SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 64529

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice R.SAKTHIVEL
KAMALA – Appellant
Versus
AYYASAMY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Feeling aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated December 12, 2018 passed in O.S. No.20 of 2017 by the 'IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Bhavani' ['Trial Court' for brevity], the defendant therein has filed this Appeal Suit under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rules 1 and 2 of 'the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ' ['CPC' for short].

2. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the parties will be referred to as per their array in the Original Suit.

PLAINTIFF’S CASE

3. The Suit Properties together form a house site of a total extent of 1183 sq. ft., and absolutely belongs to defendant. On January 29, 2014, vide registered Sale Agreement dated January 29 2014, the defendant agreed to sell the Suit Properties to the plaintiff for a sale consideration of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only), and on the same day itself, the defendant received a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) as advance. As per the terms of Sale Agreement, plaintiff has to pay the balance sale consideration within four years from the date of execution of Sale Agreement and get the Sale Deed executed in his favour by the defendant. The time for specific performance was not conside

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top