AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively affirm that the government or statutory authorities have the explicit power to dismiss a Chief Engineer if misconduct related to financial irregularities or moral turpitude is established through proper disciplinary procedures. However, such dismissals are subject to judicial review to ensure fairness, adherence to due process, and substantiation of charges. Therefore, Poration has the authority to dismiss a Chief Engineer for misconduct involving money received, provided the action complies with procedural safeguards and legal standards.

Search Results for "Poration has the Authority to Dimiss the Chief Engineer do a Misconduct Related to Money Received"

K. R. Erry VS State Of Punjab Through Chief Secretary To Govt. Punjab

1966 0 Supreme(P&H) 213 India - Punjab and Haryana

D.K.MAHAJAN, MEHAR SINGH, I.D.DUA

E., Chief Engineer, Bhakra Canals, and was approved by Shri R. K. Gupta, I. S. ... In 1957, the report of the High Powered Commission was received by the Government in which it was observed that damage to the Ghaggar ... E., Chief Engineer, who held charge of Director, Central Designs, in addition to his duties. ... Handa, the Chief Engineer, and Shri R.K. Gupta. ... of three Chief Engineers. ... E., Chief #HL_STAR....

GURBACHAN SINGH SAWHNEY VS UNION OF INDIA

2002 0 Supreme(Del) 840 India - Delhi

A.K.SIKRI, H.R.MALHOTRA

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the charge-sheet was issued by an appropriate authority based on prima facie materials ... The petitioner was charge-sheeted for grave misconduct and unauthorized absence, leading to a departmental proceeding. ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the petitioner's misconduct was fully proved, and his actions indicated ... Khanna, Chief Engineer, who was later on promoted and became the appellate authority. ... ( 6 ) AS regards the first....

JEYAPRASAD S D vs GOVERNMENT OF KERALA

2012 Supreme(Online)(KER) 38775 India - High Court of Kerala

ANTONY DOMINIC, J

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the government has the authority to remove officials shown to be involved in misconduct ... Rules and the implications of moral turpitude as per the Water and Air Acts, leading to the dismissal based on the petitioner's misconduct ... concluding that even the annulment of the censure did not restore the petitioner's position since the removal was based on valid misconduct ... by the statutory authority. ... by him before the passing of the bribe money#HL_E....

LALLAN KUMAR VS COAL INDIA LTD.

2012 0 Supreme(All) 78 India - Allahabad

S.K.SINGH, PANKAJ NAQVI

awarded to Superintendent Engineer—Charge of misconduct—Charges against him found to be vague, misconceived by Enquiry Officer—Disciplinary ... of appellate authority dismissed—Matter be attended by the Appellate Authority when presented by either side. ... the appellate authority possessed with wide power to test the decision of the disciplinary authority in the light of the comments ... , approved in his own hand writings and even it has been approved by the Chief #....

N. Sivakumaran VS State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Secretary to Government & Others

2008 0 Supreme(Mad) 3346 India - Madras

S.MANIKUMAR

The Court emphasized the importance of providing brief reasons in the order affirming the views of the disciplinary authority. ... Issues: The main issue was whether the appellate authority disposed of the statutory appeal with reference to Rule 23 of the ... Final Decision: The impugned order of punishment was set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the appellate authority ... As the charges related to question of moral turpitude, the disciplinary authority dismissed the petitioner from servic....

Managobinda Mohapatra VS State of Odisha

2020 0 Supreme(Ori) 86 India - Orissa

S.K.SAHOO

Whether the appellant forged the money receipts Exts.12 and 13 and committed the offence of forgery? 4. ... Whether the appellant was entrusted with Rs.6,000/- or had any dominion over such money in the capacity of a Clerk? 2. ... Whether the money was used in violation of any direction for which it had been credited to the P.L. account of Jaleswar N.A.C.? ... the reports were received. ... Similarly P.W.12 has also stated that he received Rs.1,200/-from the appellant and passed a receipt Ext.12 giving ....

DAMODAR SHANTARAM NADKARNI VS S. E. SUKHTANKAR

1973 0 Supreme(Bom) 40 India - Bombay

R.M.KANTAWALA, V.D.TULZAPURKAR

the authority to dismiss the petitioner. ... the authority to dismiss the petitioner. ... the authority to dismiss the petitioner. ... In this case the replies of the Chief Engineer were received upon the answers given by the witnesses in the enquiry. ... Undertaking, Section 74 provides for appointment of City Engineer, executive health officer and hydraulic engineer. Section 76A provides for app....

Life Insurance Corporation of India VS M. L. Dalmia

1972 0 Supreme(Cal) 26 India - Calcutta

RAMENDRA MOHAN DATTA

The court found that the claim arose out of the contract and was related to damages claimed for breach of contract. ... respondent under category 'B' was not outside the scope of the arbitration clause because it arose out of the contract and was related ... Whether the arbitrator was guilty of legal misconduct in arriving at the compensation without any evidence? 4. ... That being the position, in my opinion, the arbitrator was not guilty of any misconduct and the points made out by Mr. Basu cannot be accepted and the s....

Arvind Kumar VS C. B. I.

2022 0 Supreme(Del) 1225 India - Delhi

ANU MALHOTRA

Power of police to seize property during investigation is restricted to assets with direct links to the alleged crime - Seizure related ... Assets alleged to be disproportionate must be linked to known sources of income - Seizure and freezing of assets justified as they relate ... No. 3927/2017) whilst functioning as Chief Engineer in the Indian Railways, Government of India, during the period 1.1.2001 to 19.12.2008 acquired assets in the name of his wife Indu Kumar, accused No.2 (director of the petitioner of Crl.M.C. .....

M. Rajasekaran VS The Chairman and Others

2002 0 Supreme(Mad) 1183 India - Madras

K.P.SIVASUBRAMANIAM

The court also noted the gravity of the alleged misconduct but ordered the petitioner to be reinstated in service and kept under ... proceedings, the violation of principles of natural justice, the availability of alternative remedies, and the gravity of the alleged misconduct ... curtail misconduct. ... On 5.9.2001 a letter was addressed to the petitioner expressing the intention of the competent authority to hold an enquiry and that Dr.Mariappan was appointed as Enquiry Officer. On 11.9.2000 the petitioner has stated t....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top