AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively illustrate that Nodal Agencies serve as pivotal entities in various legal and administrative contexts, including financial transactions, distribution mechanisms, enforcement, and infrastructure regulation. Their role is primarily procedural and facilitative, with their actions subject to judicial oversight, constitutional validity, and procedural correctness. The phrase Not Label for Make Payment suggests a misconception; Nodal Agencies are not merely labels but active agents responsible for executing specific functions, including payments, coordination, and enforcement, within their statutory mandates.

Search Results for "Nodal Agency Not Label for Make Payment"

ITC Ltd.  VS State of Andhra Pradesh

2021 0 Supreme(Telangana) 381 India - Telangana

M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, T.AMARNATH GOUD

The petitioner was asked to deposit Rs.4.5 Crores by the Nodal Agency, APIIC, and the petitioner did deposit the said amount through a cheque No.066843 drawn on Standard Chartered Bank dt.29.05.2007 through its letter dt.31.05.2007 in favour of APIIC. ... Another consequence of the bifurcation of the composite State of Andhra Pradesh was that the APIIC, which was acting as a Nodal Agency in the combined State of Andhra Pradesh prior to the Act coming into effect, was also bifurcated into TSIIC and APIIC. ... The petition....

Lomash Pharmaceuticals through its sole Prop.  Smt.  Vandana Sharma VS State of H. P.

2015 0 Supreme(HP) 784 India - Himachal Pradesh

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN

Court and held that the rule of exclusion of writ jurisdiction by availability of an alternative remedy is a rule of discretion and not ... emphasized that the rule of exclusion of writ jurisdiction by availability of an alternative remedy is a rule of discretion and not ... available to an aggrieved party and an arbitration clause in an agreement between the parties cannot ipso facto render a writ petition “not ... The nodal agency i.e. Respondent No.3 was thereafter directed to initiate action in the ....

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER vs M/S.THE THANJAVUR DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD

India - Madurai Bench of Madras High Court

The impugned provision is not ultra vires the Constitution of India. ... The impugned provision is a machinery provision and not a charging provision. ... ... ... (iii) The impugned provision is not contrary to the constitutional mandate and liable to struck down. ... The Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation that was appointed as a nodal agency for distribution of the cash support was to coordinate with the Cooperative Societies for the distribution. 91. ... (MD)Nos.33 of 2021 etc. batch ....

Khadi And Village Industries VS Khadi Design Council of India

2023 0 Supreme(Del) 894 India - Delhi

C. HARI SHANKAR

marks was not a permitted use under the Trade Marks Act. ... The Court also found that the defendants' use of the marks was not a permitted use under the Trade Marks Act. ... The Court also found that the defendants' use of the marks was not a permitted use under the Trade Marks Act. ... The plaintiff also claimed to be the Nodal Agency for implementation of the PMEGP at the national level, under which financial assistance is provided to new enterprises. ... The plaintiff claims to be the nod....

Rupesh Radhakisan Chaudhari VS State Of Maharashtra

2020 0 Supreme(Bom) 901 India - Bombay

RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, B.U.DEBADWAR

Handcuffing alone does not invalidate discovery if corroborated. ... The same principle was applied without further elaboration on entitlement to payment of interest of an owner. ... What is really important is the credibility of the evidence of the investigating agency about getting information/statement regarding the information from the accused. ... It is not the case of the appellant that the investigating agency has imported blood group A and sprinkled it at the place where the offence was committe....

Rupesh Radhakisan Chaudhari VS State of Maharashtra

2020 0 Supreme(Bom) 1332 India - Bombay

RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, B.U.DEBADWAR

The same principle was applied without further elaboration on entitlement to payment of interest of an owner. ... What is really important is the credibility of the evidence of the investigating agency about getting information/statement regarding the information from the accused. ... It is not the case of the appellant that the investigating agency has imported blood group A and sprinkled it at the place where the offence was committed or on the clothes and the body of the victim and on the clothes and the knife produce....

Surinder Singh @ Shinda VS Union Territory, Chandigarh

2020 0 Supreme(P&H) 492 India - Punjab and Haryana

ANIL KSHETARPAL

The trial court charged the appellants for various alleged offences, and both the appellants pleaded not guilty. ... In default of payment of fine, to further under imprisonment of same kind for 10 days. ... In default of payment of fine, to further under imprisonment of same kind for 30 days. ... In default of payment of fine, to further under imprisonment of same kind for 30 days. ... In default of payment of fine, to further under imprisonment of same kind for 10 days. ... Still furth....

Sahebro Kaluram Bhintade VS State of Maharashtra (At the instance of DCB, CID, UNIT (III)

2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 1711 India - Bombay

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, SWAPNA JOSHI

However, it is not necessary to conclusively answer this issue since it does not arise in this case. ... Hence, submission that PW-2-Neelkanth Bane did not bring any threat perception of deceased on record is not decisive here. ... only for CULA which occurred in past, if the organized crime is not proved. ... It also held that NIA Act does not put any restriction on the investigating agency to investigate or further investigate and permits new agency#HL_END....

Tadas Wind Energy Private Limited vs Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL)

2025 Supreme(Online)(CERC) 115 India - Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

Shri Jishnu Barua, CJ, Shri Ramesh Babu V., J, Shri Harish Dudani, J

... (B) Jurisdiction - The matter of intra-State transmission networks falls under the jurisdiction of the State Commission, not ... The open access applicant may file a Petition before the Commission within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of order from the nodal agency, namely SLDC.” ... o) Respondent No.2, NLDC is the nodal agency under Paragraph 4.1 of the Detailed Procedure under the NOAR Regulations, 2008, and does have a role to play in the facts of the present matter, although ....

Rameshwar VS State of Haryana

2018 3 Supreme 569 India - Supreme Court

UDAY UMESH LALIT, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

in unjust enrichment to developers – Fraud on power – Proper course would be to sustain acquisition and vest the land in State agency ... on the date when it was supposed to be pronounced i.e. on 26.08.2007 – At the same time, interest of those landholders who had not ... notification issued on 27.08.2004 – Section 6 declaration issued on 25.08.2005 – Developers purchasing land after section 4 notification – Not ... In the remaining cases, payment of compensation could be directed through payment of con....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top