AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Jurisdiction for Money Recovery in Goods Supply - Delhi
    Multiple cases establish that Delhi courts have jurisdiction to hear suits for recovery of money when goods are supplied or transactions are linked to Delhi. For instance, in INDDEL00000009064, the court upheld Delhi's jurisdiction based on the claim for dues from goods supplied since 2012-13, asserting that the transaction's nexus with Delhi sufficed M/S JAINSONS LIGHTS (PVT) LTD Vs ASHRAF - Delhi. Similarly, in the case involving Scheme-II, Okhla Industrial Area, the suit was filed in Delhi due to the location of the scheme and the supply activities Hanil Era Textiles LTD. VS Puromatic Filters (P) LTD. - Supreme Court.

  • Supply of Goods and Contract Formation
    When goods are supplied under a bill or invoice, it is generally considered a written contract, establishing a clear basis for suit. This principle is reinforced by Delhi High Court rulings, such as in AIR 1992 DELHI 1 and AIR 1992 DELHI 1, where supply through bills on agreed terms was deemed sufficient to constitute a contractual obligation for recovery VINOD KUMAR VS KESHAV ANAND - Delhi, VINOD KUMAR VS KESHAV ANAND - Dishonour Of Cheque.

  • Civil and Criminal Proceedings
    The filing of criminal complaints for recovery alongside civil suits is permissible, but the civil suit's primary role is to establish the debt's existence, while criminal proceedings focus on dishonest intent or misappropriation. In one case, a pending civil suit did not bar criminal proceedings for recovery, provided the civil suit was for the same amount and related to the same transaction V. S. Sasidharan VS Nand Kishore Parihar - Punjab and Haryana.

  • Territorial Jurisdiction and Supply Location
    The place of supply and the location where goods were delivered or invoices issued influence jurisdiction. For example, in the Delhi case, the court noted that although the cause of action might have arisen at Jaipur, the suit was filed in Delhi due to the supply and transaction links BELA GOYAL PROPRIETOR OF ISPAT SANGRAH (INDIA) vs VIIPL - MIPL JV (JAIPUR) & ORS. - Delhi.

  • Legal Framework and Procedure
    Suit for recovery of money based on bills or invoices is governed by Order 37 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, which presumes a written contract when goods are supplied under agreed terms. This facilitates summary procedures for recovery, as established in multiple Delhi cases VINOD KUMAR VS KESHAV ANAND - Delhi, VINOD KUMAR VS KESHAV ANAND - Dishonour Of Cheque.

Analysis and Conclusion:
Delhi courts recognize jurisdiction for recovery of money when goods are supplied and linked to Delhi through the place of supply, invoicing, or contractual nexus. Goods supplied under recognized contractual terms constitute a valid basis for civil suits under Order 37, and criminal proceedings can proceed concurrently if dishonest intent is involved. Therefore, in cases of goods supplied to Delhi, recovery actions are typically maintainable within Delhi courts, provided the transaction's nexus with Delhi is established.

References:
- INDDEL00000009064
- 00100008737
- 02100023326
- 02700019246
- IND_Delhi_2022_DHC_000058
- 02300044591
- 01100007088
- 00600001394

Search Results for "No Recovery of Money at Delhi when the Goods Supplied"

M/S JAINSONS LIGHTS (PVT) LTD Vs ASHRAF

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 31346 India - High Court of Delhi

MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

of dues from goods supplied since 2012-13, claiming jurisdiction in Delhi. ... (A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 96 - Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Section 39 - Appeal against dismissal of money recovery ... suit - Appellant claimed Rs. 3,08,343/- for goods supplied, asserting jurisdiction in Delhi due to business transactions - Respondent ... This appeal brought under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure assails the ju....

Hanil Era Textiles LTD.  VS Puromatic Filters (P) LTD.

2004 3 Supreme 287 India - Supreme Court

S.RAJENDRA BABU, G.P.MATHUR

Civil Procedure Code, 1908-Section 20 and Order VII Rule 10-Territorial jurisdiction-Suit for recovery ... in Bombay and an advance payment was made at Bombay-Defendant sent CT-3 Form to plaintiff in Delhi and goods were then dispatched ... Scheme-II, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-II, New Delhi, accordingly filed Suit No. 162 of 1997 in the Court of District Judge, Delhi, for recovery of Rs. 3,93,344.80 and pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 24 per cent per annum from the ....

Sankar Sealing Systems VS Jain Motor Trading Co.

