AI Overview...
Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited (OMC) - Summary
-
Operations Suspension & Illegal Mining Concerns
The Supreme Court and relevant authorities have ordered the immediate suspension of mining operations, including transportation of already mined iron ore, in leases held by Obulapuram Mining Company (OMC) due to illegal activities and encroachments. The Central Empowered Committee recommended halting activities in encroached areas and imposed restrictions on mining in districts like Bellary to curb illegal mining Government of Andhra Pradesh VS Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited - Supreme Court, Government Of Andhra Pradesh VS Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited - Supreme Court, Govt. of A. P. VS Obulapuram Minig. Co. P. Ltd. - Supreme Court. -
Legal Proceedings & Lease Validity
OMC's lease deeds, originally granted for specific periods (e.g., 20 years), are under scrutiny. Courts have examined lease durations, investments made by the company, and the validity of extensions. The company’s lease was initially granted to ancestors of current stakeholders, including grandsons, with some leases allegedly continuing beyond their stipulated periods due to investments and possession rights Tapal Timmappa & Sons, a partnership firm VS State of A. P. rep. By its Secretary, Department of Industries & Commerce - Andhra Pradesh, TAPAL TIMMAPPA AND SONS, BELLARY VS STATE OF A. P. - Andhra Pradesh. -
Regulatory & Environmental Compliance
The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, and Mineral Concession Rules, 1960, have been invoked to regulate lease boundaries and production limits. The authorities have fixed ground boundaries for leases and prescribed production ceilings (e.g., in Bellary district) to prevent over-extraction and illegal activities. The boundaries of OMC's leases are being aligned with ground realities State of Andhra Pradesh VS Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited - Supreme Court. -
Illegal Mining & Investigation
Investigations, including CBI inquiries authorized by government notifications, have linked OMC to illegal mining activities, omissions, and commissions that may constitute criminal offences. The company’s activities have been scrutinized under various laws, with allegations of encroachment, illegal extraction, and violations of mineral and environmental laws Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi VS Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd. - Andhra Pradesh. -
Judicial Oversight & Court Judgments
The Supreme Court has reinforced the need to curb illegal mining, emphasizing the importance of proper lease management, boundary demarcation, and adherence to legal procedures. Past judgments, such as in Jaycee Housing Private Limited case, support the Court’s jurisdiction to oversee such matters and ensure lawful mining practices Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd VS R. K. Mining Private Limited - Andhra Pradesh.
Analysis and Conclusion
Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited has been embroiled in legal and regulatory challenges primarily related to illegal mining, lease violations, and encroachments. The authorities have ordered suspension of its operations and investigations into its activities, highlighting concerns over environmental compliance, illegal extraction, and lease validity. The company’s historical investments and lease arrangements are under judicial review, with courts emphasizing strict enforcement of mining laws and conservation regulations. Overall, OMC's operations are currently under significant legal scrutiny aimed at curbing illegal mining and ensuring lawful resource management.
References:
- Government of Andhra Pradesh VS Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited - Supreme Court, State of Andhra Pradesh VS Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited - Supreme Court, Government Of Andhra Pradesh VS Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited - Supreme Court, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) VS Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited - Karnataka, Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi VS Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd. - Andhra Pradesh, Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd VS R. K. Mining Private Limited - Andhra Pradesh, Tapal Timmappa & Sons, a partnership firm VS State of A. P. rep. By its Secretary, Department of Industries & Commerce - Andhra Pradesh, TAPAL TIMMAPPA AND SONS, BELLARY VS STATE OF A. P. - Andhra Pradesh, Director, Central Bureau Of Investigation, New Delhi VS Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd. - Andhra Pradesh, Govt. of A. P. VS Obulapuram Minig. Co. P. Ltd. - Supreme Court
Search Results for "Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited"
2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1516 • India - Supreme Court
S. H. KAPADIA, AFTAB ALAM, K. S. P. RADHAKRISHNAN
operations in the cases of fifteen mining lease holders be suspended with immediate effect to which the response – Held, Mining ... Constitution of India,1950 - Committed to curb the menace of illegal mining - Interim order - Applications ... /intervention filed by lessees/sub-lessees are taken on record - Central Empowered Committee in its Report has recommended that mining ... Ramesh (9) VSL Mining #HL_....
