ANU MALHOTRA
Arvind Kumar – Appellant
Versus
C. B. I. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anu Malhotra, J. - Both the petitions i.e. CRL.M.C. 3927/2017 and CRL.M.C. 4556/2018 are taken up together for consideration in view of the factum that they arise out of the proceedings in relation to RC No. 4(A)/08/ACU IX/CBI/ND dated 18.12.2008, whereby, the charge sheet was submitted under Sections 13 (2) r/w 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 109 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860.
Crl. M.C. 3927/2017
2. Vide CRL.M.C. 3927/2017, the petitioner thereof Arvind Kumar arrayed as accused no.1 in the said charge sheet has sought the setting aside of the impugned order dated 07.10.2016 of the Court of the learned Special Judge-03, (P.C. Act) (CBI), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi and has also sought directions to defreeze the bank accounts held by him and has also sought the release of the property documents pertaining to Plot No.55, Sector-43, HUDA, Gurgaon without any stipulation with it having also been prayed by the said petitioner that the respondent/ CBI be directed to pay the enhanced price, interest and other charges to HUDA payable pending adjudication of the matter apart from costs of the petition.
3. Vide the impugned order dated 07.10.2016, t
Askari Begum vs. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1983 SC 60
Binod Kumar vs. State of Bihar Binod Kumar vs. State of Bihar
Krishnanand Agnihotri vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (1977) 1 SCC 816
Mirza Iqbal Hussain through Askari Begum vs. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1983 SC 60
Narsingha Rou vs. Sricharan Panda & Ors. AIR 1967 Ori 182
Nevada Properties Pvt. Ltd. Through its Directors V. State of Maharashtra & Anr.; 2019 (20) SCC 119
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.