2003 0 Supreme(Mad) 1328 India - Madras

R.BANUMATHI

filed suit for recovery of Rs.13,41,165.75 based on goods sold and supplied. ... Arbitration Clause - Recovery of Money - Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Section 8 Fact of the Case: Plaintiff ... Plaintiff's claim of money for recovery of Rs.13,41,165.75 is based on the Goods /Gaskets sold and supplied at Delhi Defendants' principal office and at their various branches of Jodhpur, Ludhiana etc. ... The #HL_STAR....

Laxmi Cotton Co. And Ors.  VS Punjab National Bank And Ors.

1992 0 Supreme(MP) 154 India - Madhya Pradesh

V.S.KOKJE

Whether simultaneous criminal complaints and civil suits are filed for recovery of money for the goods supplied but the main aspect ... to be proved in civil suit would be whether the goods were supplied by the plaintiffs to the defendants, its value and whether the ... Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., AIR 1988 SC 2118, and the Delhi High Court in Star Paper Mills Ltd. v. ... Whether simultaneous criminal complaints and civil suits are filed for recovery of ....

BELA GOYAL PROPRIETOR OF ISPAT SANGRAH (INDIA) vs VIIPL - MIPL JV (JAIPUR) & ORS.

India - Delhi High Court

for goods supplied. ... Fact of the Case: The plaintiff, a vendor, filed a suit against the defendants, a joint venture, for recovery of money ... arose at Delhi. 2. ... for recovery. ... It is submitted by the learned senior counsel for the defendants the entire cause of action arose at Jaipur; the goods were supplied at Jaipur; payments were to be made at Jaipur and the invoices raised by the plaintiff also notes ... Thus the crux of the....

V. S.  Sasidharan VS Nand Kishore Parihar

1998 0 Supreme(P&H) 1245 India - Punjab and Haryana

N.K.AGRAWAL

Whether the criminal complaint was maintainable in view of the pendency of a civil suit for the recovery of the same amount? 2. ... The only question which would arise for determination is whether the petitioner-accused has withheld the money with any dishonest ... intention and had misappropriated the sale proceeds of the goods. ... It was also noticed that the suppliers had instituted a civil suit for the recovery of money against the buyers, which was pending in Delhi High Court. ......

R.G. Overseas vs Adroit Trading Nuts Pvt. Ltd.

India - Delhi High Court

PRATHIBA M.SINGH

suit for recovery based on a previous suit filed in Amritsar claiming full settlement. ... of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 10 - Consolidation of suits - The Court addressed the issue of whether a subsequent suit for recovery ... regarding the outstanding amount and did not warrant a stay; comprehensive adjudication was necessary in the subsequently filed Delhi ... The question as to whether Adroit, in the Delhi suit, is entitled to recovery can only be adjudicated in the Delhi suit ....

S.  Kumar Synfabs Ltd.  VS Bombay Saree Centre

2000 0 Supreme(P&H) 245 India - Punjab and Haryana

M.L.SINGHAL

Civil Revision - Recovery of Debt - Companies Act, 1908 - Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure - [Companies Act, 1908, Order ... Kumar Synfabs Company Limited filed a suit for the recovery of Rs. 12,69,591/- with future interest at the rate of 12 per cent per ... Samrat Bicycle Ltd., AIR 1992 Delhi 1 that "when the goods are supplied through a bill on certain terms and conditions duly agreed to between the parties, there is no escape from the conclusion that it amounts to a written contract between t....

VINOD KUMAR VS KESHAV ANAND

2001 0 Supreme(Del) 1768 India - Delhi

A.K.SIKRI, J.D.KAPOOR

AIR 1992 DELHI 1 wherein it was held that when the goods are supplied through a bill on certain terms and conditions duly agreed to between the parties, there is no escape from the conclusion that it amounts to a written contract between the parties and suit by plaintiff to recover money for price of ... goods sold and delivered is covered by cl. (2) (b) of Order 37 Rule 1 which applies to suit for recovery of debt or liquidated amount in money payab....

VINOD KUMAR VS KESHAV ANAND

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

A.K.SIKRI, J.D.KAPOOR

AIR 1992 DELHI 1 wherein it was held that when the goods are supplied through a bill on certain terms and conditions duly agreed to between the parties, there is no escape from the conclusion that it amounts to a written contract between the parties and suit by plaintiff to recover money for price of ... goods sold and delivered is covered by cl. (2) (b) of Order 37 Rule 1 which applies to suit for recovery of debt or liquidated amount in money payab....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top