AI Overview

AI Overview...

References: - Competition Commission Of India VS Kerala Film Exhibitors Federation - Supreme Court - MOHD. IRFAN VS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI - Delhi - Rusoday Securities Ltd. VS National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. - Supreme Court - Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Ltd. VS Competition Commission of India - Delhi - B. Preethakumari VS Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies (General) - Kerala - Shyam Prakash Meena, S/o. Shri Shiv Lal Meena VS Union Of India, Through Secretary To Government, Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways - Rajasthan - Brahmaputra Television Network, represented by its sole proprietor Ms. Anjana Bora VS Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue - Gauhati

Search Results for "Prescription of Two Civil Monetary Penalties for a Contravention Provisions Actual"

Competition Commission Of India VS Kerala Film Exhibitors Federation

2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1759 India - Supreme Court

MANOJ MISRA, K. V. VISWANATHAN

... ... Issues: Determining the sufficiency of notice provisions regarding penalties and whether the imposed penalties were proportional ... justice, ensuring it aligns with statutory provisions. ... suffices, without a second notice for penalties - An act of imposing penalties must adhere to proportionality as a principle of ... Thereafter, it imposed penalties on Respondent Nos. 1-3 including the monetary penalty. Apart from monetary#HL_....

MOHD.  IRFAN VS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2018 0 Supreme(Del) 1824 India - Delhi

VIPIN SANGHI, I.S.MEHTA

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prescription of the minimum sentence and minimum fine in Section 3 is a conscious ... in continuous unlawful activity as members of an organized crime syndicate or gang driven by their motivation of making illegal monetary ... monetary gains. ... Punishment for contravention in relation to manufactured drugs and preparations. ... He relies on the maxim “generalia specialibus non derogant” and submits that the provisions of IPC cannot be looked at for the purpose....

Rusoday Securities Ltd.  VS National Stock Exchange of India Ltd.

2020 7 Supreme 1 India - Supreme Court

A.M.KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI

could not be treated as modification or abrogation, more so when such provisions further intent of source provisions. ... investors – In any case, no requirement of prior approval is provided for notifying such operational parameters – Power and mode of prescription ... creation of Byelaws, Rules or Regulations etc., scope, extent and operation of such lien would also be governed by same scheme – Actual ... Legal recognition of the role of a trustee and fixing actual obligations to be performed under su....

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Ltd.  VS Competition Commission of India

2019 0 Supreme(Del) 802 India - Delhi

R.K.GAUBA

Competition Act, 2002 - Section 3, 4, 7, 43 - Contravention of provision - Criminal complaints - Contravention ... The Commission is vested with the power to "inquire" into allegations of anti-competitive agreements or acts of commission or omission constituting abuse of dominant position or combinations violative of the prescription of law, by detailed provisions contained in Sections 19 and 20, such power to be ... Inter alia, the civil nature of the punishment was ascertained with r....

B.  Preethakumari VS Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies (General)

2022 0 Supreme(Ker) 678 India - Kerala

ALEXANDER THOMAS, ANU SIVARAMAN, VIJU ABRAHAM

and restore back status of employee, before his termination of service, if it is found that impugned action of dismissal is in contravention ... suspension, enquiry process, imposition of minor/major penalties, etc. ... It is only after compliance with the above said provisions, contained in sub-rule (2A) and sub-rule (2B), that the competent authority can take a decision regarding the issue as to whether or not the penalties mentioned therein could be imposed. ... The impact of these provisions in the ....

Shyam Prakash Meena, S/o.  Shri Shiv Lal Meena VS Union Of India, Through Secretary To Government, Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways

2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 1389 India - Rajasthan

MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, ASHUTOSH KUMAR

The court found that the additional fee was in essence a penalty for non-renewal before expiry, which was not supported by any provision ... to levy a new fine or penalty for any particular kind of contravention or violation of any provisions of the Act of 1988. ... Penalty is broader concept which also is in the nature of punishment and serves as deterrence, it can be monetary and non-monetary. Moreover, fine and penalty are involuntary in nature. ... We have gone through the provisions#HL_EN....

Brahmaputra Television Network, represented by its sole proprietor Ms.  Anjana Bora VS Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue

2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 855 India - Gauhati

MANISH CHOUDHURY

based on statutory provisions, thus aligning with legislative intent. ... - The Adjudicating Authority exercised power under Section 73(2) in making the demand, issuing summed notices, and determining penalties ... actual compliance. ... It was further mentioned that from the data shared by the Central Board of Direct Taxes [CBDT], it was apparent that the noticee-assessee received monetary considerations and made required declarations under various sections of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 relating to provision#HL....

Alka Synthetics Ltd.  VS Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)

1997 0 Supreme(Guj) 104 India - Gujarat

R.BALIA

amount which is held not to be belonging to the claimant and who is claiming refund on the ground that he may be refund it to the actual ... ... The Board had no authority under any provisions of the Act, Rules ... exchange on considerations which have crystalised in an actionable claim - Validity - Board has no authority under any of the provisions ... Apart from aforesaid Chapter VI-A of the Act specifically provides for penalties and adjudication for contraventions of certain provisions#H....

Nisha Priya Bhatia VS Union of India

2020 0 Supreme(SC) 324 India - Supreme Court

A.M.KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI

(g) Research and Analysis Wing (Recruitment, Cadre and Services) Rules, 1975 - Rule 135 - Validity - Mere non-prescription ... - Pension - Pension of an employee retired under Rule 135 - Relevant date - Date of notional superannuation and not the date of actual ... the appellant/petitioner herein shall be computed in accordance with the date of notional superannuation and not from the date of actual ... It has been contended by the appellant before us that Rule 135 is in direct contravention of Article 311 of the Constit....

State of Himachal Pradesh VS Nirmala Devi

2017 3 Supreme 741 India - Supreme Court

A.K.SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN

except that power of Appellate Court to alter sentence awarded by trial court has to be in accordance with law i.e. sentencing provisions ... In the absence of such guidelines in India, the courts go by their own perception about the philosophy behind the prescription of certain specified penal consequences for particular nature of crime. ... At this juncture, I would like to reproduce the provisions under which the respondent has been convicted. ... Mostly, punishment provided for committing offences is either imprisonment or m....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top