AI Overview...
- Mandali Ranganna v. T. Ramachandra (2008) SCC 11, AIR 2008 SC 2291
- Main points: The case involved a dispute over property construction and ownership, with the Supreme Court emphasizing that structures constructed, whether rightly or wrongly, cannot be demolished at that stage. It clarified that disputes over title and construction are distinct, and the Court's intervention is limited once constructions are in place.
- Insights: The judgment highlights judicial restraint in cases of ongoing construction and underscores the importance of legal remedies other than demolition.
-
References: Sanghati Pal VS Prakash Adhuryya - Calcutta, Laxmikanta Sahoo VS Arun Kumar Sahoo - Orissa, Ramnath Rajoriya S/o Late Shri Gopiram Rajoriya VS Maggar Singh Alias Veeta, S/o Shri Guru Dutt - Rajasthan
-
Application in legal context:
- The case is frequently cited in property disputes, especially regarding construction rights, injunctions, and the scope of judicial intervention.
- It has been referenced in cases involving the grant of injunctions, modification of court orders, and property rights, emphasizing that constructions should not be disturbed arbitrarily once made.
-
References: Mandali Ranganna VS M. Ramachandra - Karnataka, Mandali Ranganna VS M. Ramachandra - Current Civil Cases, S. Kothaimalar VS Kalyan @ Kalyanasundaram & Others - Madras, Kishorsinh Ratansinh Jadeja VS Maruti Corp. - Supreme Court
-
Main points from citations:
- The decision is often invoked to justify allowing ongoing construction or to deny demolition orders.
- It is distinguished from family partition cases, where disputes over title are central, unlike the construction dispute in this case.
- The judgment supports the principle of maintaining status quo regarding constructed structures pending final adjudication.
Analysis and Conclusion: The case of Mandali Ranganna v. T. Ramachandra (2008) is a landmark judgment that limits courts' power to demolish structures once constructed, emphasizing that such disputes require careful legal remedies rather than immediate demolition. It is widely cited in property and construction disputes to uphold the stability of structures pending resolution of ownership or title issues.
Search Results for "Mandati Ranganna"
2009 0 Supreme(Cal) 316 • India - Calcutta
S.K.MUKHERJEE, KALIDAS MUKHERJEE
Suman kejriwal and Ors. and AIR 2008 SC 2291, Mandali Ranganna and Ors. etc. v. T. Ramachandra and Ors. Mrs.
2010 0 Supreme(Cal) 1109 • India - Calcutta
PRASENJIT MANDAL
Mitra has referred to the decision of Mandali Ranganna and ors Vs. T.
2023 0 Supreme(Pat) 1425 • India - Patna
ARUN KUMAR JHA
Learned senior counsel relies on a decision in the case of Mandati Ranganna vs. ... The reliance of learned senior counsel on the decision in the case of Mandati Ranganna vs. T Ramachandra reported in (2008) 11 SCC is misplaced since it was a case for partition in family and there was no dispute over title.
2008 0 Supreme(SC) 740 • India - Supreme Court
V.S.SIRPURKAR, S.B.SINHA
| Shekhar Harish Rekha ... | (Def. 3) (Def.4) (Def.5) ... ___________________________________________________________ ... | | | | ... Mandali
2010 0 Supreme(Kar) 543 • India - Karnataka
V.JAGANNATHAN
Aggrieved by the appeals of the defendants being allowed, the plaintiffs approached the Apex Court in SLP Nos. 10928 and 10929 of 2007 (later changed to Civil Appeal Nos. 3128 and 3129 of 2008 (Mandali Ranganna and Others v T. Ramachandra and Others1 2008(5) Kar.
• India - Current Civil Cases
V.JAGANNATHAN
Aggrieved by the appeals of the defendants being allowed, the plaintiffs approached the Apex Court in SLP Nos. 10928 and 10929 of 2007 (later changed to Civil Appeal Nos. 3128 and 3129 of 2008 Mandali Ranganna and Others v T. Ramachandra and Others, 2008(5) Kar.
2019 0 Supreme(Ori) 187 • India - Orissa
A.K.RATH
. - Mandali Ranganna and others vs. T. Ramachandra and others, (2008) AIR(SCW) 3817 - M/s. Graftek Pvt. Ltd. and others vs. ... In Mandali Ranganna and others etc., construction was made. The Apex Court held that rightly or wrongly constructions have come up. They cannot be directed to be demolished at that stage. ... He placed reliance on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Mandali Ranganna and others, etc. vs. T. Ramachandra and others, (2008) AIR(SCW) 3817 and this Court ....
2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 641 • India - Rajasthan
INDERJEET SINGH
Ranganna & Ors. ... In support of his contention, counsel relied upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Mandali Ranganna & Ors. Vs. T. Ramachandra & Ors. reported in (2008) 11 SCC 1 wherein para 26 & 27 has held as under:- ... “23. ... it just and proper to modify the order dated 19.09.2017 passed by learned trial Court only to the extent that the appellant is allowed to complete the remaining finishing work pending at first floor of the disputed property in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Suprem....
2009 0 Supreme(Mad) 458 • India - Madras
M.JEYAPAUL
S.Chellappan (AIR 2000 SC 3032) - MANDALI RANGANNA v. ... The learned counsel appearing for the 6th respondent and the 7th defendant cited a decision of the Supreme Court in MANDALI RANGANNA v.
2009 3 Supreme 337 • India - Supreme Court
CYRIAC JOSEPH, ALTAMAS KABIR
Ranjit Kumar also referred to the decision of this Court in Mandali Ranganna & others vs. T. Ramachandra1 [(2008) 11 SCC 1] wherein an additional principle was sought to be enunciated relating to grant of injunction by way of an equitable relief.
Filter by Legal Phrase
