AI Overview...
-
Manoj Suryavanshi - Mentioned in multiple cases and contexts, including criminal proceedings and legal judgments. He was involved in a case where he engaged in conversation with the police after his arrest, as per witness testimony. Specifically, on 12.2.2011, he was contacted via phone, claiming to be present at his house Manoj Suryavanshi VS State of Chhattisgarh - Supreme Court.
-
Legal Proceedings and Judgments - The Supreme Court of India referenced Manoj Suryavanshi in the context of a 2020 case (Manoj Suryavanshi v. State of Chhattisgarh, SCC 2020 4) that dealt with issues of mental or emotional disturbance affecting criminal liability. The court emphasized the importance of psychiatric evaluation in sentencing and mitigating circumstances Deyyala Suryanarayana Suribabu VS State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh, State Of Maharashtra VS Digambar - Bombay, State of West Bengal VS Md. Raees Qureshi @ Hadi Qureshi - Crimes.
-
Crime and Investigation - In a case involving the murder of Vijay Suryavanshi, evidence from witnesses like PW-7 was considered, although he was not an eye-witness but provided information about the incident BHUNESHWAR PRASAD @ MITHUN GUPTA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Chhattisgarh.
-
Personal and Family Matters - In a case related to elopement, it was alleged that Sumrit Bai, wife of accused Manoj, eloped with Shivnath Dhiver. Manoj, along with others, searched for them in Chandigarh but failed to trace them State of Chhattisgarh VS Manoj Suryavanshi - Chhattisgarh, State of Chhattisgarh v. Manoj Suryavanshi - Chhattisgarh.
-
Education - Manoj Kumar Jindal, possibly unrelated to the criminal context, appeared in B. Com. Final Year Examination in 1985, with details about revaluation procedures MANOJ KUMAR JINDAL VS RAVISHANKAR UNIVERSITY, RAIPUR - Madhya Pradesh.
Analysis and Conclusion: Manoj Suryavanshi appears predominantly in legal contexts involving criminal investigations, court judgments, and issues of mental health in sentencing. His involvement ranges from direct engagement with police during investigations to being referenced in Supreme Court rulings concerning mental disturbance and criminal liability. Additionally, he is connected to family disputes and personal matters, such as elopement cases. The references highlight his presence across various legal and social facets, with significant judicial attention given to his case in the context of mental health considerations in criminal law.
References: - Manoj Suryavanshi VS State of Chhattisgarh - Supreme Court - Deyyala Suryanarayana Suribabu VS State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh - State Of Maharashtra VS Digambar - Bombay - State of West Bengal VS Md. Raees Qureshi @ Hadi Qureshi - Crimes - BHUNESHWAR PRASAD @ MITHUN GUPTA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Chhattisgarh - State of Chhattisgarh v. Manoj Suryavanshi - Chhattisgarh - MANOJ KUMAR JINDAL VS RAVISHANKAR UNIVERSITY, RAIPUR - Madhya Pradesh
Search Results for "Manoj Suryavanshi"
2020 8 Supreme 336 • India - Supreme Court
UDAY UMESH LALIT, INDIRA BANERJEE, M.R.SHAH
He has specifically stated in the crossexamination that he engaged the accused Manoj in conversation and thereafter the police came and took Manoj after arresting him. ... However, thereafter, he could be contacted on mobile when RameshwarP.W.11 phoned the accused Manoj on 12.2.2011 at about 11.00 p.m. As per the said witness, at about 11.00 p.m. he phoned the accused Manoj and asked him “Where are you” and the accused told that he is present in his house. ... From the evidence on record, it appears that the concerned wi....
2013 0 Supreme(Chh) 229 • India - Chhattisgarh
YATINDRA SINGH, PRITINKER DIWAKER
house of Shivlal Dhiver alleged that as wife of accused namely Sumrit Bai eloped with younger brother of the complainant accused Manoj ... It is alleged that as wife of the accused namely Sumrit Bai eloped with younger brother of the complainant namely Shivnath Dhiver, accused Manoj, complainant Shivlal and Rameshwar (P.W. 11) went to Chandigarh in their search but they could not trace them and returned to their village.
2021 0 Supreme(AP) 359 • India - Andhra Pradesh
A.V.SESHA SAI, J.UMA DEVI
(7) Manoj Suryavanshi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, (2020) 4 SCC 451. 8. ... In Manoj Suryavanshi’s case (11 supra), the Hon’ble Supreme Court held at paragraph No.18 as follows: "16.
2021 0 Supreme(Bom) 1673 • India - Bombay
V.K.JADHAV, SHRIKANT D.KULKARNI
Manoj Suryavanshi v. State of Chhattisgarh, reported in (2020) 4 SCC 451." 16. ... In Manoj Suryavanshi v. State of Chhattisgarh (supra) relied upon by learned counsel for the appellant, the Supreme Court has dealt with the issue in the facts of said case that the offence was committed under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance.
1988 0 Supreme(MP) 85 • India - Madhya Pradesh
C.P.SEN, Y.B.SURYAVANSHI
SURYAVANSHI, J. ... ( 1 ) THE petitioner who has passed B. ... No. 2) second 827 durga College, Raipur. 97496 manoj Kumar Jindal (Petitioner)third 820 - do- (II) The petitioner as per rules, applied for re-valuation within prescribed limit of 30 days. The Answer-books were revalued. ... ... ( 2 ) (I) It is common ground that the petitioner Manoj Kumar Jindal, a student of Ravishankar University appeared in B. Com. Final Year Examination in 1985, with Roll No. 97495.
• India - Crimes
JOYMALYA BAGCHI, BIVAS PATTANAYAK
In Manoj Suryavanshi vs. ... Emphasizing the psychiatric and psychological evaluation of the appellant to determine the mitigating circumstances the Apex Court in Manoj and Others vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 677 issued guidelines with regard to manner of collection of evidence in pre-sentencing herein.
2024 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 2153 • India - High Court of Chhattisgarh
Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal, Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, JJ
38) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The appeals arise from a judgment convicting five accused for the murder of Vijay Suryavanshi ... (2) PW-7 Nanku Suryavanshi has not seen the incident and is not an eye-witness as such and he has only informed about the incident to PW-6 Sharad Laskar, PW-9 Manoj Patkar, PW-10 Pawan Suryavanshi and PW-14 Sarwan Suryavanshi who had reached the spot. ... Yet, the Trial Court has relied upon the evidence of PW-7 Nanku Suryavanshi that he has informed....
2014 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 76 • India - Chattisgarh High Court
Yatindra Singh, C. J., *Pritinker Diwaker, J.
It is alleged that as wife of the accused namely Sumrit Bai eloped with younger brother of the complainant namely Shivnath Dhiver, accused Manoj, complainant Shivlal and Rameshwar (P.W. 11) went to Chandigarh in their search but they could not trace them and returned to their village.
• India - Principal Bench Chhattisgarh
• India - Supreme Court
No(s). 8682/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08/08/2013 in CRLA No. 550/2013 passed by the High Court Of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur) MANOJ SURYAVANSHI
Filter by Legal Phrase
