AI Overview...
- Not Submitting of Documents - Rejection of Tender Due to Incomplete or Missing Documents
- Several cases highlight that failure to submit required documents leads to tender rejection. For instance, in Edward Kramsa VS Karbianglong Autonomous Council represented by the Principal Secretary, KAAC, Diphu - Gauhati, tenders were rejected because the bidders did not submit necessary documents like the LRCC. Similarly, in SASI ROAD FINISHERS AND ENGINEERING vs THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER - Madras, the bid was rejected because the petitioner failed to enclose the WCC as stipulated in tender conditions.
- Submission of Documents but Not Filled or Properly Completed
- In K.BALAKRISHNAN Vs DIRECTOR GENERAL - Kerala, the rejection was upheld because the petitioner’s submitted document was not duly filled or signed, making the tender invalid. The case in ANAND TRANSPORT, MYLAPORE, CHENNAI VS KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED, BANGALORE - Karnataka emphasizes that tender documents must conform strictly to the terms; failure to do so can justify rejection.
- Tender Conditions and Mandatory Documentation
- Tender conditions often specify mandatory documents such as earnest money deposit, technical bids, or specific certificates. Non-compliance or incomplete submission results in rejection (Karmarinandini Fishery Cooperative Society Ltd. VS State of Assam - Gauhati, HCIL-HCLL (JV) VS UNION OF INDIA - Allahabad). The courts consistently uphold the principle that non-submission or improper submission of required documents justifies rejection, as seen in A. R. Enterprises (M/s) VS State of Arunachal Pradesh - Gauhati.
- Legal and Procedural Validity of Rejection
- Courts generally support the rejection of tenders when documents are not submitted or are improperly filled, provided the process adheres to tender conditions (Edward Kramsa VS Karbianglong Autonomous Council represented by the Principal Secretary, KAAC, Diphu - Gauhati, SASI ROAD FINISHERS AND ENGINEERING vs THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER - Madras, ANAND TRANSPORT, MYLAPORE, CHENNAI VS KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED, BANGALORE - Karnataka). Rejection based on non-compliance with document submission requirements is considered lawful unless procedural irregularities are proven.
- Summary and Conclusion
- Not submitting required documents or submitting incomplete/incorrectly filled documents constitutes valid grounds for rejection of tenders. Courts uphold the importance of strict adherence to tender conditions, emphasizing that failure to provide mandatory documentation invalidates the bid. Petitions challenging such rejections are typically dismissed unless procedural violations are evident (Edward Kramsa VS Karbianglong Autonomous Council represented by the Principal Secretary, KAAC, Diphu - Gauhati, SASI ROAD FINISHERS AND ENGINEERING vs THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER - Madras, ANAND TRANSPORT, MYLAPORE, CHENNAI VS KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED, BANGALORE - Karnataka, A. R. Enterprises (M/s) VS State of Arunachal Pradesh - Gauhati).
Search Results for "Not Submitting of Documents Amounts to Rejection of Tender Petitioner has Submitted but Not Filled"
2020 0 Supreme(Guj) 198 • India - Gujarat
HARSHA DEVANI, SANGEETA K.VISHEN
Since the petitioner company was interested as well as eligible, it filled in the tender form and submitted the same along with tender ... The estimated cost of the tender with tender fee was not refundable. ... It is the case of the petitioner that bid was submitted within time. The preliminary bids and technical bids were to be opened. ... Earnest money deposit of Rs.6,08,950/- was to be paid by the bidder along ....
2009 0 Supreme(Bom) 1421 • India - Bombay
A.M.KHANWILKAR, R.G.KETKAR
Government Contract-Tender-Writ of mandamus-Delay and laches-Tender process-Petitioners allowing tender process to progress further-If ... the Court permits challenges to be raised belatedly, it would amount to petitioners taking chance in the matters and permitting ... It is submitted that it is patently absurd and dishonest attempt on the part of the petitioner to explain away as to how they obtained copies of the confidential documents#H....
2013 0 Supreme(Gau) 440 • India - Gauhati
B.K.SHARMA
was created - On other hand in the Audit report of petitioner there is mention of irregularities committed by it in not submitting ... Writ Petition - Tender - Bid value - Tender for settlement - Petitioner, a registered fishery cooperative ... in notice, tenders were to be submitted on or before 8.4.2013 upto 2 PM. ... He also submitted that there being no requirement of submitting neighborhood certificate, as per....
2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 1368 • India - High Court of Madras
Honourable Dr Justice ANITA SUMANTH
The petitioner challenged the rejection of its bid. ... Final Decision: The writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the rejection of its bid was dismissed. ... The tender conditions clearly stated that the bid would be rejected if the WCC was not submitted, and the petitioner's bid was rightly ... In the meantime, the petitioner had, on 17.03.2024, submitted its bid without enclosing the WCC. ... The #H....
1996 0 Supreme(Del) 671 • India - Delhi
C.M.NAYAR
to tender — Petitioner filed writ for setting aside the decision to award contract in favor of respondent No. 2 and for acceptance ... Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14 and 226 — Arbitrariness in accepting the tender — Respondent No. 1 invited tenders — Petitioner ... lowest bidder but not awarded contract for not fulfillling the terms of the invitation to tender — Contract awarded to respondent ... The argument was that if t....
2015 0 Supreme(Gau) 335 • India - Gauhati
B.K.SHARMA
tenders, as they did not submit the required documents. ... The court found that the petitioners' tenders were defective and upheld the rejection of their tenders, as they did not submit the ... required documents. ... When it was found that the tender submitted by the petitioner involved in the said proceeding did not accompany with the LRCC, the writ petition ....
2016 0 Supreme(Gau) 731 • India - Gauhati
MANOJIT BHUYAN
tender documents via on-line was fixed upto Interested bidders were also required to submit hard copies as supportive documents ... , namely, for Lower Subansiri District, Kurung Kumey District and Upper Subansiri District of Arunachal Pradesh – Last date for submitting ... Circular had been uploaded in the official website nor a print copy thereof has been brought on record – Grievance raised that the petitioner ... The last date for submitting tender docum....
2004 0 Supreme(Kar) 682 • India - Karnataka
K.L.MANJUNATH
Therefore, the Court is of the opinion that if the tender documents submitted by the petitioner was not in conformity with the terms ... Manjunath, J]: Petitioner while submitting the document should have been very careful and cautious, petitioner who has failed to ... Rejection of tender ... TENDERS - Rejection of tender -No need of holding .....
2013 0 Supreme(All) 2496 • India - Allahabad
V.K.SHUKLA, SUNEET KUMAR
was not submitted by the Joint Venture Firm, as ought to had been submitted—In such situation, rejection of tender document, as ... Pre-qualification Bid by the authority concerned as per the terms and conditions of tender document, not arbitrary—Petitioner failed ... Tender—Rejection of—Earnest money deposit—Joint Venture firm—Once a party participating with the status of Joint ....
2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 173 • India - High Court of Kerala
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
Issues: Whether the rejection of the tender was illegal as the petitioner had digitally signed the document. ... The petitioner's agreement was not duly filled and signed, and therefore, the rejection of the tender was not illegal. ... TENDER - REJECTION - PRELIMINARY AGREEMENT - [Clause 1.6 of Ext.P1] - The bidder shall submit certain documents offline in a separate ... A perus....
Filter by Legal Phrase
