AI Overview...
-
Pay Claims and Employment Disputes - Employers are liable to pay wages and bonuses owed to employees, even if the employee leaves or is discharged before taking leave. Such claims are often based on awards by Industrial Courts rather than contracts or statutes. For instance, a case involved Rs. 110/-P. M. wages owed for four months, which the employer was required to pay. MANAGER HINDUSTHAN JOURNALS, PRIVATE LIMITED VS GOVIND RAM SAWAL RAM - Madhya Pradesh
-
Land Acquisition Compensation and Interest - Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, interest on compensation amounts continues to accrue until paid or deposited into court. The liability to pay interest persists until the owner or interested party receives the amount, with interest being payable from the date of deposit into court. Appellants have filed execution applications to recover outstanding balances with interest. IVO AGNELO SANTIMANO FERNANDES VS GOVERNMENT OF GOA - Uttarakhand, Ivo Agnelo Santimano Fernandes VS Government of Goa - Supreme Court
-
Recovery of Money and Limitation - Claims for recovery of money, such as land compensation or other dues, are subject to limitation periods. If payments are made after the limitation period, the payer cannot claim a refund. Courts have quashed claims or demands that are time-barred, emphasizing the importance of timely filing. First National Bank Ltd. (In Liqn. ) VS Seth Sant Lal - Punjab and Haryana
-
Property and Possession Claims - Courts have affirmed the entitlement to recover possession of property, with conditions such as paying balance dues or producing sale deeds. The recovery process may involve conditions and legal remedies, but possession can be decreed when justified. Dhuri Sah VS Kishun Prasad Sah - Patna
-
Suit for Dues and Limitation - Suits for recovery of dues, such as in pawn or loan cases, are governed by limitation laws. Sale of pawn or property does not reset the limitation period, and claims must be initiated within prescribed time frames. HARIDAS MUNDRA VS NATIONAL AND GRINDLAYS BANK LTD. - Calcutta
-
Adverse Possession and Land Rights - Adverse possession involves occupying land in a manner inconsistent with the owner’s title, potentially extinguishing the original owner’s rights. However, licensees cannot claim adverse possession, and applicable laws like the Easement Act restrict such claims. BRIJ GOPAL BINNANI (SINCE DECEASED) VS RUKMINI DEVI - Allahabad
Analysis and Conclusion:
Claims for recovery—whether wages, land compensation, or property—are primarily governed by statutory provisions and limitation periods. Employers and claimants must act within specified time frames to ensure their rights are enforceable. The courts emphasize the importance of timely filing and proper legal procedures, especially in cases involving land acquisition, employment dues, or possession disputes. Claims that are barred by limitation are typically dismissed, underscoring the need for prompt action in recovery cases.
References:
- MANAGER HINDUSTHAN JOURNALS, PRIVATE LIMITED VS GOVIND RAM SAWAL RAM - Madhya Pradesh
- IVO AGNELO SANTIMANO FERNANDES VS GOVERNMENT OF GOA - Uttarakhand, Ivo Agnelo Santimano Fernandes VS Government of Goa - Supreme Court
- First National Bank Ltd. (In Liqn. ) VS Seth Sant Lal - Punjab and Haryana
- Dhuri Sah VS Kishun Prasad Sah - Patna
- HARIDAS MUNDRA VS NATIONAL AND GRINDLAYS BANK LTD. - Calcutta
- BRIJ GOPAL BINNANI (SINCE DECEASED) VS RUKMINI DEVI - Allahabad
Search Results for "Pay Ana Recover Claim Cases"
1961 0 Supreme(MP) 100 • India - Madhya Pradesh
V.R.NEWASKAR, H.R.KRISHNAN
discharged before he has been allowed the leave, or if he quits his employment before he has been allowed the leave, the employer shall pay ... In the first and the last cases, the claim was for bonus, given rot by contract nor by direct operation of statute, but by an award of an Industrial Court in its decision of a dispute referred to it under the Industrial Disputes Act. ... The employer was liable to pay the wages which were Rs. 110/-P. M. At the relevant point of time four months pay was outstandi....
2011 0 Supreme(UK) 113 • India - Uttarakhand
G.S.SINGHVI, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
(A) Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Secs. 28, 31, 34, 23(1), 11, 54 — Payment of interest — Liability to pay interest on the amount of ... continues to subsist until it is paid to the owner or interested person or deposited into Court u/s 34 r/w 31 — But liability to pay ... on the date on which the deposit into Court is made with the amount of compensation so deposited — Even if the State does try to pay ... The appellants filed an execution application (No. 3/98) for the recovery of the balance amount along with interest ....
