheepuram District - Madras, Neeraj Kumar Gupta VS Panchtatva Promoters (P) Ltd. - Consumer, Shivkumar S/o. Rudra Murthy Vs G.r.grand Residency Apartment Owners Association - Karnataka, Gunish Chawla VS IREO Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. - Consumer, SMV Agencies Pvt. Ltd. VS Jaipuria Sunrise Greens Apartments - Consumer, M/s. B. B. C. Spring Field Flat, Owners’ Association VS Inderchand D. Kochar - Madras, Akhilesh Anand S/o Anand N Kotian vs State Of Karnataka - Karnataka

Search Results for "Limitation for Claiming Maintenance Charges of the Apartment"

Goverdhan Nopany VS Bengal Unitech Universal Infrastructure Private Limited

India - Consumer

V.K.JAIN

charges cannot be demanded and recovered for the period prior to 1.4.2014—Opposite party to not recover the maintenance charges ... , 1986—Complainant booked residential flat with the opposite party namely ‘Unitech Cascades’—Sale consideration for residential apartment ... concerned State Commission—State Commission took did not have pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the complaint—NCDRC hold that the maintenance ... Therefore, to the extent of maintenance charges, t....

RukmaniYamma VS Kirloskar Investment and Finance Ltd.

India - Consumer

P.D.SHENOY, R.K.BATTA

The builder was to develop the property; the builder was to get the plans approved at its cost and charges; in the finalization of ... 10.2.1996, the complaint with reference to the said 4 apartments would only be within the period limitation, but, in respect of ... The complaint is accordingly held to have been filed within the period of limitation. ... repairs and maintenance work. ... OP did not pay maintenance charges for his share of apartments ....

Aruna Kannur, D/o.  R. G.  Pujar VS State of Karnataka, By Kengeri Police Station, Rep.  by Public Prosecutor

2022 0 Supreme(Kar) 400 India - Karnataka

SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

towards common amenities and/or maintenance charges - Whether merely because apartments have been developed by BDA, could apartments ... - Defaulted in Payment of Maintenance Charges - Whether this Court ought to exercise powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and quash ... instead of Station House Officer - Whether Association would be entitled to disconnect electricity supply in event of non-payment of charges ... The Deed of Declaration providing for the Association to....

Vijayashanthi Builders Ltd.  Rep.  by its Director, Alwarpet, Chennai VS Lotus Pond Residents Welfare Association Rep.  by its President, Kelambakkam, Kancheepuram District

2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 1183 India - Madras

N.SATHISH KUMAR

Arbitration - Maintenance Charges - Sec. 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - [Arbitration, Maintenance Charges] - [ ... unpaid maintenance charges and non-provision of promised amenities by the builder. ... The builder contended that they had provided facilities and collected maintenance charges for maintaining common amenities, but the ... Having factually found that the expenditure incurred by the respondent/petitioner herein towards #HL....

Neeraj Kumar Gupta VS Panchtatva Promoters (P) Ltd.

India - Consumer

PREM NARAIN

Thus, this is clearly violation of provision 4(4) of Uttar Pradesh Apartment (Promotion, of Construction, Ownership and Maintenance) Act, 2010 and therefore, the opposite parties be directed not to implement the revised plan. ... Hold that the revised sanction of layout plan dated 02.07.2015 has been obtained by the opposite parties in violation of Section 4(4) of the UP Apartment (Promotion, of Construction, Ownership and Maintenance) Act, 2010 and as such the same is illegal and void; ... b. ... It was argued that Ut....

Shivkumar S/o. Rudra Murthy Vs G.r.grand Residency Apartment Owners Association

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 3449 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH, J

charges. ... maintenance dues were excessive and barred by limitation. ... (Paras 2-10) ... ... (B) Limitation - Claim for maintenance dues from 2018 was contested as barred ... Further GR Apartment Owners Association house Rules for July-2017 at page No.12 reveals the maintenance charges, which states that maintenance invoice can be paid without any fine or penalty till 20th of the month of invoicing. ... The counsel also would v....

Gunish Chawla VS IREO Grace Realtech Pvt.  Ltd.

India - Consumer

V.K.JAIN

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 21(a)(i) – Real Estate – Residential apartment – Buyers Agreement – In spite of having paid ... Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement, timely performance by the applicant of all its obligations under this Agreement, including without limitation, its obligations to make timely payment of the Sale Consideration, maintenance charges and other deposits and amounts, including any interest ... The learned counsel for the OPs submits that the parties having agreed to all th....

M/s.  B. B. C.  Spring Field Flat, Owners’ Association VS Inderchand D. Kochar

2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 972 India - Madras

G. CHANDRASEKHARAN

Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Apartment Ownership Act, 1994 . ... Thus, the learned counsel for defendants 1 to 6 and 13 & 14 submitted that this suit has no merits, the relief asked is unworkable; the suit is barred by limitation and prayed for dismissal of the suit.

Akhilesh Anand S/o Anand N Kotian vs State Of Karnataka

2025 0 Supreme(Kar) 273 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

(A) Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 - Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Registration of Cooperative Society ... of RERA directing such registration - The court held that a RERA committee can order the formation of a Cooperative Society for apartment ... at the proper time and place, the share of the registration charges, municipal taxes, water and electricity charges, maintenance charges, ground rent, and other charges, if any. ... The petit....

SMV Agencies Pvt.  Ltd.  VS Jaipuria Sunrise Greens Apartments

India - Consumer

SUBHASH CHANDRA, J. RAJENDRA

The complaint was also barred by limitation since the maintenance of the project was handed over to the Association on 01.04.2018, while the complaint was filed on 07.01.2021. ... The agreement stipulated monthly maintenance charges payable within 30 days of demand, with a penalty of 18% interest for delays, and allowed recovery from IFMS in case of defaults. ... The OP later proposed transferring only the authority to collect monthly maintenance charges, but withheld IFMS of Rs.2,81,0....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top