SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 341

UDAY UMESH LALIT, INDIRA BANERJEE, M.R.SHAH
Manoj Suryavanshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocate
For the Respondent(s):Pranav Sachdeva, Jatin Bhardwaj, Neha Rathi, Sudesh Kumar Singh, Advocates

JUDGMENT

M. R. Shah, J.

Leave granted.

2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 08.08.2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No. 550 of 2013 and Criminal Reference No. 05 of 2013, by which the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the appellant­original accused and has confirmed the judgment and order of conviction and death sentence awarded by the learned Trial Court for the offences punishable under Section 302 of the IPC for having killed the three minor children of the complainant Shivlal – P.W.18 and also for the offences punishable under Section 364 of the IPC, the original accused has preferred the present appeal.

3. As per the case of the prosecution, at 7.00 AM on 11.02.2011, two sons of one Shivlal­original complainant – Vijay aged about 8 years, Ajay aged about 6 years and Kumari Sakshi aged about 4 years left their home in Darripara to attend the school at Karaihapara and reached the school. On the school getting over at 11.30 AM, the


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top