AI Overview

AI Overview...

Notional Promotion in Higher Judicial Service Denied

Analysis and Conclusion
Courts have consistently held that long-standing ad hoc or notional promotions, made under proper eligibility criteria, should be recognized as regular promotions with full seniority and benefits. Denial of such benefits constitutes a violation of fundamental rights to fair treatment and promotion. Rules or circulars that retroactively deny recognition or benefits are often struck down if they conflict with constitutional principles or judicial precedents. Therefore, individuals who have been granted notional promotions are entitled to regularization and associated service benefits, including monetary claims, even if the promotion was not initially formalized.

Search Results for "Notional Promotion in Higher Judicial Service Denied"

Harish Pal Singh, Mohd. Shamim Khan, K.K. Tyagi, T.R. Meena, M.A. Khan, Sher Singh, William Parashar, Ajay Gupta, S.A. Khan, Raj Shekhar, Gauri Shankar vs NDMC

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 12241 India - Central Administrative Tribunal

Ranjit More, Chairman, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)

procedural delays - Fundamental rights regarding fair treatment and promotion must be upheld - Judicial precedents uphold that service ... and Regularization - Long-standing ad hoc promotions, if made under eligibility criteria, cannot be denied regular status despite ... to Executive Engineer (Civil) - Contended that long service of 15-20 years should qualify them for regularization and further promotions ... Denial of regularization effectively denied#HL_E....

C.L.SISSAMMA Vs THE STATE OF KERALA

2010 Supreme(Online)(KER) 32606 India - High Court of Kerala

C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ

Fact of the Case: The writ appellant, an Assistant Teacher, was granted notional promotion in 2001 but was denied a ... time-bound grade upon completing eight years of service due to a government circular stating that notional promotion periods would ... Issues: Whether the notional retrospective promotion period can be considered qualifying service for subsequent time-bound ... According to her, due promotion w....

C.  JAYACHANDRAN VS STATE OF KERALA

2020 3 Supreme 260 India - Supreme Court

UDAY UMESH LALIT, HEMANT GUPTA

Judicial Service. ... (Para 26, 39) (b) Kerala State Higher Judicial Services Special Rules, 1961 - Rule 6(2) - Seniority - division ... (a) Service law - Notional seniority - A candidate wrongfully not appointed - Entitled to notional seniority ... Judicial Service. ... The facts leading rise to the present appeals are that an advertisement was published on 16th April, 2007 to fill up six posts in the Kerala #HL_S....

Sujata Kohli VS Registrar General, High Court of Delhi

2020 0 Supreme(SC) 330 India - Supreme Court

A.M.KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI

Judicial Service, seeking to challenge the constitutional validity of Rule 27 of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1970 and ... (a) Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1970 - Rule 27 - Validity challenged contending it is ultra vires ... (Para 16) (c) Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1970 - Rule 27 r/w Full court resolutions - no-norms position ... (C) No. 3157 of 2015, whereby the Hi....

ACCOUNTANT GENERAL AE KERALA vs PHILIP M T

2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 45356 India - High Court of Kerala

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ, A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J

Promotion - Service Benefits - KSR Rule 23(a) - The court discussed the applicability of the 'no work, no pay' principle regarding ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner challenged the denial of monetary benefits for service periods before his promotion ... benefits retroactively, aligning with the judicial principle of 'no work, no pay'. ... Government never indicated that the pay and allowances will be refixed from the date of notional promotion. They have only give....

John. K. Illikkadan, S/o.  Kuruvila VS State of Kerala, Represented By The Chief Secretary To The Government of Kerala

2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 566 India - Kerala

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, ANIL K.NARENDRAN

States Reorganization Act, 1956- Section 115(7) - The Kerala State Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1961- ... It can only be done by the Full Court or the Court exercising judicial functions; which essentially is the power of the State as ... Statement of facts: The essential comity ideally required within a common service, identified ... the Kerala Higher Judicial Service with effect from the date on which he assumes charge” (sic). ... Judges of High....

PREMKALA SINGH HJS VS HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

2017 0 Supreme(All) 770 India - Allahabad

A.P.SAHI, RAJAN ROY

Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975—Rules 22(1), 22(2), 25, 26, 5, 6, 8, 18, 20 and 21—Seniority—H.J.S. ... —Promotion—Occurrence of vacancies—Prescription of a suitability test as an eligibility condition with retrospective effect from ... 21.3.2002 also creates a bar to such claim, as, all vacancies against which petitioners could have been considered for promotion ... would get an opportunity to get promotion to the Higher Judicial Servi....

Bharat Bhushan VS High Court of Madhya Pradesh

2015 0 Supreme(MP) 1159 India - Madhya Pradesh

A.M.KHANWILKAR, K.K.TRIVEDI

Judicial Service. ... the Rules of 1994 governing the recruitment in the Higher Judicial Service, specifically focusing on the method of appointment, ... Fact of the Case: The petitioners sought to set aside the final results of the Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Service ... Judicial Service with all the consequential benefits. ... The Rules governing the recruitment in the Higher Judi....

PRABHUJI VS STATE OF U. P.

2010 0 Supreme(All) 4330 India - Allahabad

DEVI PRASAD SINGH, ARUN TANDON

Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975—Rules 20, 22, 23 and 26—Higher Judicial Service—Seniority and promotion—Dispute between promotee ... recruits—Mode of determination of seniority—Petitioners selected for posts of Munsif Magistrates on 29.8.1978 and became eligible for promotion ... upto May, 1994 has been extended seniority on basis of length of service under unamended Rules and have been placed en block—Thus ... of the officers o....

State of A. P.  VS K. V. L. Narasimha Rao

1999 4 Supreme 176 India - Supreme Court

S.N.PHUKAN, S.RAJENDRA BABU

Service Law-Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service-Notional pro­mo­tion-Claim for monetary benefit on account of-Appellants Munsif ... are effected all benefits flowing therefrom, including monetary benefits, must be extended to an officer who has been denied promotion ... Andhra Pra­desh consequent to State Reorganisation-Respondents given notional promotion, with effect from date of their juniors being ... -The respondents herein were in the #HL_STA....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top