AI Overview...
-
Illicit Connection - Refers to an inappropriate or forbidden relationship, often involving extramarital affairs or relationships that are socially or legally considered improper. It is frequently discussed in legal contexts such as accusations of adultery, illicit intimacy, or unauthorized relationships, which can impact matrimonial disputes, custody cases, or criminal proceedings. For example, allegations of illicit connection with a husband's mistress or a third party are examined in various cases, affecting judgments related to cruelty, divorce, or detention under laws targeting illicit activities Shaik Riayazun Bee VS State of A. P. rep by P. P High Court of A. P, Hyderabad - Andhra Pradesh, Mirchumal VS Devi Bai - Rajasthan, POTHI GOLLARI VS GHANNI MONDAL - Orissa.
-
Meaning in Legal Context - The term often implies a relationship that contravenes social or legal norms, such as extramarital affairs or illicit intimacy, which can be grounds for criminal or civil action. Courts have interpreted illicit connection as involving acts like sexual intercourse outside marriage or relationships that are deemed morally or legally unacceptable, sometimes requiring explicit explanation by judges to juries to clarify its significance Shaik Riayazun Bee VS State of A. P. rep by P. P High Court of A. P, Hyderabad - Andhra Pradesh, ASWINI KUMAR ROY VS STATE - Calcutta.
-
Related Legal Provisions - The concept is linked to laws addressing cruelty, adultery, and illicit traffic (e.g., narcotics), where establishing an illicit connection can be crucial for legal judgments. For instance, laws under the Indian Penal Code and Narcotic Acts define and penalize acts related to illicit traffic and relationships, impacting detention orders and criminal proceedings Sant Lal Rahi VS State of Bihar - Crimes, Sapt Lal Rai VS State Of Bihar - Patna.
-
Implications in Cases - Allegations of illicit connection can influence custody disputes, accusations of cruelty, or criminal charges. Evidence such as witness testimony or medical reports may be used to establish the existence of such relationships, which can have significant legal consequences, including detention or divorce POTHI GOLLARI VS GHANNI MONDAL - Orissa, KANCHAN MOHANTY VS KULAMANI MOHANTY - Orissa.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Illicit connection generally signifies a forbidden or socially unacceptable relationship, often involving extramarital affairs or unauthorized intimacy. Its interpretation varies depending on the legal context but typically involves relationships that breach moral, social, or legal standards. Courts consider evidence of such connections seriously, as they can affect judgments related to cruelty, custody, or criminal liability. Understanding its legal implications is essential for comprehending cases involving accusations of illicit relationships and their consequences Shaik Riayazun Bee VS State of A. P. rep by P. P High Court of A. P, Hyderabad - Andhra Pradesh, ASWINI KUMAR ROY VS STATE - Calcutta, Mirchumal VS Devi Bai - Rajasthan.
References:
- Shaik Riayazun Bee VS State of A. P. rep by P. P High Court of A. P, Hyderabad - Andhra Pradesh
- Besai Venkata Ramana Murthy VS State - Andhra Pradesh
- ASWINI KUMAR ROY VS STATE - Calcutta
- Mirchumal VS Devi Bai - Rajasthan
- Shamas-ud-din Lone @ Sabha VS U. T. of J&K - Jammu and Kashmir
- POTHI GOLLARI VS GHANNI MONDAL - Orissa
- Sant Lal Rahi VS State of Bihar - Crimes
- Sapt Lal Rai VS State Of Bihar - Patna
- KANCHAN MOHANTY VS KULAMANI MOHANTY - Orissa
- SUBHASHITHAN S vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala
Search Results for "Meaning of Illicit Connection"
2016 0 Supreme(AP) 181 • India - Andhra Pradesh
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
connection with husband of the complainant i.e. ... 323 and 506 – Cruelty – Sought for quash of Proceedings – Allegations against her were only to effect that she allegedly had an illicit ... For this reason and also for the reason that no allegations of cruelty falling within the meaning of Section 498A IPC and the allegations ... State of NCT of Delhi [AIR 2010 SC 2712] the Apex Court engaged with the question whether the foster sister who is allegedly having illicit connection with the husband of the....
2002 0 Supreme(AP) 1475 • India - Andhra Pradesh
T.CH.SURYA RAO
of - No whisper in entire evidence of wife about any harassment or curelty meted out to her by accused/husband in connection with ... nbsp;“Cruelty” as envisaged ... u/S.498-A - Meaning ... INDIAN PENAL CODE,Sec.498-A - Accused/husband convicted for offence of illicit intimacy with another woman depriving matrimonial ... He used to insist PW-1 to take divorce and beat her in that connection and further harassed to bring more money from her parents towards dowry. ... There has been no whisper in the entire evidence of P....
