AI Overview...
-
Pulukuri Kottayya - Key case in Indian criminal law involving admissibility of statements and evidence collection. The case established that facts discovered, such as the place from which an object is produced and the accused's knowledge of it, are relevant under section 27 of the Evidence Act. It also clarified the admissibility of statements leading to the recovery of evidence, emphasizing the importance of proper procedure and the accused's rights during investigation Chunilal VS Union of India - Himachal Pradesh, DASU RAM VS STATE - Rajasthan, Jaffar Hussain Dastagir VS State Of Maharashtra - Supreme Court.
-
Admissibility of Statements - The case highlighted that certain parts of an accused's statement may be inadmissible if obtained improperly, but other parts related to facts discovered could be relevant. The Privy Council in this case confirmed that the right to copies of statements under Section 161 of the Criminal Procedure Code is valuable and must be upheld to ensure fair trial procedures Noor Khan VS State Of Rajasthan - Supreme Court.
-
Judicial Precedent and Legal Doctrine - The decision in Pulukuri Kottayya has been cited extensively by courts, including the Supreme Court, to support principles regarding the conduct of investigations, the admissibility of evidence, and the importance of safeguarding the rights of the accused. The case's doctrine has been accepted and reaffirmed in subsequent rulings, reinforcing the standards for evidence collection and trial fairness [CHANDRA BHAI
VS STATE - Allahabad](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500032246), Pratap Chandra Mahanta VS State of Orissa (Vigilance) - Orissa, In Re: Gaddam Jayarami Reddi VS State Of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Pulukuri Kottayya is a landmark case that clarified crucial aspects of evidence law in India, particularly concerning the admissibility of statements, the significance of facts discovered during investigation, and the rights of the accused. Its principles continue to influence Indian criminal jurisprudence, emphasizing fair investigation procedures and proper handling of evidence to uphold justice.
Search Results for "Pulukuri Kottayya"
1946 0 Supreme(Mad) 315 • India - Madras
SIR JOHN BEAUMONT, LORD UTHWATT, LORD SIMONDS, LORD WRIGHT
We did all this at the instigation of Pulukuri Kotayya." ... (Signed) ... (") Potla China Matayya ... Kotta Krishnayya ... 12th January, 1945. (Signed) G. Bapaiah, ... Sub-Inspector of Police. ... About 14 days ago, I Kotayya and people of my party lay in wait for Sivayya and others at about sunset time at the corner of Pulipad tank. We, all beat Boddupati Chinna Sivayya and Subbayya to death. The remaining persons, Pullayya, Kotayya and Narayana ran away.
1964 0 Supreme(HP) 1 • India - Himachal Pradesh
OM PARKASH
... It is settled law that "facts discovered", within section 27, Evidence Act, embraces the place from which the object is produced and the knowledge of the accused as to this and that the information relating to this fact is relevant; vide Pulukuri Kottaya v.
1950 0 Supreme(Raj) 134 • India - Rajasthan
SHARMA, RANAWAT
It was also held in the case pulukuri Kottayya v. Emperor, AIR (34) P.
1969 0 Supreme(SC) 355 • India - Supreme Court
G.K.MITTER, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, S.M.SIKRI
We did all this at the instigation of Pulukuri Kotayya." ... The Board held that the whole of the statement except the passage "I hid it (a spear) and my stick in the rick of Venkatanarasu in the village. I will show if you come" was inadmissible. ... The section was considered by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Puluquri Kotayya v. King Emperor, 74 Ind App 65. A question there arose as to what part of a statement of the accused leading to the recovery of a knife in a murder case was admissible in evidence.....
1959 0 Supreme(SC) 12 • India - Supreme Court
K.SUBBA RAO, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, A.K.SARKAR
In Pulukuri Kottayya v.
1963 0 Supreme(SC) 203 • India - Supreme Court
A.K.SARKAR, J.C.SHAH, M.HIDAYATULLAH
... The Court in that case relied upon the observations made by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Pulukuri Kottayya v. ... In dealing with the result of failure to supply copies of statements recorded under S. 161 Code of Criminal Procedure the Judicial Committee observed in Pulukuri Kottayya s case, 74 Ind App 65 ... "The right given to an accused person by this section is a very valuable one and often
2017 0 Supreme(Gau) 1393 • India - Gauhati
HRISHIKESH ROY, HITESH KUMAR SARMA
In the case of Pulukuri Kottayya v.
1988 0 Supreme(All) 655 • India - Allahabad
S.S.AHMED, VIRENDRA KUMAR
Kottayya v. ... State of Uttar Pradesh, Alert. (957 SC 142, the Supreme Court while considering the mistakes or omissions in conduc tion of investigation and the effect of the same on the result of the case, observed : ... The decision of their Lordships of the Judicial Committee reported in Pulukuri
2022 0 Supreme(Ori) 97 • India - Orissa
A.K.MOHAPATRA
In Pulukuri Kottayya v.
1957 0 Supreme(AP) 99 • India - Andhra Pradesh
P.CHANDRA REDDY, SYED QUAMAR HASAN
On the other hand, Chandrasekhara lyer J. , who spoke for himself and Jagamiadha Das, J. , with whom Bose J. , agreed has observed referring to Pulukuri Kottayya v. ... There is no Indication in the report that their Lordships meant to strike a different note from Pulukuri Kotiahs case, AIR 1947 PC 67, the doctrine of which has been accepted by the Supreme Court also. In Purushottam Jethanand v.
Filter by Legal Phrase
