AI Overview...
-
Rabiya Bi Kassim M. Case - The Karnataka High Court, in the case of Rabiya Bi Kassim M. vs. The Country Wide Consumer Financial Service Ltd. (ILR 2004 KAR 2215), held that once a matter has been heard and is posted for judgment, the court's sole responsibility is to pronounce the judgment. No further proceedings are required at that stage Uttaradimath VS Raghavendraswamy Math - Karnataka, Priyanka Nityanand Myana VS Rahul Baburao More - Bombay, SRI UTTARADIMTH, BANGALORE VS RAGHAVENDRASWAMY MATH, MANTRALAYA, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - Karnataka, Abdul Shukoor S/o Gulam Rasool VS Samad Pasha S/o Late Gulam Dastagir - Karnataka, Leeladevi VS Narayan - Current Civil Cases.
-
Judicial Principles - The decision references the principle established in Mohindra Kumar v. Union of India (AIR 1964 SC 993), emphasizing the importance of proper judicial procedure and the finality of judgments once the case is ready for pronouncement RABIYA BI KASSIM M. VS COUNTRY-WIDE CONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVICE LIMITED, BANGALORE - Karnataka, S. V. Revanaradhya VS Jagadish Mallikarjunaiah Chakrabhavi - Karnataka.
-
Court's Procedure - The case underscores that after hearing arguments and setting a matter for judgment, the court need only pronounce its decision, indicating efficiency and finality in judicial proceedings Uttaradimath VS Raghavendraswamy Math - Karnataka, Priyanka Nityanand Myana VS Rahul Baburao More - Bombay, SRI UTTARADIMTH, BANGALORE VS RAGHAVENDRASWAMY MATH, MANTRALAYA, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - Karnataka.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The case of Rabiya Bi Kassim M. exemplifies the judicial principle that, after hearing and final argument, the court's role is limited to pronouncing judgment, reinforcing procedural efficiency and finality in legal proceedings. This principle is supported by relevant judgments from the Karnataka High Court and the Supreme Court of India.
Search Results for "Rabiya Bi Kassim m"
2010 0 Supreme(Kar) 1166 • India - Karnataka
S.ABDUL NAZEER
In this connection, he has relied on a decision of this Court in Rabiya Bi Kassim M. Vs. The Country Wide Consumer Financial Service Ltd., ILR (2004) KAR 2215 ... 4. On the other hand, Sri K. ... In Rabia Bi Kassim's case, a Division Bench of this Court has held that once the matter has been heard and posted for judgment, nothing is required to be done by the Court except to pronounce the judgment.
2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2085 • India - Bombay
RAVINDRA V.GHUGE
Reliance is also placed upon the Divisions Bench judgment of the Karnataka High Court in the matter of Rabiya Bi Kassim M. vs. The Country Wide Consumer [ILR 2004 KAR 2215 = 2004 (4) Kar.L.J.189]. 8.
2004 0 Supreme(Kar) 261 • India - Karnataka
N.K.JAIN, V.G.SABHAHIT
2022 0 Supreme(HP) 434 • India - Himachal Pradesh
SANDEEP SHARMA
Mohindra Kumar and Ors, AIR 1964 SC 993, the Karnataka High Court in Rabiya Bi Kassim v.
2010 0 Supreme(Kar) 512 • India - Karnataka
S.ABDUL NAZEER
In this connection, he has relied on a decision of this Court in Rabiya Bi Kassim M. u The Country-Wide Consumer Financial Service Limited, Bangalore. ... 4. ... In Rabia Bi Kassim's case, a Division Bench of this Court has held that once the matter has been heard and posted for judgment, nothing is required to be done by the Court except to pronounce the judgment.
2019 0 Supreme(Kar) 1824 • India - Karnataka
JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA
Food Products, (2012) 2 SCC 196 and the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Rabiya Bi Kassim M. vs. The Country Wide Consumer Financial Service Limited, 2004 (4) Kar.
2017 0 Supreme(Kar) 453 • India - Karnataka
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
A Division Bench of this Court in the case of RABIYA BI KASSIM M. vs THE COUNTRY WIDE CONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVICE LIMITED [ILR 2004 KAR 2215] has held as below :- ... “9.
• India - Current Civil Cases
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
A Division Bench of this Court in the case of Rabiya bi Kassim v. The Country Wide Consumer Financial Services Ltd., [ILR 2004 KAR 2215] has held as below :- ... “9.
2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 8701 • India - High Court of Telangana
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J
[AIR 1964 SC 993] , and the judgment of Karnataka High Court in Rabiya Bi Kassim v.
2010 0 Supreme(Kar) 244 • India - Karnataka
S.ABDUL NAZEER
MOHINDRA KUMAR – AIR 1964 SC 993 AND ILR 2004 KAR 2215 between RABIYA BI KASSIM M vs. THE COUNTRY WIDE CONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVIES LTD.). ... The defendant has not availed the ample opportunities granted by the trial court to lead his evidence.
Filter by Legal Phrase
