SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1225

ANU MALHOTRA
Arvind Kumar – Appellant
Versus
C. B. I. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rajesh Anand, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Mridul Jain, SPP, CBI with Ms. Neha Goel, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J. - Both the petitions i.e. CRL.M.C. 3927/2017 and CRL.M.C. 4556/2018 are taken up together for consideration in view of the factum that they arise out of the proceedings in relation to RC No. 4(A)/08/ACU IX/CBI/ND dated 18.12.2008, whereby, the charge sheet was submitted under Sections 13 (2) r/w 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 109 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860.

Crl. M.C. 3927/2017

2. Vide CRL.M.C. 3927/2017, the petitioner thereof Arvind Kumar arrayed as accused no.1 in the said charge sheet has sought the setting aside of the impugned order dated 07.10.2016 of the Court of the learned Special Judge-03, (P.C. Act) (CBI), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi and has also sought directions to defreeze the bank accounts held by him and has also sought the release of the property documents pertaining to Plot No.55, Sector-43, HUDA, Gurgaon without any stipulation with it having also been prayed by the said petitioner that the respondent/ CBI be directed to pay the enhanced price, interest and other charges to HUDA payable pending adjudication of the matter apart from costs of the petition.

3. Vide the impugned order dated 07.10.2016, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top