2011 0 Supreme(SC) 221 • India - Supreme Court
G.S.SINGHVI, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
compensation to claimants directly, and same is not collected, State cannot then keep the money with itself and utilize it-In such cases ... , 1894-Sections 28 and 34-Acquisition of land-Compensation-Even if State does pay ... 1-Land Acquisition Act, 1894-Section 53-Liability to pay ... The Appellants filed an execution application (No. 3/98) for the recovery of the balance amount along with interest accrued thereon. ... Conceicao Antonieta Santimano could not claim the amount and she had bequeathed her....
2002 0 Supreme(Bom) 850 • India - Bombay
S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Finally, the execution application was filed by Ivo Agnelo Santimano Fernandes, Herbert Santimano Fernandes for recovery of the balance amount along with interest accrued thereon. ... This interpretation is totally unsustainable as the same would result in a chaotic situation inasmuch as every claimant could directly accept the same and thereafter make a claim after few years that the State was liable to pay the amount as the same was not deposited. ... Therefore, the contention of the learned Counsel is that once the State Government pre....
1964 0 Supreme(AP) 130 • India - Andhra Pradesh
NARASIMHAM, P.CHANDRA REDDY
In this case, the consideration for the family settlement was the plaintiff giving up his claim to his father's one-fifth share in ... escape payment of court fee on the market value of the promissory notes in question on the ground that when he filed suits for the recovery ... This is not a case where he is seeking to recover the promissory notes which stand in his name ; nor is it one similar to Venkata Rao v. Sesharattamma, where the basis of the claim was that he was the real payee. ... But he cannot be called upon t....
1973 0 Supreme(Del) 229 • India - Delhi
Final Decision: The court quashed the impugned demand for Rs. 92,363. 00 and the direction to the Pay and Accounts Officer ... letter, duly assessed and quantified in accordance with law and then enforce recovery and payment of the amount adjudged to be due ... 18 and 18a of the General Terms and Conditions governing the contract did not confer a right on the purchaser to adjudicate its claim ... "such sum", he said, meant the claim as assessed by the purchaser so that under this clause the purchaser was entitled to #HL....
1958 0 Supreme(P&H) 88 • India - Punjab and Haryana
TEK CHAND
recovery of the money due on the first call made on 15-10-1948, would have become barred by limitation under Article 112 of the ... for the recovery of the money due on the first call made on 15-10-1948, would have become barred by limitation under Article 112 ... Issues: Whether the claim is within time. ... In case he pays the amount after the expiration of the period of limitation, he cannot, after having paid his debt, claim to be entitled to recover it back, on the ground, that the time barred deb....
1964 0 Supreme(Pat) 110 • India - Patna
K.AHMAD
The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to recover possession of the house, but that he was liable to pay the balance of the ... Whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover possession of the house and mesne profits? 4. ... It decreed the suit subject to the condition that the plaintiff would be entitled to get the custody of the sale deed and recover ... Act," ... but there is no observation made to the effect that any other remedy by way of defence or as a condition precedent to the claim mad....
1962 0 Supreme(Cal) 171 • India - Calcutta
C.N.LAIK, R.S.BACHAWAT
On July 1, 1959 the defendant instituted suit No. 858 of 1959 against the plaintiff for the recovery of its dues and obtained leave ... Nor does the sale of the pawn destroy this right; the pawnor is still liable on the original promise to pay the balance due. The sale does not give a fresh starting point of limitation for a suit to recover the balance. See ILR 24 All 251 and Yellappa v. Desayappa, ILR 30 Bom 218. ... Lala Mukti Prahash Nandi, 22 Cal WN 297 at 301: (AIR 1918 Cal 947 at 949), to the effect that the section gives the pawnee....
2007 0 Supreme(All) 2070 • India - Allahabad
SUNIL AMBWANI
“Adverse possession is that form of possession or occupancy of land which is inconsistent with the title of any person to whom the land rightfully belongs and tends to extinguish that person’s title, which provides that no person shall make an entry or distress, or bring an action to recover ... Section 60 of the Easement Act does not at all apply to such cases.” ... He submits that the licensee cannot claim adverse possession. Shri Goel has relied upon the judgment in (1) Ramsewak and others v. Smt. ... any land or rent, but within twelv....
Filter by Legal Phrase