2012 0 Supreme(SC) 294 • India - Supreme Court
S. H. KAPADIA, AFTAB ALAM, SWATANTER KUMAR
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Boundaries of mining leases - Production of iron ore - Findings of Joint ... leases should accordingly be fixed on ground - Ceiling of million metric tones for total production of iron ore from all mining ... leases in District Bellary may be prescribed - Ceiling of for production of iron ore from all mining leases in District together ... The boundaries of the mining leases should accordi....
2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1412 • India - Supreme Court
S. H. KAPADIA, AFTAB ALAM, K. S. P. RADHAKRISHNAN
operations undertaken Mining Company shall immediately stand suspended which will also include transportation of already mined iron ... area of that lessee concerned - Word "encroachment" will be understood to cover mining pits, overburden dumps, construction of roads ... in encroached area then lessee shall forthwith stop all mining operations not only in encroached area but in entire leased demarcated ... Compa....
2023 0 Supreme(Kar) 115 • India - Karnataka
K. SOMASHEKAR, UMESH M ADIGA
1908 - Section 11 - Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 300 - Assessment Year - Mining ... Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited, 54. ... Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. ... Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd., Ennoble House, No.6....
2010 0 Supreme(AP) 1250 • India - Andhra Pradesh
NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
by the Respondent Company- Writ petition filed by the Respondent company on the ground that the Supreme Court has been hearing the ... Notification No.228/61/2009-AVD-II, dated 1-12-2009:- Centre notification authorizing CBI to conduct an investigation into illegal mining ... On the material collected the respondent company indulged into several omissions and commissions which may constitute an offence ... Obulap....
2023 0 Supreme(AP) 1439 • India - Andhra Pradesh
D. V. S. S. SOMAYAJULU, DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA
The conclusions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Jaycee Housing Private limited case (5 supra) in para 10 and 11 also supports ... limited and Others v. ... Courts Act and the jurisdiction, learned counsel relies upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Jaycee Housing Private
2007 0 Supreme(AP) 846 • India - Andhra Pradesh
G.ROHINI
) - Lease deed - Period of lease - Collector - Petitioner is the grand son of the original leasee – who was initially granted a mining ... the said order a lease deed 16-5-1957 was executed in favour for a period, having invested huge amounts, made the area fit for mining ... Accordingly, though the lease granted in favour of expired he continued in possession of the leased area and was carrying on mining ... Obulapuram #H....
2007 0 Supreme(AP) 848 • India - Andhra Pradesh
G.ROHINI
Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 – Rule 59 (1) (a) and (ii) – Notification – Mining lease deed – Challenged ... – Petitioner is grand son of original lessee - Tapal Thimmappa -who was initially granted a mining lease for iron ore over an area ... deed as executed in favour of Tapal Thimmappa for a period of 20 years who, having invested huge amounts, made the area fit for mining ... Obulapuram Mining #HL_ST....
2010 0 Supreme(AP) 1255 • India - Andhra Pradesh
N.A.KAKRU, VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
activities and other related offences of Mining Company Private Limited and Bellary Iron Ore Private Limited in the Bellary Reserve ... Obulapuram Mining Company - Central Government extended the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Police Establishment ... Section 6 - Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act....
2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1250 • India - Supreme Court
S. H. KAPADIA, AFTAB ALAM, SWATANTER KUMAR
mining - These complaints were made against third party, namely Mining Syndicate for encroaching into mining lease area - Even complaint ... by no steps were taken to prevent that third party from resorting to massive illegal mining in mining lease till this Court banned ... for respective parties on Report submitted by Central Empowered Committee regarding E-auction and related issues pertaining to #HL_S....
Filter by Legal Phrase
