AI Overview...
-
Quest Merchandise - The phrase merchandise in legal context primarily refers to goods or products that are registered under trademarks for commercial use. The trademarks Quest and Brahmos are registered in favor of the respective plaintiffs for all merchandise of specific classifications, and their validity cannot be challenged in infringement proceedings under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. The registration affirms their exclusive rights in relation to the goods they cover. Brahmos Aerospace VS Fiit Jee Limited - Delhi, BRAHMOS AEROSPACE PVT. LTD. VS FIIT JEE LIMITED - Delhi
-
Trademark Registration and Infringement - Trademark registration grants exclusive rights to use the mark in relation to specific merchandise, protecting against infringement, passing off, and unfair competition. Disputes under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act involve allegations of unauthorized use or threats of legal action based on these registered marks. Brahmos Aerospace VS Fiit Jee Limited - Delhi, BRAHMOS AEROSPACE PVT. LTD. VS FIIT JEE LIMITED - Delhi, Caesar Park Hotels and Resorts Inc VS Westinn Hospitality Services Limited - Madras
-
Legal Profession and Advocacy - Advocates are bound by the fundamental principle that their role is to legitimately present their client's case without engaging in a blind pursuit of relief, emphasizing the dignity of the legal institution. The phrase law is no trade, briefs no merchandise underscores that legal practice is rooted in service and justice, not commercial trade. This ethical stance guides advocates to uphold integrity over mercenary motives. R. Muthukrishnan VS Registrar General of the High Court of Judicature at Madras - Supreme Court, IN RE : MOHIT CHAUDHARY, ADVOCATE VS . - Supreme Court, In Re: Prashant Bhushan VS . - Supreme Court, P. Kalpana VS State of Telangana - Andhra Pradesh, P. Kalpana VS State of Telangana - Andhra Pradesh, N. Eswaranathan VS State Represented By The Deputy Superintendent Of Police - Supreme Court
-
Analysis and Conclusion - The legal discussion distinguishes between the commercial use of trademarks, which is protected under specific statutes, and the ethical responsibilities of advocates, which emphasize integrity and service over mercenary pursuits. The registration of trademarks like Quest and Brahmos secures exclusive rights for merchandise, while advocates are reminded to uphold the dignity of the profession by avoiding a mercenary approach to legal practice. Overall, the sources highlight the importance of respecting trademark law and maintaining ethical standards in legal advocacy.
Search Results for "Quest Merchandise"
2019 0 Supreme(SC) 345 • India - Supreme Court
ARUN MISHRA, VINEET SARAN
The fundamentals of the profession thus require an advocate not to be immersed in a blind quest of relief for his client. The dignity of the institution cannot be violated in this quest as “law is no trade, briefs no merchandise” as per Krishna Iyer, J in Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M.V. ... An Advocate shall not to be immersed in a blind quest of relief for his client. “Law is not trade, briefs no merchandise”. His duty is to legitimately present his side of the case to assist in the administration o....
2018 1 Supreme 158 • India - Supreme Court
JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
of the court have their primary duty towards the Court and then responsibility towards their clients – Law is no trade, brief no merchandise ... The fundamentals of the profession thus require an advocate not to be immersed in a blind quest of relief for his client. The dignity of the institution cannot be violated in this quest as “law is no trade, briefs no merchandise” as per Krishna Iyer, J in Bar Council of Maharashtra vs.
2020 0 Supreme(SC) 515 • India - Supreme Court
ARUN MISHRA, B.R.GAVAI, KRISHNA MURARI
The fundamentals of the profession thus require an advocate not to be immersed in a blind quest of relief for his client. The dignity of the institution cannot be violated in this quest as “law is no trade, briefs no merchandise” as per Krishna Iyer, J. in Bar Council of Maharashtra vs. M.V. ... An advocate shall not to be immersed in a blind quest of relief for his client. “Law is not trade, briefs no merchandise.” His duty is to legitimately present his side of the case to assist in the administration....
2016 0 Supreme(AP) 733 • India - Andhra Pradesh
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
The fundamentals of the profession thus require an advocate not to be immersed in a blind quest of relief for his client. The dignity of the institution cannot be violated in this quest as "law is no trade, briefs no merchandise (vide Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M.V.
2018 0 Supreme(AP) 550 • India - Andhra Pradesh
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
The fundamentals of the profession thus require an advocate not to be immersed in a blind quest of relief for his client. The dignity of the institution cannot be violated in this quest as "law is no trade, briefs no merchandise (vide Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M.V.
2025 0 Supreme(SC) 654 • India - Supreme Court
BELA M. TRIVEDI, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
The dignity of the institution cannot be violated in this quest as “law is no trade, briefs no merchandise.” 2. ... (2017) 16 SCC 78, this Court has observed that the fundamentals of the profession require an Advocate not to be immersed in a blind quest of relief for his client.
2014 0 Supreme(Del) 371 • India - Delhi
MANMOHAN SINGH
well-known trademark based on the following factors: * The mark is registered in favor of the plaintiff in relation to all the merchandise ... Quest, New Delhi. ... Its validity cannot be challenged in the infringement proceedings under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. (See Corn Products Refining Co. vs. Shangrila Food Products Ltd. AIR 1960 SC 142, Amritdhara Pharmacy vs. ... Admittedly, the trademark BRAHMOS is registered in favour of the plaintiff in relation to all the merchandise goods of classification i....
2014 0 Supreme(Del) 3363 • India - Delhi
MANMOHAN SINGH
- The mark is registered in favour of the plaintiff in relation to all the merchandise goods of classification including the ... Quest (defendants) for infringement of trademark, passing off, unfair competition, rendition of accounts, damages, etc. ... Its validity cannot be challenged in the infringement proceedings under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. (See Corn Products Refining Co. Vs. Shangrila Food Products Ltd. AIR 1960 SC 142, Amritdhara Pharmacy Vs. ... Admittedly, the trademark BRAHMOS is registered in favour of the p....
2002 0 Supreme(Del) 1785 • India - Delhi
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
In Stroud s Judicial Dictionary (Fifth Edition) the term commercial is defined as "traffic, trade or merchandise in buying and selling of goods. " In the said dictionary the phrase domestic purpose is stated to mean use for personal residential purposes. ... This has also to be appreciated in the context that in the absence of the transit accommodation, the employees would be staying on payment of charges in quest house or hotels. ... It is the user of the premises by the owner (not necessarily absolute owner) which is relevant for determination of the....
1998 0 Supreme(Mad) 822 • India - Madras
M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958-Section 120-Dispute regarding use4 of trade name and logo-Appellants using admittedly using ... No. 5 of 1996 against the plaintiff for permanent injunction against the groundless threat of legal proceeding within the meaning of Section 120 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. ... No. 5 of 1996 against the plaintiff under Section 120 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 alleging groundless threat and sought injunction. Only thereafter, the plaintiff CPHR filed the present suit in C.S.....
Filter by Legal Phrase