1954 0 Supreme(Cal) 107 • India - Calcutta
J.P.MITTER, SEN GUPTA
The court also found that the trial judge had failed to properly explain to the jury the meaning of "forced or seduced to illicit ... Whether the trial judge had failed to properly explain to the jury the meaning of "forced or seduced to illicit intercourse" in the ... The court held that the trial judge had failed to properly explain to the jury the meaning of "forced or seduced to illicit intercourse ... There he only explained the ordinary meaning of "forced or sed....
1976 0 Supreme(Raj) 146 • India - Rajasthan
MODI
In this connection, the learned District Judge dealt with the question whether respondents going from Ajmer to join service at Anand was unjust and without reasonable cause, and can this be treated as leaving the society of her husband without reasonable excuse within the meaning of sec. 9 of the Act ... It was also urged by the respondent that the appellant was having illegitimate connections with one Mst. Sundari. The respondent protested against the illicit intimacy with Mst. Sundari, but her husband did not pay any h....
2022 0 Supreme(J&K) 122 • India - Jammu and Kashmir
M. A. CHOWDHARY
The said provision provides that a detention order can be made by the Government or any specially empowered officer of the Government of a particular rank with a view to prevent a person from committing any of the acts within the meaning of “illicit traffic” as defined in clause (c) of Section 2 of the ... It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the Detaining Authority could not have passed an order of detention on the ground of commission of acts within the meaning of the Act of 1988. ... of Illicit#HL_....
1962 0 Supreme(Ori) 67 • India - Orissa
R.K.DASH
W. 2 and some other villagers to prove the illicit connection of the accused with P. W. 2. P. W. 2 herself has deposed that the accused committed sexual intercourse with her. According to P. W. 6 the Sarpanch and P. ... It was further observed that the words "on behalf" of the husband cannot be said to be without any meaning. ... He also held that after such abandonment of Kamli by her husband, the complainant cannot be said to have taken care of her daughter on behalf of her husband within the meaning of Section 199, Cr....
• India - Crimes
B.N.AGARWAL, BINODANAND SINGH
Constitution of India 1950 - Article 22(5)Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Ordinance, ... and purchase of narcotic drugs which are some of acts within the meaning of 'illicit traffic' as defined under Section 2(e) of the Ordinance. ... been filed for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus after quashing the order of detention passed on 7th of July, 1988 by the Joint Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (hereinafter referred to as 'the Joint Secretary') und....
1989 0 Supreme(Pat) 142 • India - Patna
B.N.AGRAWAL, B.N.SINGH
PREVENTION OF ILLICIT TRAFFIC IN NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ORDINANCE, 1988 - SEC.3(I) - CUSTOMS ACT, 1962 - SEC ... .135 of the Customs Act, 1962 and while in jail, an order of detention was passed against them under Sec.3(I) of the Prevention of Illicit ... and purchase of narcotic drugs which are some of acts within the meaning of "illicit traffic" as defined under Sec.2(C) of the Ordinance. ... has been filed for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus after quashing the order of detention passed on 7th o....
1991 0 Supreme(Ori) 41 • India - Orissa
P.C.MISRA
(meaning the husband) on 5-5-1988, her illicit pregnancy was detected and she was taken to the doctor to be examined and it was found that she had conceived since 4 1/2 months. ... The essential allegation against her was that she had illicit connection with one Laxman Sahoo of village Bahali. But curiously enough the said Laxman Sahoo was not impleaded as a party as required under Rule 5 of Hindu Marriage and Divorce Rules, 1956. ... Paragraphs 7 and 8 of the application read as follows :-"para-7: That she (me....
2008 Supreme(Online)(KER) 1638 • India - High Court of Kerala
P.R.RAMAN, V.K.MOHANAN, JJ
Going by the C.D. it can be seen that even according to certain witnesses, 5th respondent was residing in the house of the petitioner and there was ample opportunity for the detenue and the 5th respondent for their illicit connection. ... In the light of the facts and circumstances, we feel that there is no meaning in keeping the file pending in this Court but the same can be disposed of with certain directions to the respondents 2 to 4 . ... According to their investigation it is revealed that 5th respondent was a frequent visitor in the....
Filter by Legal Phrase
