Back
SUBHASH CHANDRA, J. RAJENDRA
SMV Agencies Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Jaipuria Sunrise Greens Apartments – Respondent
JUDGMENT
AVM J. Rajendra, AVSM VSM (Retd.), Member—FA No. 376/2022 has been filed by Opposite Parties (Ops) under Section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (“the Act”), challenging the Order dated 18.06.2021 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab (“State Commission”) in CC No. 01 of 2021, wherein the State Commission partly allowed the complaint. FA No. 387 of 2022 has been filed by Ops under Section 58(1)(b) of the Act, 2019 is against the Order dated 02.05.2022 passed by the State Commission in Execution Application No. 158 of 2021, arising from CC No. 01 of 2021 dated 18.06.2021. By the impugned order in EA, the State Commission directed the Judgment Debtors (JDs) to comply with its Order dated 18.06.2021 passed in CC No. 01/2021 and issued Bailable Warrants for a sum of Rs.5,00,000 with one surety of the like amount against the JDs.
2. The main facts and questions of law involved in both the First Appeals, except for specific details, are similar and thus both the Appeals are being disposed of by this common order. Therefore, FA No. 376 of 2022 is being treated as the lead case.
3. For convenience, parties in the present Appeal are being referr
Pecuniary jurisdiction – For the purpose of determining pecuniary jurisdiction under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, only the value of the consideration paid for goods or services should be consid....
Joint Complaint – Need for application of Order I Rule 8 of CPC would be required only in a case involving a complaint under Section 12(1)(c) of 1986 Act – It does not have any application when simil....
Pecuniary Jurisdiction of Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission under CP Act, 2019 is determined solely by the value of consideration paid for goods or services & not by value of goods or services t....
Individuals are permitted to file separate complaints under the Consumer Protection Act without needing to seek permission for class actions.
The jurisdiction of the District Consumer Redressal Commission is determined by the value of goods or services with respect to specific deficiencies claimed, not by the total transaction value.
(1) Liberty to Approach Appropriate Forum – When a complaint is dismissed solely on technical or jurisdictional grounds rather than on the merits of the case, the courts generally protect the consume....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
