The third source clarifies that adverse possession cannot be used as a sword (to claim ownership outright) but can be invoked as a shield (a defense against eviction or possession claims) in legal proceedings VISHABHAI LAKHABHAI BHARVAD V/s LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED MALABHAI BHUDRBHAI BHARVAD - Gujarat.
Legal Principles and Court Interpretations:
Courts have distinguished between using adverse possession as a means to establish ownership (sword) versus a defense to contest claims (shield). The latter is permissible, while the former is generally not recognized as a legal title VISHABHAI LAKHABHAI BHARVAD V/s LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED MALABHAI BHUDRBHAI BHARVAD - Gujarat.
Relevant Legal Context:
Analysis and Conclusion: Adverse possession can be effectively used as a shield in legal disputes to defend possession rights but cannot serve as a sword to establish ownership outright. Courts recognize its utility as a defense mechanism rather than a means to acquire title directly.
He has invited my attention to the affidavit which has been filed by Mr.Ramakant Vishwanath Biradar, Assistant Commissioner, Sward in which it has been pointed out that no objection certificate was submitted from landlord for the additional area to be used, additional power to be used and additional ... This proof of possession was enough and a fresh no objection certificate from the owner is not manifested by law as a condition for renewal of licence. In any event, the petitioners have pointed out that the Authorities w....
capital punishment and 20 accused for life imprisonment case – Criminal appeal under section 391 of Code is concerned reliance is pleased ... For details, please go through the paper cutting attached here with. ... Section 161 deals with the adverse party's rights as to the production, inspection and cross-examination when a document is used to refresh the memory of the witness. ... This was a case where a conclusion adverse to the accused was drawn by the High Court to reverse the acquittal. ... [AIR ....
Thirdly he would submit that learned Trial Court has rejected the compromise on the ground that the plaintiff cannot asked for relief on the basis of adverse possession as it cannot be used as sward but it can be used as a shield means the adverse possession should be taken as defense in the matter. ... Thirdly, the plaintiff has claimed two oxymoron reliefs; one by declaring himself as owner and another by declaring him as owner by adverse #HL_START....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.